Goldman Doubles Odds Of Auto Tariffs, Calls Trump’s Trade Tantrum ‘Significant Shift’
“This development has incrementally negative implications for the outlook.”
“This development has incrementally negative implications for the outlook.”
This is the story and folks are sticking to it.
“The European Union is almost as bad as China, just smaller.”
In favor, that is.
And the hits just keep comin’.Â
“Needless to say, the Donald’s un-varnished, un-vetted and un-shackled thoughts whims on most any topic are a thing of considerable disruptive potential. But when it comes to trade, his mind beats to the sound of a drummer not from this world or even possibly the next.”
Well, the “reviews” continue to pour in…
Donald Trump will command a majority of headlines in the days ahead, but a bevy
It was easy to miss, buried as it was under an avalanche of domestic political
Here’s an idea: What if new tariffs are deflationary? If you’re inclined to dismiss that
I think I’ve made it abundantly clear by now what I think of US election
Blame China. It worked for the other guy, maybe it can work for us too.
Desperate times, desperate measures. The Biden administration may soon announce targeted rollbacks of some US
“If the US presidential debate had, in election night fashion, flashed up a picture of
Over the weekend, I outlined the rather stark economic choice facing Americans as they go
“But I don’t go around saying, ‘Oh, help me with my election”.
“CIOs expressed varying degrees of concern.”
“Forced to consider the latter, let us not make the same mistake with our investments.”
And no, this isn’t Trump calling off the trade war.
“…declines in services trade during the pandemic may be lost forever.”
Markets continue to throw off a veritable smorgasbord of consequential and amusing headlines.
There’s still hope for stock pickers, though.
The YoY print was, in a word, terrible.
…no matter how fleeting the bounce may prove.
Maybe it only exists in Wilbur’s dreams.
You must be logged in to post a comment.