All week long, the market has been preoccupied with the hurried effort to strike a new trilateral trade deal to replace NAFTA, which the Trump administration is intent on renaming in order to dispense with what the President says is a “negative connotation” associated with the old acronym.
There was real progress on that front on Monday as the U.S. and Mexico settled differences on the way to striking a bilateral deal that paved the way for Canada to return to the table. Now, the race is on to come up with an inclusive agreement that will pass muster on Capitol Hill.
The read-through for the trade dispute with China is not good. Trump and administration officials variously indicated that Beijing would “have to wait” now that the ball is rolling with Mexico and Canada (and possibly Europe). That, after low-level negotiations betweenÂ DavidÂ Malpas and a Chinese delegation held earlier this month went nowhere.
The second round of 301 investigation-related tariffs went into effect on 23rd, affecting $16 billion in Chinese goods. That was the second tranche, and brought the total amount of Chinese imports subject to duties in connection with the 301 probe to $50 billion.
The next round is set to see the Trump administration slap tariffs on $200 billion in additional Chinese imports. That would mark the most serious escalation yet and earlier this month, Beijing announced that if Washington moves ahead with that,Â China will impose â€œdifferentiated tariffsâ€ on some $60 billion in U.S. items.
You might recall that late last month, TrumpÂ directed Robert Lighthizer to ponderÂ hiking the proposedÂ tariff rateÂ in the next round to 25% from 10%, an apparent effort to raise the stakes and force China to relent.
Well, on Thursday afternoon, Bloomberg’s Jennifer Jacobs reported that according to a half dozen sources, “Trump has told aides he wants to move ahead with the plan to impose tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese imports as soon as the public-comment period concludes next week.”
To be clear, this is bad news for any number of reasons. First, it has the potential to negate the positive sentiment engendered by the progress on NAFTA. More importantly, it could catalyze a fresh leg weaker in the yuan, which the PBoC has gone to great lengths to stabilize this month. Finally (and we’ve talked about this at length), from here on out, it will be impossible for the administration to avoid a scenario where additional tariffs end up bleeding over into consumer prices.
Last month, SocGenâ€™sÂ Omair Sharif spent quite a bit of time documenting the read-through for inflation if Trump does indeed move forward with tariffs on an additional $200 billion in Chinese goods. â€œUnlike a similar $50 billion list unveiled in April, which was composed largely of industrial supplies and components, the proposed $200 billion tally includes a slew of finished consumer itemsâ€,Â Sharif wrote, referencing the USTR list published last month, before reminding you that â€œaccording to the Peterson Institute, consumer goods account for about $44 billion, or nearly 23%, of the proposed list.â€
He went on to explain what this would mean for inflation as follows:
With about 4.5% of the core CPI subject to a 10% tariff, and assuming that it is entirely passed on to consumers, the impact from the implementation of the tariffs would be around 45 bps on the yoy core CPI rate. As we saw with tariffs on laundry equipment this year, tariffs on household appliances could ripple through into retail prices relatively quickly.
Again, that assessment was based on the assumption of a 10% tariff on the new list. A couple of weeks later,Â Bloomberg quotedÂ SharifÂ on the way to explaining what would happen in the event the tariff rate is 25% in the next round as opposed to 10%. Hereâ€™s the relevant excerpt:
Implementing the tariffs would complicate the Federal Reserveâ€™s decision-making on interest rates. Omair Sharif, an economist at Societe Generale in New York, said a 25 percent tariff on the entire $200 billion product list could cause inflation to surge by 1.1 percentage point. Assuming the levies get passed along to customers, the annual increase in the consumer price index, excluding food and energy, would jump to 3.4 percent from the current rate of 2.3 percent.
As noted there, this muddies the waters for the Fed. If tariffs start to push up consumer prices at a time when inflation is already starting to show nascent signs of overshooting, it could prompt more hawkishness, thus driving the dollar higher and exacerbating the risk-off sentiment that would already accompany heightened trade frictions.
As soon as the headlines hit on Thursday, USDCNH spiked:
This was just about the last thing emerging markets needed on a day when fears of contagion from Argentina and Turkey are showing up across developing economy assets.
One more time: the biggest tail risks right now are a further escalation in the trade conflict between Washington and Beijing and the prospect that any such escalation could prompt a renewed bout of dollar strength.
I hope you enjoyed your stay at all-time highs on U.S. benchmarks, because this certainly undermines the bull case.