NY Times: “The World Is Run By A Child”

We have long said there’s a built in check on Trump’s ability to build an autocratic regime in America.

And no, that check isn’t “checks and balances.” Rather, Trump’s capacity to govern by dictatorial decree is constrained by the fact that he’s a simpleton. To quote Tropic Thunder, “an imbecile; like the dumbest motherfucker to ever live.”

To be sure, you can be crazy and be a dictator – in fact, being eccentric is something of a job requirement. Indeed, you can even be kinda, sorta stupid and run an autocratic regime.

But what you can’t be is a complete imbecile. It just doesn’t work.

And as we’ve said time and again, while Trump’s assaults on the press and on the judiciary and on other democratic institutions are indeed worrisome, it’s not always clear that he fully understands the gravity of what he’s doing when he say, threatens to “change libel laws” or calls someone a “so-called judge.”

The same goes for the market-moving things he says and tweets during the trading day. Remember a couple of weeks ago when he said he was considering “breaking up the big banks” seemingly out of the clear blue sky?

Yeah, well do you actually believe he thought about that before he said it? Of course he didn’t. Someone asked him if he was thinking about it and he took that question the same way he would take it if someone asked him the following: “Mr. President, do you ever think about putting chocolate sprinkles on your ice cream?” “Well sure. Sure I do.”

The same goes for the impromptu “phenomenal” tax plan promise he made back in February while talking to airline CEOs. Three months later, that promise has found expression only in a double-spaced, one-pager that looked like it walked right out of a high school student’s Trapper Keeper and into the hands of Gary Cohn at the podium.

And yes, the same goes for revelations that he might have leaked classified information to Sergei Lavrov and Sergey Kislyak. Recall what we said last night when the story first broke:

Here’s a complete government neophyte who also isn’t very smart and then on top of it all, he’s either i) being extorted, or ii) genuinely thinks Moscow likes him. It’s not really clear which of those possibilities is worse, but needless to say, neither of them bode well for national security.

So while that’s obviously horrible, it’s also hilarious.

Because think about it…

There’s really no telling whether Lavrov and Kislyak had to coax this out of him or whether they both just sat back and kind of looked at each other in disbelief as Trump inexplicably volunteered sensitive information.

So with that as the context, consider the following piece out today from The New York Times and whatever you do, don’t show it to Trump, lest he should immediately have a Twitter meltdown.

Via NY Times

At certain times Donald Trump has seemed like a budding authoritarian, a corrupt Nixon, a rabble-rousing populist or a big business corporatist.

But as Trump has settled into his White House role, he has given a series of long interviews, and when you study the transcripts it becomes clear that fundamentally he is none of these things.

At base, Trump is an infantalist. There are three tasks that most mature adults have sort of figured out by the time they hit 25. Trump has mastered none of them. Immaturity is becoming the dominant note of his presidency, lack of self-control his leitmotif.

First, most adults have learned to sit still. But mentally, Trump is still a 7-year-old boy who is bouncing around the classroom. Trump’s answers in these interviews are not very long — 200 words at the high end — but he will typically flit through four or five topics before ending up with how unfair the press is to him.

His inability to focus his attention makes it hard for him to learn and master facts. He is ill informed about his own policies and tramples his own talking points. It makes it hard to control his mouth. On an impulse, he will promise a tax reform when his staff has done little of the actual work.

Second, most people of drinking age have achieved some accurate sense of themselves, some internal criteria to measure their own merits and demerits. But Trump seems to need perpetual outside approval to stabilize his sense of self, so he is perpetually desperate for approval, telling heroic fabulist tales about himself.

“In a short period of time I understood everything there was to know about health care,” he told Time. “A lot of the people have said that, some people said it was the single best speech ever made in that chamber,” he told The Associated Press, referring to his joint session speech.

By Trump’s own account, he knows more about aircraft carrier technology than the Navy. According to his interview with The Economist, he invented the phrase “priming the pump” (even though it was famous by 1933). Trump is not only trying to deceive others. His falsehoods are attempts to build a world in which he can feel good for an instant and comfortably deceive himself.

He is thus the all-time record-holder of the Dunning-Kruger effect, the phenomenon in which the incompetent person is too incompetent to understand his own incompetence. Trump thought he’d be celebrated for firing James Comey. He thought his press coverage would grow wildly positive once he won the nomination. He is perpetually surprised because reality does not comport with his fantasies.

Third, by adulthood most people can perceive how others are thinking. For example, they learn subtle arts such as false modesty so they won’t be perceived as obnoxious.

But Trump seems to have not yet developed a theory of mind. Other people are black boxes that supply either affirmation or disapproval. As a result, he is weirdly transparent. He wants people to love him, so he is constantly telling interviewers that he is widely loved. In Trump’s telling, every meeting was scheduled for 15 minutes but his guests stayed two hours because they liked him so much.

Which brings us to the reports that Trump betrayed an intelligence source and leaked secrets to his Russian visitors. From all we know so far, Trump didn’t do it because he is a Russian agent, or for any malevolent intent. He did it because he is sloppy, because he lacks all impulse control, and above all because he is a 7-year-old boy desperate for the approval of those he admires.

The Russian leak story reveals one other thing, the dangerousness of a hollow man.

Our institutions depend on people who have enough engraved character traits to fulfill their assigned duties. But there is perpetually less to Trump than it appears. When we analyze a president’s utterances we tend to assume that there is some substantive process behind the words, that it’s part of some strategic intent.

But Trump’s statements don’t necessarily come from anywhere, lead anywhere or have a permanent reality beyond his wish to be liked at any given instant.

We’ve got this perverse situation in which the vast analytic powers of the entire world are being spent trying to understand a guy whose thoughts are often just six fireflies beeping randomly in a jar.

“We badly want to understand Trump, to grasp him,” David Roberts writes in Vox. “It might give us some sense of control, or at least an ability to predict what he will do next. But what if there’s nothing to understand? What if there is no there there?”

And out of that void comes a carelessness that quite possibly betrayed an intelligence source, and endangered a country.

Advertisements
Advertisements

6 thoughts on “NY Times: “The World Is Run By A Child”

  1. Our choice was a child or a crook, not much of a choice, i guess this is what you get after 241 years of democracy

    • I didn’t like our two (or three) choices either but I dare say emphatically it was not because Hillary is a crook. I firmly believe she is not a crook. Lord knows she has been investigated several times for many years and not one iota of a charge has ever been proven! Just a bunch of bullshit comments by a bunch of know-nothings has caused her great problems – and she has faced every challenge with vigor. Trump still makes accusations about that uranium crap sold to Russia. I am not going to replay that story; do your own research and you will find she was not in the position to make that “deal”. Ridiculous. I did vote for her but from day one I was concerned if she was electable because of all the years of crap – and she was also covered with the same blanket as her cheating lying husband. Then throw in the 3rd guy, Grandpa Bernie. I like that guy and I believe what he says, mostly. The part I did not like about him was that he pretended to be middle class while owning multiple properties and millions in the bank. I still kinda like him! But he took some votes that would have gone to Hillary. Then Big Mouth Liar came along and to this day he still spouts all his complete lies and rants about her being a crook, making accusations of crimes never committed. His crummy crowds chanting Lock Her Up and spreading malicious lies. And of course you do understand she did receive about 3 million more votes than he did — and it still makes him angry! His campaign people – not him because he is too stupid to figure it out – worked the states with the electoral voters that could put bigger numbers in for him. They successfully figured out how to get the brainless twit elected by a bunch of other brainless twits. It was more of a manipulation than an honest election BUT he won and she did not. I think if Bernie had run under the Democrat banner he would be sitting in the WhiteHouse.

      So, not only you but a few more from Michigan and Wisconsin, made the wrong choice.

    • I think Trump as eliminated all the rational possibilities that would allow any critical thinking person to think he is more than he demonstrates in performing so poorly – daily, consistently, without pause and mostly without understanding why and how he does it. Even the dullest political hack can take good advice. How many “benefits of the doubt” can you give a guy who has daily catastrophic credibility lapses and does it so publicly – even though he has the potential to have the best advice in the world on all matters and decisions available to him – except to accept the advice and be better than he is.

      • Yeah, and I have to wonder about the quality of the advice giver if he sits in the same room and does not intervene in some way OR even worse, stands at a podium afterwards and tell us “it did not happen”. I will never trust another word out of that advisors mouth. Frumpy Boy is void of benefits of doubt at this time – all used up! The other thing I want to say is that instead of good advice in advance of his faux pas, those advisors circle around and make up “logical” explanations as to what was said or perceived. It is insulting to us after so many times! I think Frumpy Boy will end up in jail. That’s how stupid he is.

Leave a Reply