Priorities

There's plenty of time between now and the election for The White House and the GOP-controlled Senate to fill the vacancy left by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s passing and cement a conservative majority on the high court for a generation, we're told. Never mind that rushing that decision desecrates Ginsburg’s dying wish and effectively means that the fate of women's reproductive rights as well as the future of America's healthcare system will now be subjected to sham proceedings in the Senate, wher

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply to Tom SwiftCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 thoughts on “Priorities

    1. Of course in Trump’s Machiavellian world the end always justifies the means and all that matters is whether you get caught or not. For most Americans though there is a value placed on doing the right thing and applying principles to ones actions, not just the raw and unabated grasping of power by any means possible. Sure, the republican senate CAN confirm her replacement, but after what they did and said in 2016 with Garland and an election in 6 weeks, has the thought even occurred to you ‘Should they do it?”.

    2. Steve, I cannot even find the words to describe how uncouth it is to parrot talking points that i) cast doubt on Ginsburg’s dictated last wishes while suggesting that ii) if they are true she is trying to “usurp the Constitution”, during a week when the president refused, multiple times, on live television, to commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses. This comment effectively accuses a dying guardian of the Constitution of trying to rip it up. That is, frankly, ridiculous. And it’s an especially unfortunate thing to say at a time when the president is literally suggesting, on a daily basis, that he may take actions that are the very definition of “usurping the Constitution”. Steve, with respect (and I mean that, because I appreciate anyone who spends even a minute of their valuable time reading the site), please do not leave this kind of comment again. As I hope to have just conveyed, it is not the comment itself that is problematic, but rather what you are intimating and the potential for that intimation to translate into misinformation in the minds of some readers.

    3. How are you positioned? I’d love to take the other side of your trades. If you’re letting misinformation get to you, sticking to Money Market accounts or hiring a wealth manager would be advisable.

  1. Apparenty it was too rushed to interview Merrick Garland in March and vote in June in 2016. Magically now there is plenty of time to interview the Trump nominee. The wonders of remote legislating and technology- hats off to Mitch McConnell! (sarcasm)

    1. Mr McConnell would now be more in line with the Constitution and tacitly admitting to a previous treasonous act.
      He swore to uphold the Constitution. Scalia may have seen it this way.
      Both jurist graves have been pissed on by McConnell.

  2. There is a special place in history textbooks (and hell, if you’re into that sort of thing) for spineless “leaders” like Mitch McConnell and his disciples. That said, Mitch is only able to do what Mitch does because Americans are, by and large, thoughtless parrots. When you keep the public un/misinformed and also grant them the ability to elect their officials you reap what you sow. I fear what will happen in/to this country if Trump “wins” re-election.

      1. Be happy H has the depth, insight and personal values to help us with “Life Construction,” through reviewing political developments – which, after all, are his forte borne of his pedigree.

  3. Politics, including geo-politics, matters, to investment portfolios. DB, GS, BoA, MS, have deep research benches whose letters spill ink on politics. The letters speak in probabilities and they don’t call it politics. I suspect the institutions spend money on this because ultra-rich clients want to know how to position should political scenario A occur compared to scenario B.

    For example, Alexander Kocic is a derivatives analyst (more than that, of course), but he spends a lot of time discussing the fracturing of our political system. I’m suspecting that his models have variables to explain variance in possible, future outcomes.

    Another example is for the pedestrian, of which I consider myself. Taxes and the Roth IRA. Enjoy the tax free, future benefits now and put as much in as you can for if tax policy changes, due to who gets into office, and taxes go up, policy relating to Roth IRAs could change. Say it gets capped or they eliminate it. Bye bye to some tax-free income in retirement.

    A whole other angle of why politics matters is the threat to the rule of law in the U.S. If this election doesn’t go well, shall we just put a fork into the U.S. for a while? Or wait for it to get better? How long to wait, 2028, 2032?

    This period is a macro-investors dream. I can’t bribe and pay off politicians. Nor do I have access to insider information. My only choice is to pay attention and try to position.

  4. I think Trump got a reality check when he and Melania went to pay respects (photo opp??) and got loudly booed by the non paid Trump supporter crowd he’s not used to. The only time in US history a standing President got booed off the stage paying respects to a true icon??

  5. I wouldn’t read a Market Risk blog that doesn’t discuss politics. The context provided in this article highlights where the governing party’s priorities lie: not in the economic welfare of the US population but rather the enrichment of the rich. The longer this continues, the longer I allocate a large portion of my portfolio to cash, waiting for companies’ bottom lines to be impacted by widespread loss of domestic purchasing power and for home/car/credit defaults to start in earnest.

    I haven’t seen many articles that discuss or suggest a form of Portfolio Construction. That’s up to you.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints