bonds gold Markets oil

Tech Wars, Great Debasements, And A $2.4 Trillion ‘Non-Starter’

A July jobs report billed ahead of time as a potential game-changer for a market desperately searching for something definitive on the macro front offered more ambiguity instead.

Yes, the headline print was a beat and no, there didn’t appear to be anything too nefarious hiding in the numbers, but the crosscurrents on Friday were strong. Donald Trump escalated the tech war with China via a pair of alarmist executive orders, while sanctions on officials including Carrie Lam unnerved market participants, who have otherwise demonstrated a predisposition for ignoring Sino-US escalations over the summer.

Tech shares underperformed to close the week, as Tencent’s tumble appeared to weigh on investor psychology. Especially hard-hit were Chinese tech ADRs, including Alibaba and JD.com, each of which dropped precipitously.

Buried underneath an otherwise lackluster session was a solid performance for small-caps, banks, and other laggards, which outperformed, presumably on a combination of the jobs beat and the assumption that one way or another (i.e., whether it’s through legislation or more executive orders) additional stimulus is coming for the US economy.

Tech wasn’t the only recent winner to give some back. Gold slipped on Friday, while the dollar rose.

“A number of crowded cross-asset trades built upon the edifice of low yields and flat curves could see over-positioning/deleveraging risks on even a short-term bond selloff and/or steepening over the coming months”, Nomura’s Charlie McElligott said. “Crowded longs in gold [could] get hit if we were to see real yields jump higher into a broader fixed-income selloff [and] very popular USD shorts similarly risk getting hurt if we see US nominal- /real- yields spasm higher”, he added.

Treasurys bear-steepened at the margins and yields ended near their cheapest levels of the week, which isn’t saying much. A 3bps move to the upside for 10-year yields was the first rise in five weeks. That’s all we could muster despite a quarterly refunding statement that received plenty of attention.

Gold’s Friday slump didn’t stop the yellow metal from logging another weekly gain. With US real yields deeply negative, the case for bullion remains intact.

“Gold has always had a dynamic relationship with its drivers — at times the focus is on real rates, then it’s on the dollar, and there’s always geopolitical risk to think about”, Bloomberg’s Eddie van der Walt remarked, adding that “sometimes, as is the case now, the chosen narrative creates a self-perpetuating rally”.

Until Friday, gold had only fallen in one out of the 15 trading days since pushing through $1,800.

Crude, meanwhile, managed a weekly gain despite an uninspiring final session. Baker Hughes said active oil rigs in the US dropped by four, bringing the total to just 176.

Two weeks back, one lonely rig was added. Suffice to say that did not mark the beginning of a trend. Exploration is now at a 15-year nadir.

“Gold is at $2,032, WTI Crude $41.30, 10-year TIPS breakevens are 161 bp, core-PCE -1.1%, and since March 23, copper +40%, DXY down 9%, and Bitcoin is up 104%”, BMO’s Ian Lyngen remarked, in a Friday afternoon note declaring that “the great debasement has begun”.

Indeed, Fed largesse is feeding through to dollar weakness and, in turn, higher prices for hard assets, commodities, and “alternatives” (which I’ll use as a polite euphemism for the crypto universe).

“XBT is, of course, the anti-currency on a variety of levels”, Lyngen added, before noting that “the most striking aspect of these trends is that they’ve managed to occur during a period with Treasury yields extremely low and drifting lower”.

And that, folks, is key. Jerome Powell is proving that, as unpalatable as it most assuredly is for any old school “bond vigilantes”, yields are a policy variable for credible central banks hell-bent on exercising control. This is crucial at a time when deficits need monetizing.

Speaking of deficits, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Steve Mnuchin, and Mark Meadows made little progress Friday. As of the closing bell on Wall Street, “stalemate” was still the headline around fraught stimulus talks.

Pelosi offered Mnuchin a compromise that would entail a $2.4 trillion trillion price tag on the new relief package, halfway between the Republican and Democratic positions. “The House does not have the votes to go south of $2 trillion”, Schumer said.

Mnuchin called the $2.4 trillion figure “a non-starter”.

Trump, it would appear, will be forced to take executive action — whatever that ends up meaning in this context.


 

4 comments on “Tech Wars, Great Debasements, And A $2.4 Trillion ‘Non-Starter’

  1. If Trumps actions don’t put food on the table and keep the wolf from the door there may well be some serious demonstrations and violence, Which may be what he wants. He’s itching to show he’s a man of law and order and quelling the anger of the hungry and dispossessed may be what he thinks will get him re-elected.

    • calh0025 says:

      I’m not entirely sure how one quells a few dozen million homeless people. That seems like a recipe for failure. I suppose it wouldn’t be a Trump presidency if there was anything left but ash, tears and debt.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Marko would be pleased at today’s action but don’t read too much into it. Just an overdue reversion to the mean day.

    Growth is going to remain challenged and elusive and value will remain in a funk. Need growth for a sustained move there.

    The complacency is shocking. There will probably be a rude awakening soon.

    This is not normal and the Fed is just making a future big mistake that will be a larger hole we’ll need to try ( and prob fail) to get out of.

    We’ll see if this money printing is really the holy grail or if we’ll be run out on the rail.

    Watch you don’t stick around too long picking up nickels.

  3. Vlad is Mad says:

    either stimulus does not matter (doubtful) or markets just assumes a messy compromise is days away (likely) because how else does one explain why equities are not 10% lower, or do you just say that the new utilities (tech) are what holds up averages?

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar