Who Cares Where You Are In The Capital Structure If The Fed Doesn’t Allow Bankruptcies?
Like many irritable observers, I lost my sense of humor with the Hertz saga in
Like many irritable observers, I lost my sense of humor with the Hertz saga in
“The Fed will set an interest rate for different types of creditors based on its economic objective”.
“Moral hazard!”, everyone shouted, in unison.
“…the odds aren’t in investors’ favor”.
“It would be helpful if you soon began buying in size.”
“…the perfect answer for a central bank dealing with a credit crunch”.
Wicker giraffes and decorative plates.
What happens after that? How do you sort that out? Spoiler alert: You can’t.
Critics will be critics, though.
“…a recession like the one we’re currently in is unprecedented.”
Mnuchin told Sorkin only that Fed buying is “highly unlikely”.
If you’re in the camp that is genuinely offended by monetary largesse, this is going to a rough six months for your sanity.
“Yeah, sport, I know there’s a blizzard.”
“Whether the stimulus is remotely enough remains to be seen”.
“I have numerous concerns”…
“What is the right multiple given the unprecedented earnings hit, but also unprecedented monetary measures?
But “there are believers out there.”
“Money is hierarchical…”
“Most of us believe in the free-market system as the best allocator of resources.”
Respondents see a “U-shaped” recovery, not a “V-shaped” miracle.Â
“The world has indeed changed”.
Crazy times, historic moves.
Platitudes.
“…not randomness run amok, but an essential instability to changes in initial conditions”.
You must be logged in to post a comment.