economy fed fomc Markets stocks

Nomura’s Charlie McElligott Brings Some ‘Real Heat’, Talks Fed’s ‘New Playbook’, Another ‘Reflation Run’

"But for the real 'HEAT' of today’s note"...

Nomura’s Charlie McElligott really has a knack for engaging market commentary – perhaps you noticed.

On Thursday, he’s got some fire for you – in hip hop parlance, Charlie is comin’ with that heat. And we mean that literally. He actually says that:

But for the real “HEAT” of today’s note, see see my “CLARIDA’S COMMENTARY ON TUESDAY WAS A MAJOR ‘TELL’ ON A NEW FED PLAYBOOK…

Before we get to Charlie’s hottest “bars“, though, it’s worth noting right off the bat that equities are still benefitting/vol. is still being suppressed by “very significant long gamma”, where “very significant” means “84th %ile $Gamma between SPX and SPY consolidated options, while too we see ‘extreme’ $Delta at 95th %Ile”, according to McElligott.

(Nomura)

If you’re looking to explain why SPX remains “pinned” ahead of expiry and, relatedly, why Wednesday’s range was the second smallest of 2019, that’s one answer. “Six of April’s nine trading days thus far [are] within the top 20 smallest intraday range list YTD”, Charlie goes on to write.

He also notes that “VVIX is starting to ‘get legs’ a touch here”. For Charlie, that’s down to “the PUT WING (think ‘old regime’ VIX at 8-9-10 again) re-entering the imagination and ‘worth something’ again, as CB’s mutilate vols and the entire world pivots back into ‘roll-down’/’carry’ mode.” He goes on to marvel that “as it pertains to VIX options, the 1m PUT Skew is  90th %ile vs 1m Call Skew only 46th %ile!”

(Nomura)

As far as the overarching macro narrative, McElligott says things may be setting up “for another ‘cyclical reflation’ run” and as was the case earlier this year, that’s pretty interesting when juxtaposed with “enormous ‘length’ in DM Bonds / Rates.”

“‘Long TIPS’ and ‘VIX roll-down’ feel like the place to be”, Charlie says.

Earlier this week, you’ll recall that McElligott talked at length about the extent to which the repricing higher of growth expectations off the late-March scare (which was exacerbated by a positioning squeeze that caused manic rates moves following the March FOMC, magnifying the DM bond rally and thereby contributing to something of a “false optic” re: how “bad” things were from a growth perspective) is rippling across equities.

Read more

‘April Is Booming’ And Nomura’s Charlie McElligott Is ‘Excited’

He revisits that on Thursday and in part attributes it to comments from Clarida. Here’s Charlie:

Within US Equities, the significant April MTD “+ Value, (-) Momentum” dynamic continued again y’day—which I believe is tied-into not just the ongoing trend of “re-pricing of Growth HIGHER” following the late-March overshoot in Rates, but also the VERY notable comments from Clarida Tuesday night which speak to the possibility of running an asymmetric policy on inflation potentially via the Labor market.

After recounting the ongoing outperformance of various value factors, McElligott again employs a bit of amusing pop culture parlance, noting that in conjunction with the Value factor run-up, Momentum continues to “get served” – God bless him. To wit:

Conversely ‘Momentum” continues to get served—Vol Adjusted Momentum is now -2.3% MTD and -5.0% YTD; Sector-Neutral (“quant”) 1Y Momentum is now -2.4% MTD and -6.7% YTD; and “pure” 1Y Price Momentum is now -3.5% MTD and -8.4% YTD as “Growth”- factor chops and Defensives / Low Vol / Bond Proxies struggle (against the aforementioned “Cyclical Beta” rally)—reversing much of the 2018 dynamic inherent in 1Y Momentum.

So, what about Clarida has Charlie all fired up? Well, the NAIRU comments. Specifically, these (from the text of a speech at the Minneapolis Fed):

[The U.S. jobless rate, currently 3.8%] has been interpreted by many observers as suggesting that the labor market is currently operating beyond full employment. However, the level of the unemployment rate that is consistent with full employment is not directly observable and thus must be estimated. The range of plausible estimates likely extends at least as low as the current level of the unemployment rate.

For McElligott, this is a big deal. “[This] does not just simply speak to the ‘pivoted’ Fed outlook where rates at the very least may need to stay at the effective lower bound for even longer”, he writes on Thursday. For Charlie, it goes beyond that, because in his eyes, Clarida’s remarks “iterated a shift towards ASYMMETRIC POLICY where the Fed is acknowledging they may need to be cut lower from here if they continue to be unsuccessful in getting Core PCE to run sustainably at their 2% objective.”

He goes on to say that Clarida’s comments are consistent with a paper you can read here called “Asymmetric monetary policy and the effective lower bound”. I’m guessing nobody is going to read that paper and Charlie appears to think the same, so in order to help folks along, he highlights the “punchline(s)” which are as follows:

This result suggests that the ELB (“effective lower bound”) is a particularly pernicious constraint on policymakers who are unable or unwilling to influence private sector expectations through credible commitments.

As an alternative, we consider policymakers with an asymmetric loss function that places weight on deviations of output below potential but no weight on deviations above potential…we show that policymakers who minimize such an asymmetric loss function are able to achieve better inflation outcomes than policymakers with a symmetric loss function.

This result suggests that policies that systematically ease more in circumstances when inflation is low than they tighten when inflation is high can be an effective way of mitigating the undershooting of inflation caused by the ELB.

What does all of that mean? Well, the short version appears to be that this is yet another nod to the idea that we’re going to see a reflationary shift in the policy framework going forward.

“With this fresh set of ‘tells’ on the Fed mindset… my view here is the Fed is looking to run the jobs market SUPER hot going forward through said ‘policy asymmetry’ in order to reset inflation expectations”, Charlie muses.

Were Donald Trump capable of understanding all of that, it would probably please the president, who would just love to see (and then brag about) a 2-handle on the unemployment rate.


 

5 comments on “Nomura’s Charlie McElligott Brings Some ‘Real Heat’, Talks Fed’s ‘New Playbook’, Another ‘Reflation Run’

  1. Haha, I can picture Trump “2-handle unemployment, they are the best 2 handles ever made, America needs more handle technology!”, before an ‘advisor’ tells him what a 2-handle actually means.

    • “Handles = jobs jobs jobs!”

    • President Obama did the herculean work of restoring the unemployment rate to a consistently reliable declension but all we ever heard from the consummately Orwellian GOPer propaganda was “no labor participation! manipulated statistics!”

      The perfidious grifter Orangehole comes along and squats his racketeering cesspool in our WH, continues to reap the automatic benefits of President Obama’s progress, and his paltry few percentage points are now the pillars of Scummo’s hagiographic knee-padding by the nee Republican cultists.

      Does anybody know exactly where or how I go about investigating/parsing the statistics of “labor participation” vis-a-vis unemployment numbers? My suspicion is that the rates are, at best, equal for both President Obama and Orangehole; and actually, I think there are a lot more older people working two jobs to make ends meet in this current incarnation of GOPer tax scam/Treasury rape environment.

      Any suggestions/statistics would be greatly and earnestly appreciated.

  2. “..“false optic” re: how “bad” things were from a growth perspective…”

    I get the context and understand the professional implications/exegesis of analysts – and why this is absolutely a relevant phrase. However, I believe given that this rumor rally/death throe is an incestuous low-vol barrel-of-fish banksters playing asset Ponzi, and using their massive insider resources/technology to game the free money musical chairs, I do quibble with the “false optic” appellation.

    Things are that bad and besides those walking around on circus-calibre leveraged stilts, those not besotted by hopium “bull” narratives in the macro Rorschach see a much more existential, plebian view of things: it sure feels ominous on the existential stretches of Main Street. In fact, it sure seems a lot more like the a cheval ambivalence of 2000-2001 recession beginning than it does some winsome 2009 juggernaut.

    I’m a bug sitting in cash and a ton of inverse assets, waiting; I get that. But I’m not going to be the bug closest to the 1929 ilk trumpCrash zapper when – by the end of the summer at most – another iteration of a Great Bush Recession “surprises” everybody.

    • Anonymous

      Good luck on not being able to see through the fog , the 4th qtr panic, the govt shutdown, brexit and trade fears are trying to scare companies (and individuals) from making capital commitments. Of course it is likely that magic IQ man will create some other problem that makes things worse, perhaps we will pick a fight with Liechtenstein. There is pent up investment potential waiting for the all clear.

Speak On It

Skip to toolbar