SEC Comes Knocking At Bored Ape Yacht Club: Bloomberg

Regular readers will fondly (or not) recall my three-month foray into Web3 and decentralized finance. It started back in December, when I was increasingly uncomfortable with owning no Bitcoin and no Ethereum, not because I'd necessarily changed my mind about cryptocurrencies, but rather because they do represent a kind of insurance policy against a number of highly far-fetched outcomes, including a scenario in which, as Thomas Peterffy so eloquently put it, fiat money "goes to hell." Peterffy'

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 thoughts on “SEC Comes Knocking At Bored Ape Yacht Club: Bloomberg

  1. In a past life I was a securities lawyers in big law before becoming an ISDA expert (believe it or not, much more fun and better job security). I think the SEC has enough ground to at least plausibility argue APE coin as well as other DeFi coins are securities subject to registration, that said I really wish they would focus enforcement action on fraudulent activities involving real fiat money and wall street actors, going after Kardasians and NFTs is a waste a legal resources that could be put to better use, this just makes the SEC and Gensler look opportunistic, lazy and petty. Go after the next Archegos, do something that will actually protect investors for a change.

      1. Maybe, but a lot of people have lost a lot of money in DeFi. This space needs to be reined in. I was certainly taken aback at the scope of it myself. I imagine regulators will be too once they get a look at it all.

  2. As I read about this stuff I can’t help thinking that underneath everything we will find the shade of Salvador Dali, laughing at us.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints