Well, count former FX trader Richard Breslow among those who think you probably shouldn’t worry too much about US airstrikes on Syria.
In fact, Breslow is out on Friday chiding folks for reacting the way they did. “You shouldn’t program your algorithms based on not liking the guy,” Breslow says in Friday’s missive, deriding anyone who might have questioned whether missile strikes were conducted too hastily.
You can read Breslow’s entire note below, and while we would generally agree with his premise, the idea that the NFP number is going to be what matters today is obviously a laughable assertion.
Via Bloomberg
Obviously traders are nervous. We’ve been talking about it all week. But it’s unlikely that the U.S. crippling an air base from which chemical weapon atrocities were launched will be a defining moment in whether markets crack or not. In fact, I thought the initial reaction was ridiculously overdone.
- There have been expressions of horror at the attacks the Syrian government carried out on helpless civilians, including children. No shortage of calls for something to be done. By people across the spectrum of political opinion. So something was done
- Be careful in extrapolating a proportional response into a therefore inevitable replay of previous Middle-East misadventures just because you’re hoping this will help your bond position go your way
- The most laughable explanation I heard for why the market reacted as it did was, “It was so sudden. Did he really think this through? Or have other motives? Is he stable?” Get a grip. You shouldn’t program your algorithms based on not liking the guy
- The same people telling me to sell S&P futures on this were arguing a few weeks ago that adverse market reactions to terrorist incidents are always a good buying opportunity
- If anything, there have been more bipartisan expressions of support than for anything the U.S. administration has done to date. So it is possible. How often do you get Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Paul Ryan and John McCain agreeing on something?
- And if it leads to an actual comprehensive plan on what should be done in the region, alongside a commitment to consult Congress before any true escalation, all the better
- Will today’s non-farm payroll report move markets one way or another? Probably. Does the Fed’s plans for its balance sheet, whatever they might end up being, have enormous implications for assets of all stripes? You bet. Tax reform, health care and European politics are among loads of reasons for investor anxiety. Last night’s events shouldn’t be among them
Richard should keep in mind is the one truly scary thing about this is we now have Russian and US warplanes interacting in a fairly small airspace with no means of deconflicting them. The chance of a high stakes mistake are much higher.
Wasn’t Breslow, ,more or less, correct though? Futures reacted and then recovered (faster reaction functions?) in a somewhat mild manner.
NFP was way short, bring futures back down and market is currently flat. Doesn’t seem like strikes mattered that much, unless they presage more conflict with China re: North Korea.
PS – The US and Russia have been rubbing elbows in this small air space for some time. Doubt this development changes that one way or the other. High stakes have been in place.