Albert Edwards Doubts Bond Selloff Has Legs. And That’s Good For The FAAMG Bubble

Albert Edwards Doubts Bond Selloff Has Legs. And That’s Good For The FAAMG Bubble

“The US equity market rally over the last few years, concentrated almost exclusively on FAAMG stocks, is hugely dependent on the goodwill of the bond market”, SocGen’s Albert Edwards writes, in his latest note, out Thursday.

That echoes a warning delivered in these hallowed (or is “hollow” better?) pages on any number of occasions over the past two years, including on Wednesday afternoon.

The inexorable rally in mega-cap tech is tethered to the duration infatuation in rates. Regular readers have heard this more times than they probably care to recount. As bonds rallied and the curve flattened into a “slow-flation” macro environment, secular growth names outperformed. Eventually, that outperformance took on a life of its own and became self-fulfilling in what Howard Marks famously described as a “perpetual motion machine” dynamic. The figure (below) helps illustrate the point.

The worry is that after years (upon years) of this, the broader market simply isn’t prepared for a pro-cyclical rotation — that even if the macro regime shifts due to massive global stimulus and a faster-than-expected recovery as vaccines and therapeutics become widely available, Value, small-caps, and the like simply aren’t capable of shouldering the burden.

That’s what makes the one-two punch of rising long-end yields and regulatory scrutiny around America’s tech giants potentially perilous.

This discussion took on an extra sense of urgency this week when 30-year yields in the US pushed back through their 200-day moving average for the first time in 2020 while lawmakers debated the details of a proposal to rein in, and perhaps even break up, tech behemoths.

Of course, as Edwards writes Thursday, this discussion is premature, to put it nicely.

After all, inflation is nowhere near target stateside and across the pond, Europe is chancing a deflationary spiral. “The recent eurozone inflation data convinces me more than ever that I should remain a zealot among bond bulls for a while yet”, Edwards says, noting that eurozone disinflation was a foregone conclusion.

“If you can only eke out a cyclical peak of 1% at the end of the economic cycle, what do you expect when recession comes knocking?”, Albert wonders. This, apparently:

As you might imagine, Edwards isn’t convinced that the US is out of the deflationary woods by any stretch — the Fed’s shift to average inflation targeting and fiscal-monetary “partnerships” notwithstanding.

After all, you have to demonstrate the capacity to create above-target inflation if you intend to let it run “hot” to make up for previous shortfalls. The Fed has not demonstrated that capacity.

Although the latest inflation data out of the US has generally surprised to the upside, Edwards is hardly alone in suggesting that the deflationary impact of the pandemic, combined with well-known structural factors, may continue to push the rest of the developed world in the direction of “Japanification”.

“My view is we are due another stunning decline in US core inflation (like we have just seen in the eurozone) and nominal 30y yields will be driven yet lower as inflation expectations catch up on the downside”, he said Thursday.

Some readers will be pleased to know that Albert does include a bit of his trademark balderdash, accusing central banks of drinking their own Kool-Aid, perhaps because doing so is good way to endear yourself to colleagues and prove your commitment to the profession. He cites the following excerpt from a new NBER Working Paper called “Fifty Shades of QE: Conflicts of Interest in Economic Research”:

Central banks sometimes evaluate their own policies. To assess the inherent conflict of interest, we compare the research findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and inflation. Central bankers are also more likely to report significant effects of QE on output and to use more positive language in the abstract. Central bankers who report larger QE effects on output experience more favourable career outcomes.

Of course, every profession does this, right? If I’m a highly paid executive at Coca-Cola well, then, “Mmmmmm, Coke! It is so delicious and refreshing!” And also: “What cavities?”

“Do people really believe central banks’ upbeat forecasts of inflation returning to their targets anytime soon? Give me a break!”, Albert goes on to exclaim.

The good news is, as long as there’s a disinflationary impulse operating in the background and bond yields stay subdued with plenty of liquidity sloshing around, we won’t have to worry about a macro impediment to ongoing outperformance from the FAAMG ATM.


5 thoughts on “Albert Edwards Doubts Bond Selloff Has Legs. And That’s Good For The FAAMG Bubble

  1. The vaunted inflation really is nowhere in sight. Sure, there is the usual health care costs, tuition, housing prices, and equity markets. But, these don’t count toward the type of inflation that the Fed wants and that every one was trading on just weeks ago…higher CPI and the reflation trade.

    Sure, the stock market is a pull-information forward machine. Any Biden stimulus is late January at the very earliest. And who knows, if the Senate is still in the capture of the great senator from Kentucky, we might not see any decent stimulus.

    No way rates are going up. We in this country (the mainstream punditry) haven’t even started calling this an economic depression yet. There are permanent changes to the economy. Some we see already, like people who lost their jobs, lost their unemployment, and lost their apartments. And those changes we haven’t seen yet, like airline bankruptcy, more bankruptcies, and…and the children who have disappeared from the schools. We’re still in the middle of this catastrophe. …not to mention we’re dependent on credit and at least corporations can keep borrowing, all the more when rates are low low.

    The Fed hates it when real rates increase. They’ll manage expectations or just buy stuff. YCC…psychology and some purchases. They are all we got keeping us from further economic catastrophe.

  2. As the world goes to ZIRP, and long duration cash flows have greater present value, a higher percentage of overall valuations sit in “terminal value” in CAPM models. This is the duration infatuation with tech growth stocks. It’s a good general argument. However, in decomposing the discount rate, the data shows that in addition to a falling “risk-free” rate, equity risk premia have also fallen (I checked Damodaran’s data recently). One would think that long duration valuations should be priced for their greater sensitivity to uncertainty. However, right now the opposite is the case, despite this being a period of historic uncertainty.

    1. It’s a great point, particularly once you consider sectoral uncertainty within Tech. FAAMG stocks seem to have an ‘end of history’ component to their current valuations: having succeeded by disrupting a range of industries, we now believe that no further disruption will take place, or that if it does it will only come from the incumbents themselves.

  3. Agree that deflation/ZIRP, whilst possible for awhile longer is not inevitably sustained here by some invisible decree.

    The bungee cords holding inflation back are temporary figments of the treasury holder’s dreams. Inflation can be manufactured, and on a chosen timeline if the will to take such a harsh measure is there. And those other pandemic-assisted fuel injections of woe that portend deflation right now will succumb “economically” in the face of such action. It can still be very ugly though…which is more beautiful ? A goblin or a troll ?

    just my .02 worth. I’ve got my popcorn ready.

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.