‘No Landing’ Becomes Consensus

If you ask Loretta Mester, demand across the US economy isn't weakening as much as some might've thought. Or perhaps "might've hoped" is more apt. "Nothing right now is leading me to think I need to be focused on that question," Mester said Thursday, when asked about a prospective pause in the Fed's hiking campaign. "My focus really is on [getting] policy in that sufficiently restrictive stance, so that inflation is moving down sustainably to 2%." To reiterate the key point from "Finding The N

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply to mfnCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

16 thoughts on “‘No Landing’ Becomes Consensus

  1. Brainard, the leading Fed dove, is going to the White House. Even if replaced by one of like mind, that new dove won’t have Brainard’s influence on the FOMC for some time, if ever. Thus it seems the Fed may tilt a little more hawkish.

    On the mathematical impact of rates on valuation, something to consider is that if the long-run inflation expectation rises to 3% instead of 2%, then investors may be tempted to raise the terminal growth rates in their valuation models, which are built on nominal growth. Bumping terminal growth by +100bp will mechanically but substantially lift valuations.

    That said, it looks like the 10 year has a date with >4% and rising 10 year has un-coincidentally coincided with market downdrafts in the past year.

  2. All very sensible sounding.

    The lynchpin is a continued shortage of labor. I might say “shortage” because how many of those much-touted job openings are for service jobs no one really wants? Like working at a physical & emotionally draining position at a nursing home for $11 an hour?

    A homework assignment for Mester and Bullard: when you are out eating or shopping at a venue with a “We’re Hiring” sign, ask to see the listings, the specifics. Details like are you only offering part-time or split shift positions? How many are 40+ hours per week? It would be a fun detective project for them!

    Without a fast relaxation of immigration augmented by the efforts to lower the minimum working age requirements in many red states, will those jobs ever be filled? Maybe there are just too many enterprises still out there that are only financially viable if they can pay $8 an hour to part-timers. Wouldn’t free market adherents agree that those businesses should just shut their doors now?

    1. If that (unprofitable unless $8/hr to PTE) describes a whole industry, then it seems likely that prices will be forced up, maybe through industry consolidation. Unless the US imports cheap foreign labor en masse (unlikely, politically) or technology swoops in quickly (where’s the VC interest in bed-pan changing and toilet-cleaning robots).

    2. If a business cannot pay a living wage, then it should shut it’s doors.

      People should not be held, effectively, in a state of indentured servitude.

      There are no easy answers, but modern day slavery is no answer at all.

  3. I have tracked the “all-in” costs for undergraduate studies (tuition, room, board, fees, books etc.) to attend 20 US top-tier universities over an 8 year period beginning with the 2014/2015 school year. The average cost for those 20 schools, before scholarships or tuition assistance, was $60,184 for the 2014/2015 school year. For the 2022/2023 school year, the average cost for the same group of 20 schools was $78,607. The rate of increase ramged from 2% to 7% annually over this 8 year period, and, on average, equates to a 3.4% annual increase in costs.
    CPI is out of date because the CPI bucket no longer seems to match current spending patterns nor does the CPI bucket adequately take into consideration disinflationary items.

    1. How many people are attending top-tier universities and more importantly, how many are paying the “all-in” sticker price? Some families pay that full amount and others are paying virtually nothing. Most are paying some significant discount to the full price.

  4. Most reading this will not like this solution to inflation, but I will say it anyway:
    Reduce the social welfare backstop to a level that encourages people to work, increase immigration to match job openings and significantly increase oil production.

    1. Also, tax the heck out of the rich who suck the blood out of everyone else.

      What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

      If people must be “encouraged” to work at meaningless low pay jobs, then the rich can pay their fair share in taxes.

      Misery loves company, and no one needs to break their back so that Elon can have a 12th child.

  5. I was in the soft landing crowd but have changed sides to Mester’s team. There is nothing, in my day-to-day reality, to suggest that inflation is cooling. Everything is too damn expensive.

  6. Anecdote: I decided that with PC prices crashing and DRAM at a buck, it must be a great time to replace my three-year old workstation. I priced out the same brand, equivalent model, similar point in the CPU hierarchy, same graphics cards, etc. The price works out to be +30% more than I paid on Feb 24, 2020. What the . . . conclusion: for this commodity-like good, inflation may be negative MOM and YOY but PC prices haven’t crashed nearly enough.

  7. While housing may be the one easily identifiable (for most people) sector that’s so far “responded reliably” to the Fed’s interest rate increases, I work in the closely related sector of commercial real estate (including rental apartments). I can tell you this sector has been in a state of shock since 3Q22 and values/transactions have been thoroughly beaten down. “Higher for longer” (vs. a nearly 14+ year capital structure built on near zero interest rates) is going to absolutely hammer the commercial real estate sector.

    1. Commercial Real Estate (after 2020’s shock) is going through a permanent structural change – remote working isn’t going back into the toothpaste tube. Many white collar workers just sit in front of a computer all day – and there’s hard data of a year of “stay at home” that it’s still productive enough.
      For real efficiency consider all the time lost commuting, fuel burned and vehicle wear, parking lots, dry cleaning, etc.

      Like any auction/market, without bidding, the downtown skyscrapers and anywhere else to stuff humans together so they sit in cubicles are overbuilt for demand.
      Sadly, I sincerely doubt they can be converted to the much needed housing.

  8. H

    Thanks for the Jones chart. That was very enlightening. I lived thru the real hawk period with Volcker in charge. Given how tough it was for even those rates to knock down the inflation monster, and given the info in the table, we’ve got a ways to go if we really want to tame prices this time.

    1. I think you are right on! We have a ways to go with interest rates if you look at historical numbers. We have been living in Nirvana for about 15 years and that is just not normal.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints