A Dumb As Shit, Hopelessly Idiotic, Crazy Moron: What Michael Wolff Says Trump’s Associates Think Of Him

It’s probably safe to say that whatever was left of Donald Trump’s sanity has flown the coop over the past 24 hours.

Excerpts from Michael Wolff’s new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House” rocked 1600 Penn. on Wednesday, kicking off what promises to be a protracted and brutal war of words between the President and former strategist Steve Bannon who, according to Wolff, suggested that Don Jr.’s Trump Tower meeting was tantamount to treason.

The book will be published on January 9, but thanks to a steady stream of leaks and articles by Wolff himself, everyone already knows what it’s going to reveal: namely that this administration is just as batshit crazy as feared – and then some.

On Thursday, The Hollywood Reporter has published what they’re calling “an extracted column” by Wolff that documents “his time in the White House based on the reporting included in Fire and Fury.”

Meanwhile, NY Magazine had a similar piece out on Wednesday – also by Wolff – that suggests Trump did not want to be President in the first place.

This is all so crazy that it’s difficult to know exactly where to start, but we’re just going to include some excerpts from the pieces mentioned above for you to peruse and the links to the full pieces in case you’re inclined to spend Thursday becoming even more disillusioned with this President than you already were.

Via The Hollywood Reporter

interviewed Donald Trump for The Hollywood Reporter in June 2016, and he seemed to have liked – or not disliked – the piece I wrote. “Great cover!” his press assistant, Hope Hicks, emailed me after it came out (it was a picture of a belligerent Trump in mirrored sunglasses). After the election, I proposed to him that I come to the White House and report an inside story for later publication – journalistically, as a fly on the wall – which he seemed to misconstrue as a request for a job. No, I said. I’d like to just watch and write a book. “A book?” he responded, losing interest. “I hear a lot of people want to write books,” he added, clearly not understanding why anybody would. “Do you know Ed Klein?”– author of several virulently anti-Hillary books. “Great guy. I think he should write a book about me.” But sure, Trump seemed to say, knock yourself out.

Since the new White House was often uncertain about what the president meant or did not mean in any given utterance, his non-disapproval became a kind of passport for me to hang around – checking in each week at the Hay-Adams hotel, making appointments with various senior staffers who put my name in the “system,” and then wandering across the street to the White House and plunking myself down, day after day, on a West Wing couch.

The West Wing is configured in such a way that the anteroom is quite a thoroughfare – everybody passes by. Assistants – young women in the Trump uniform of short skirts, high boots, long and loose hair – as well as, in situation-comedy proximity, all the new stars of the show: Steve Bannon, Kellyanne Conway, Reince Priebus, Sean Spicer, Jared Kushner, Mike Pence, Gary Cohn, Michael Flynn (and after Flynn’s abrupt departure less than a month into the job for his involvement in the Russia affair, his replacement, H.R. McMaster), all neatly accessible.

The nature of the comedy, it was soon clear, was that here was a group of ambitious men and women who had reached the pinnacle of power, a high-ranking White House appointment – with the punchline that Donald Trump was president. Their estimable accomplishment of getting to the West Wing risked at any moment becoming farce.

[…]

“You can’t make this shit up,” Sean Spicer, soon to be portrayed as the most hapless man in America, muttered to himself after his tortured press briefing on the first day of the new administration, when he was called to justify the president’s inaugural crowd numbers – and soon enough, he adopted this as a personal mantra. Reince Priebus, the new chief of staff, had, shortly after the announcement of his appointment in November, started to think he would not last until the inauguration. Then, making it to the White House, he hoped he could last a respectable year, but he quickly scaled back his goal to six months. Kellyanne Conway, who would put a finger-gun to her head in private about Trump’s public comments, continued to mount an implacable defense on cable television, until she was pulled off the air by others in the White House who, however much the president enjoyed her, found her militancy idiotic. (Even Ivanka and Jared regarded Conway’s fulsome defenses as cringeworthy.)

Steve Bannon tried to gamely suggest that Trump was mere front man and that he, with plan and purpose and intellect, was, more reasonably, running the show – commanding a whiteboard of policies and initiatives that he claimed to have assembled from Trump’s off-the-cuff ramblings and utterances. His adoption of the Saturday Night Live sobriquet “President Bannon” was less than entirely humorous. Within the first few weeks, even rote conversations with senior staff trying to explain the new White House’s policies and positions would turn into a body-language ballet of eye-rolling and shrugs and pantomime of jaws dropping. Leaking became the political manifestation of the don’t-blame-me eye roll.

The surreal sense of the Trump presidency was being lived as intensely inside the White House as out. Trump was, for the people closest to him, the ultimate enigma. He had been elected president, that through-the-eye-of-the-needle feat, but obviously, he was yet … Trump. Indeed, he seemed as confused as anyone to find himself in the White House, even attempting to barricade himself into his bedroom with his own lock over the protests of the Secret Service.

[…]

While there might be a scary national movement of Trumpers, the reality in the White House was stranger still: There was Jared and Ivanka, Democrats; there was Priebus, a mainstream Republican; and there was Bannon, whose reasonable claim to be the one person actually representing Trumpism so infuriated Trump that Bannon was hopelessly sidelined by April. “How much influence do you think Steve Bannon has over me? Zero! Zero!” Trump muttered and stormed. To say that no one was in charge, that there were no guiding principles, not even a working org chart, would again be an understatement. “What do these people do?” asked everyone pretty much of everyone else.

[…]

Reigning over all of this was Trump, enigma, cipher and disruptor. How to get along with Trump – who veered between a kind of blissed-out pleasure of being in the Oval Office and a deep, childish frustration that he couldn’t have what he wanted? Here was a man singularly focused on his own needs for instant gratification, be that a hamburger, a segment on Fox & Friends or an Oval Office photo opp. “I want a win. I want a win. Where’s my win?” he would regularly declaim. He was, in words used by almost every member of the senior staff on repeated occasions, “like a child.” A chronic naysayer, Trump himself stoked constant discord with his daily after-dinner phone calls to his billionaire friends about the disloyalty and incompetence around him. His billionaire friends then shared this with their billionaire friends, creating the endless leaks which the president so furiously railed against.

[…]

There was, after the abrupt Scaramucci meltdown, hardly any effort inside the West Wing to disguise the sense of ludicrousness and anger felt by every member of the senior staff toward Trump’s family and Trump himself. It became almost a kind of competition to demystify Trump. For Rex Tillerson, he was a moron. For Gary Cohn, he was dumb as shit. For H.R. McMaster, he was a hopeless idiot. For Steve Bannon, he had lost his mind.

Most succinctly, no one expected him to survive Mueller. Whatever the substance of the Russia “collusion,” Trump, in the estimation of his senior staff, did not have the discipline to navigate a tough investigation, nor the credibility to attract the caliber of lawyers he would need to help him. (At least nine major law firms had turned down an invitation to represent the president.)

 

Via NY Magazine

On the afternoon of November 8, 2016, Kellyanne Conway settled into her glass office at Trump Tower. Right up until the last weeks of the race, the campaign headquarters had remained a listless place. All that seemed to distinguish it from a corporate back office were a few posters with right-wing slogans.

Conway, the campaign’s manager, was in a remarkably buoyant mood, considering she was about to experience a resounding, if not cataclysmic, defeat. Donald Trump would lose the election – of this she was sure – but he would quite possibly hold the defeat to under six points. That was a substantial victory. As for the looming defeat itself, she shrugged it off: It was Reince Priebus’s fault, not hers.

She had spent a good part of the day calling friends and allies in the political world and blaming Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee. Now she briefed some of the television producers and anchors whom she had been carefully courting since joining the Trump campaign – and with whom she had been actively interviewing in the last few weeks, hoping to land a permanent on-air job after the election.

Even though the numbers in a few key states had appeared to be changing to Trump’s advantage, neither Conway nor Trump himself nor his son-in-law, Jared Kushner – the effective head of the campaign – ­wavered in their certainty: Their unexpected adventure would soon be over. Not only would Trump not be president, almost everyone in the campaign agreed, he should probably not be. Conveniently, the former conviction meant nobody had to deal with the latter issue.

As the campaign came to an end, Trump himself was sanguine. His ultimate goal, after all, had never been to win. “I can be the most famous man in the world,” he had told his aide Sam Nunberg at the outset of the race. His longtime friend Roger Ailes, the former head of Fox News, liked to say that if you want a career in television, first run for president. Now Trump, encouraged by Ailes, was floating rumors about a Trump network. It was a great future. He would come out of this campaign, Trump assured Ailes, with a far more powerful brand and untold opportunities.

“This is bigger than I ever dreamed of,” he told Ailes a week before the election. “I don’t think about losing, because it isn’t losing. We’ve totally won.”

From the start, the leitmotif for Trump about his own campaign was how crappy it was, and how everybody involved in it was a loser. In August, when he was trailing Hillary Clinton by more than 12 points, he couldn’t conjure even a far-fetched scenario for achieving an electoral victory. He was baffled when the right-wing billionaire Robert Mercer, a Ted Cruz backer whom Trump barely knew, offered him an infusion of $5 million. When Mercer and his daughter Rebekah presented their plan to take over the campaign and install their lieutenants, Steve Bannon and Conway, Trump didn’t resist. He only expressed vast incomprehension about why anyone would want to do that. “This thing,” he told the Mercers, “is so fucked up.”

Bannon, who became chief executive of Trump’s team in mid-August, called it “the broke-dick campaign.” Almost immediately, he saw that it was hampered by an even deeper structural flaw: The candidate who billed himself as a billionaire – ten times over – refused to invest his own money in it. Bannon told Kushner that, after the first debate in September, they would need another $50 million to cover them until Election Day.

Leave a Reply to edCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 thoughts on “A Dumb As Shit, Hopelessly Idiotic, Crazy Moron: What Michael Wolff Says Trump’s Associates Think Of Him

  1. June 1, 2016 – Michael Wolff’s interview with trump – at the very beginning – before all the shit hit the fan.
    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/donald-trump-conversation-politics-dark-898465

    I certainly did not read this at that time. I have now read this column from Heisenberg which relates a whole bunch of Wolff’s book, Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, and have seen wide media coverage and discussions and tremendous exposure. I hope it pins more guilty as charged on trump!

    Heisenberg gave us this June 2016 article to read which I did not read yesterday. Catching up on links today and read this one, provided in the very first sentence that Heisenberg quoted (above): “I interviewed Donald Trump for The Hollywood Reporter in June 2016, and he seemed to have liked – or not disliked – the piece I wrote. “Great cover!” his press assistant, Hope Hicks, emailed me after it came out (it was a picture of a belligerent Trump in mirrored sunglasses).”

    If you too skipped that link on the word *interviewed*, you absolutely MUST take the time to read it right now. I also provided that link at the beginning of my comment here, at the top.

    I feel sure you will see the trump we now have did exist then. He is worse now. It is clear in the interview that trump is only in it for trump and has little to no regard for what is now known as “his base”. I appreciate that Heis has provided us the information via this column and I only wish that all of America had read and paid more attention to the phony disgrace of a man who ultimately became president. He clearly was not interested in serving as president. He only wanted to win and achieve the recognition and see more machine guns surrounding his home.

    This June 2016 interview and resulting article by Michael Wolff proves that his 2018 book is the truth.

    1. Murphy,
      I may be an “idiot” as you have said but you really can’t accept this guy Wolff as anything but a tab writer hoping for his 15 minutes of fame – and he got it! Wolff would sell his Mother on the street if it got him a glimmer of recognition (maybe he has?) I think even the Heis has disdain for this guy.
      Keep on keeping on.
      Ed

      1. Ed, your comment is more proof you are an idiot. Just because he writes the truth about your boyfriend that literally hundreds of people think is just plain ignorant does not make him shady. Heis is entitled to think any thing he wants to, just like me and just like you.

        By the way, I am curious — how many id’s do you use on this blog? Anonymous and Ed and bobrady or something like that?

        1. I mean, he taped the conversations. And if Trump sues, those tapes will be played in discovery. So you know, this is just another one of those times where people are in denial and nothing is going to stop them from persisting in a fantasy world. It’s just like how Trump and Fox and the right-wing blogosphere said Mueller probe was nothing. And then Manafort was indicted. And then Flynn pleaded guilty. Nothing matters in these people’s minds. They can’t admit to themselves that were duped this badly. But when it comes to Wolff, there’s this: https://www.axios.com/how-michael-wolff-did-it-2522360813.html

          and again, those tapes would be played if Trump sues.

        2. Murphy. new to this computer stuff. signed on as Ed last month but couple days ago the Heis said had to sign up for something else to continue getting his stuff. Bobrady has been my signal for awhile. Don’t know about the 3rd Id you say I have. If it was intelligent, I claim it!
          ed

          1. adding liar to your composite now. Originally you signed on as Anonymous, then added the Ed and now this new bobrady. The only thing I know about Heis saying a couple days ago was to introduce his Forum link. You are not new to computer stuff – you just think you are funny. ha.

  2. Hello readers….I would really like to read something new….how about some creative and independent thoughts on an alternative present and future. What if this country were run by: (pick your poison)…Romney, Hillary, Bernie, Warren, Paul Ryan, Mao, Xi, Stalin, Putin, the Pope, Attila the Hun, Jamie the Dimon, or Mario Gabelli? What if there were no Constitution, or if we just ignored it like we are presently doing?.. Would you like to have the rules of a civilized society?…What is civilized anyway?..Why can’t we be happy?…Maybe we should look for guidance from the primitive peoples….Or maybe our personal God… expressed as our higher self… could inspire us to be a better people, in a contagious sort of way. Our individualism…. and our exceptional potential, as derived from the power of positive thinking, will ultimately carry us to the future of our choosing.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints