iran politics saudi arabia saudi aramco

US To Deploy Troops To Saudi Arabia In Response To Attacks, Esper, Dunford Announce

"Defensive in nature".

"Defensive in nature".
This content has been archived. Log in or Subscribe for full access to thousands of archived articles.

8 comments on “US To Deploy Troops To Saudi Arabia In Response To Attacks, Esper, Dunford Announce

  1. mfn says:

    It’s all about the oil. Same as it ever was.

    • PaulMiller says:

      @mfn: You are too cynical. Don’t you recall the ferocity of their response to the 10 or 11 Saudi Nationals involved in the 9/11 attack? Don’t you remember their contributions in forming OPEC, and raising the price of crude oil about 10 fold in the 70’s ?

      What American family wouldn’t be proud to see a loved one sacrificed in the deserts of the Middle East, preserving the right to be-headings, assassinations, and stoning at the whim of deranged monarchs?

      No, Mr. mfn, when you have a staunch ally in a despot like MBS, you put American lives at risk to help them, just the same as they put Saudi lives at risk defending the USA!

  2. Anonymous says:

    I’m thinking this was why we saw this Repo operation mess all week, and why the Fed announced they’ll be continuing them through October 10th.

  3. privateer says:

    It’s the early 1900’s Balkans all over again. If I were the ME equivalent of an archduke, I’d be packing my bags about now.

  4. Billy Oxygen says:

    No benefit to American citizens; ZERO! Defending the constitution my ass!

  5. Anonymous says:

    Trump pushed hard for the $110B ‘defense deal’ w/ Saudi Arabia in ’17, to include $350B over 10 yrs. Israel has ALSO been ‘gifted’ 100s of $billions in defense deals & weaponry.

    I’m not aware of any mutual Defense Treaty between US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, but I guess if Bennie & MBS tell Trump to defend them, from that which they appear incapapble of defending themselves…. well, ok then, let’s go everyone!…

    On a slightly different note: What was Bin Laden’s claimed reason for 9/11 attacks? Oh… that’s right: US Troops stationed in Saudi.

    I spent 30 yrs in US Military. I’m pretty familiar w/ this snake den, to include DC, Israel, & Saudi Arabia. There’s NO REASON for US to be militarily involved in Saudi, based on these ‘drone attacks.’

    Defend yourselves, you pricks. Re Oil, isn’t USA #1 producer currently? And production wasn’t harmed in Saudi, just some processing…

  6. jamaican says:

    totally agreed.
    Why should it be the US’s job (or anybody else’s) to defend these bloated royals whose penal code is literally the same as ISIS’s?
    Let them fight their own war if they deem it necessary (bet they won’t), they got more than enough military hardware thanks to their “great” deals with the Chosen One.
    No foreign intervention EVER in the Middle East yielded any positive results, it’s only gotten worse.
    And if oil should go to $ 200 / barrel due to armed conflict, it will at least serve to speed up the transformation towards a world powered by renewable energy and render the religious zealots irrelevant.

Leave a Reply to PaulMiller Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar