McElligott Sees ‘Absolutely Remarkable US Growth Renaissance’

Earlier this week, I noted that major Wall Street banks are beginning to speak as though+ they believe the declining odds of a US recession might've kicked the can on the most widely-telegraphed downturn in modern history into the indefinite future. In other words: That US recession which was part and parcel of every macro playbook headed into 2023 may not be coming at all, where "at all" means by the time it arrives, it'll be too late to vindicate consensus. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tracker f

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 thoughts on “McElligott Sees ‘Absolutely Remarkable US Growth Renaissance’

  1. Could it be that 2022 bear market was simply reflecting the mini-seudo recession we already had? It appears to me a hard landing is still possible but only if the Fed over does their hiking for longer plan.

  2. “Inflation and wage growth may be moderating, but the Fed is avowedly after a below-trend pace of growth.”

    I think what the Fed wants, and what the Fed is willing to do to achieve it, are not matched. The Fed’s economists are like other economists, with the same data, models, and experience set, so they still think a recession is looming. The Fed governors have lost confidence in their models, fallen back on data dependency, and are afraid of creating a recession, so as long as inflation looks like it is ticking down, they will hold fire.

    Just my opinion, and I have no more window into Powell’s mind than anyone else, but I’ve thought for a couple months now that the Fed has ceased being something that investors need to fear, which means that bubbles of over-exuberance have carte blanche to run.

    Not forever – nothing runs forever – but basically if big tech earnings/guides are “good enough” then those stocks can keep running, and if cyclical earnings/guides are not “too bad” and the economy continues to upside then those stocks can start running.

    I’m hoping it’s the latter, because you can still own some of those cyclical stocks without abandoning valuation discipline – mostly, anyway, and especially downcap.

    Either way, the traditional defensive sectors are hard to own here, and ditto the names who’ve relied on high inflation for growth.

    1. Clarify: by “hold fire” I mean just 25 or 50 bp more. Since that will bring FF > core PCE inflation, and Fed thinks rates are already restrictive, there’s little reason to think FF goes higher after Sept. I.e. Fed is about to leave the playing field.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints