mueller sam clovis Trump

Not Being A Scientist Wasn’t Enough To Keep Sam Clovis From Being ‘Chief Scientist’ But Treason Was A Bridge Too Far

Sorry, Sam. If the "I'm not really a scientist" bit doesn't get ya, the "I may have committed a little bit of treason" bit surely will...

Sam Clovis has formally withdrawn from the race to be the Department of Agriculture’s chief scientist.

Clovis was the Trump campaign’s former national co-chair and there are couple of common sense reasons why he might have decided that the position doesn’t suit him.

First of all, he doesn’t posses any actual academic credentials in science or agriculture. So that being the case, maybe top scientist in the literal Department of Agriculture isn’t a good fit. Earlier today, WaPo published a letter Clovis sent to the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee’s top Democrat, Debbie Stabenow. Asked to list “all graduate level courses you have taken in natural science”, Clovis responded as follows:


Asked to “describe any awards, designations, or academic recognition you have received specifically related to agricultural science”, Clovis responded in a remarkably similar fashion. To wit:


You can read the hilarious letter embedded below that finds Clovis attempting to explain why, despite having no advanced education in natural science and no expertise to speak of in the field of agriculture, he is nevertheless a good candidate for the job.

As WaPo dryly notes, the 2008 farm bill specifies that appointees to the position should be chosen “from among distinguished scientists with specialized training or significant experience in agricultural research, education, and economics,” given that the official is “responsible for the coordination of the research, education, and extension activities of the Department.”

Of course if you want to know the real reason Clovis is no longer interested in the post, look no further than this tweet from AP (who broke the story):

See Sam was George Papadopoulos’s supervisor on the Trump campaign. That would be the same Papadopoulos who is now a cooperating witness in the Mueller probe.

Clovis was identified only as a “campaign supervisor” in the court documents unsealed on Monday. Those documents describe emails between Clovis and Papadopoulos and as it turns out, ol’ Sam at one point responded “Great work” when Papadopoulos talked about his interactions with Kremlin surrogates who sought to set up a meeting with Trump and Putin reps.

Obviously, those revelations cast considerable doubt on whether Clovis should get a job he was in no way qualified for in the first place and indeed the above-mentioned Debbie Stabenow told USA Today that she had “serious concerns” about his nomination in light of recent events. To wit:

The emerging information about his role in the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia raises serious concerns.

Now Clovis is throwing in the towel, presumably so as not to have to suffer the humiliation of going through a confirmation hearing during a time when he’s implicated in the Mueller probe.

Sorry, Sam. If the “I’m not really a scientist” bit doesn’t get ya, the “I may have committed a little bit of treason” bit surely will…




5 comments on “Not Being A Scientist Wasn’t Enough To Keep Sam Clovis From Being ‘Chief Scientist’ But Treason Was A Bridge Too Far

  1. Would this be the first or last time this has occurred on either side of the fence?

  2. In the Cheeto bullpen, you can take your pick: (A) self-dealing, unqualified creeps with screaming conflicts of interest (Mnuchin, Ross, Cohn, Price) or (B) unqualified, talentless numbskulls (DeVos, Pruitt, Perry, Carson).

    Clovis fits neatly into group (B).

    • Or, really, (C): rewarded for doing something illegal on behalf of Drumpf/RNC. Just wait for it.

  3. The justice fork is ready for insertion in to the Thanksgiving Turkey – that is Trump – both he and his largely unqualified administration (Clovis being one of many) as they have long been “done” – and are now being burned by Mueller. There now should be zero doubt there was extensive and broad ranging collusion between the Trump campaign and Putin’s Russia. One can only guess what kind of quid quo pros that Putin will require of Trump. The level of influence by Russia trolls in social media is staggering. If a legal case had this much media interference – a miss trial would have to be declared long ago. The question as to why the 2016 Presidential election has not been declared an illegal election – hangs in the air like a pregnant and flatulent turkey – with only the self-interest of Senior Republicans keeping this near flightless Russian Trump bird aloft.

    The question now is begged as to just how far the Russian collusion intent goes into the Republican Party and especially its senior leadership. Should we just address them now as “Russia-publicans?” We clearly have a Russian Puppet Republican President occupying the Oval Office whose presidency was bought and paid for largely by Russia. While it is undeniable that the US has been involved in the political engineering of many countries in its past – that is a different problem, than having the US ruled by a foreign asset who has clearly and openly favored Russian interests since coming into office. Both problems (Trump’s Russian engineered Presidency, and the campaign and election system/the people running it that enabled this breech of laws and Constitution) need to be addressed, Until it is American democracy if not dead – is a total sham. Our current illegal President and the internationally monetized campaign and election process/industry that brought him to Office should be our first correction priority – as soon as Trump the Russian Puppet is removed.

Speak On It

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar