The Rebirth Of The American Subject
With time, America has become a country with vanishingly few paths out of poverty (or even out of the working class) and after several centuries of the American dream, the direct lineage from the early settlers and risk-takers -- the committed aficionados of luck -- found themselves at the bottom of the social ladder which gave birth to the culture of victimhood. — Read more from NOTES FROM DISGRACELAND and follow on Twitter
30. XII 2022
We are not alcoholics because we drink; we drink be
Globalization caused the interests of our ruling class and our ruled to diverge. The ruling class aligned with their fellow elites abroad and got richer as the industrial interior was hollowed out. The ruled were left to handouts, alcohol, and illegal drugs. The callousness of our ruling class is exemplified by their permitting the indigent, the drug-addicted, and the psychiatrically troubled to roam the streets without proper, long-term treatment and criminals to rob and prey upon the poorest among us. It’s a sad situation that none of our “leaders” cares to address. The fact that many people would not be happy with this state affairs should not be surprising, and they should not bear blame for a situation they did not cause.
Ha, I just asked H, tongue-in-cheek, to post something on determinism… and here we are! Almost like it was predestined.
I liked this and want to comment more, but once my kids are asleep! For now I gotta send Bjarne this link. He’s probably read it, but maybe it’s been a long time, it’s a classic on American conspiracy: https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/
Bjarne’s article I will save as my last meditation of the year.
Thank you so much for the Harpers article. I grew up in a house where John Birch literature was available to me from the time I was able to read. That, thankfully, was balanced with many other things I was able to get my hands on.
I am not comfortable with political climate we live in, but I do believe that this may very well pass as it has before. Maybe.
Resentment. How people remember their own personal past and present tempers how they view the present and the future. Denial is a wonderful survival mechanism, but its misuse is the fuel of such movements.
I giggled at the mention of Morse as I instantly related it to Musk.
I went to OpenAI ChatGPS and entered: “Summarize the Harpers article The Paranoid Style in American Politics”. In seconds here is what was printed:
The “Paranoid Style in American Politics” is an article written by American historian Richard Hofstadter and published in Harper’s Magazine in November 1964. In the article, Hofstadter discusses the role of paranoia and conspiracy theories in American politics. He argues that the paranoid style is characterized by “heated exaggeration, suspiciousness, and conspiratorial fantasy,” and has a long history in American politics, dating back to the country’s founding.
Hofstadter contends that the paranoid style is often associated with right-wing movements, and is driven by a belief in a vast and insidious conspiracy against a particular group or ideology. He notes that this conspiracy is often seen as being led by a small, secretive group of elites who are working to subvert the values and traditions of the country.
The article goes on to discuss various examples of the paranoid style in American politics, including the McCarthyism of the 1950s, the John Birch Society, and the militia movement of the 1990s. Hofstadter argues that the paranoid style is fueled by a sense of powerlessness and a belief that mainstream institutions are corrupt and cannot be trusted.
Overall, the “Paranoid Style in American Politics” is a thought-provoking and insightful examination of the role of paranoia and conspiracy theories in American politics. It highlights the ways in which these beliefs can shape political discourse and action, and offers a cautionary tale about the dangers of allowing these beliefs to go unchecked.
I then hit the “Regenerate” button and got a new summary….
“The Paranoid Style in American Politics” is an essay by historian Richard Hofstadter, published in Harper’s Magazine in 1964. In the essay, Hofstadter examines the phenomenon of paranoid thinking in American politics, and how it has manifested itself throughout the country’s history. He argues that the paranoid style is characterized by a sense of extreme and misplaced suspicion, and a belief in conspiracies and plots against the group or individual holding these beliefs. Hofstadter notes that the paranoid style has been present in American politics since the country’s founding, and has been present on both the left and the right of the political spectrum. However, he suggests that it has become more prevalent in recent years, and has been particularly evident in the rise of the far right and the John Birch Society. Hofstadter concludes by arguing that the paranoid style is ultimately harmful to American democracy, as it leads to a polarization of the political landscape and a willingness to accept extreme and often baseless ideas.
Interesting Harpers article. However, where he sees paranoia, I see, mostly, deliberate fearmongering by those who understand that a frightened populace is easier to rule, and don’t care how fast and loose that goal requires them to play with facts.
BTW, another interesting and revealing take on the mindset and values motivating some of today’s more seemingly irrational political movements was published by historian Walter Russell Mead in 1999, and manages to both identify what was to come in the next 20 years of American political currents as if he had already seen it himself, and trace its roots back 200 years. https://web.archive.org/web/20130817202501/http://denbeste.nu/external/Mead01.html
“While, in the feudalized and territorialized old Europe every strip of arable land had had an owner for thousand years, and every forest path, cobblestone or bridge was subject to age-old rights of way and restrictive privileges in favor of some princely exploiter,” – this could just as well describe our modern day housing market right down to the zoning rules just with a different timeframe.
This article expresses a reality that i have come to perceive through the study of regional history initially driving my teenage challenge questions up until to this day against the dynamic static quo, and that has indeed led to hostility and missed opportunity time and again. As a kid here the mere mention of the other side of the story was quasi antisocial even in the best of exchanges. This article helps me better understand the framework of it all. I believe in entropy, and this too shall pass.
Thanks H.
Here is perspective on yet another group (the Generation Zs) who are also disillusioned and culturally falling into a “victimhood” mentality within our society. Frightening.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-national-crisis-of-generation-z-jonathan-haidt-social-media-performance-anxiety-fragility-gap-childhood-11672401345
Bjarne, I have very much missed your notesfromdisgraceland posts. You may not recall my comments to previous posts, but it’s a pleasure to receive again the thoughtful perspectives and the useful challenges you describe. As in previous years, I will try to be a thoughtful respondent.
We’re only beginning to utilize the potential of this thing called the Internet. Just my opinion, but your voice is one that helps to fill gaps in perspective and provoke conversation in a potentially far-reaching public square. You have certainly encouraged me to think beyond my immediate views, and more in the light of history and possibility, which Americans (me included) tend to consider only to the extent we must, or to the extent we’re provoked.
To your point, the abundance of the English (and French) who came to North America, once they arrived and situated on North American soil, looked askance upon Native Americans. Your note begins with a theme that sums up the hard truth illuminated in your post:
If only America was actually a divine experiment! America presented a new reality to the colonists. The story shared by my junior high and high-school history teachers focused on the fact that many of the first English colonists were Quakers, as noted by History.com:
”
But there is so much more to the story. Though my instructors focused more on the Quakers and largely failed to share details about earlier wars with the tribal nations. Here’s a brief list of battles between early colonists and tribal nations residing in New England at the time, as listed by Wikipedia. None of these particular wars were called out in my lessons.
Beaver Wars (1609–1701) between the Iroquois and the French, who allied with the Algonquians.
Anglo-Powhatan Wars (1610–14, 1622–32, 1644–46), including the 1622 Jamestown Massacre, between English colonists and the Powhatan Confederacy in the Colony of Virginia.
Pequot War of 1636–38 between the Pequot tribe and colonists from the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Connecticut Colony and allied tribes.
Kieft’s War (1643–45) in the Dutch territory of New Netherland (New Jersey and New York) between colonists and the Lenape people.
Peach Tree War (1655), the large-scale attack by the Susquehannock and allied tribes on several New Netherland settlements along the Hudson River.
Esopus Wars (1659–63), conflicts between the Esopus tribe of Lenape Indians and colonial New Netherlanders in Ulster County, New York
King Philip’s War (Metacom’s Rebellion) (1675–78) in New England between colonists and the local tribes including, but not limited to, the Nipmuc, Wampanoag, and Narragansett
The Algonquin tribes had presence across much of Canada and in the Midwest. There’s a town near Chicago called Algonquin, which abuts the Fox River. It’s painful to consider the truth of this history, which doesn’t even account for the tribal nations in the western US. The sheer volume of death and destruction upon the tribes, which they no doubt returned as much as possible in defending themselves, was a tragic and sad time in American history, which to this day inspires infinite regret.
Not since I attended the university in the late 1970s have I encountered the French term “ressentiment.” My major courses of study were English and Social Sciences. But the university had an amazing philosophy department where I partook in existential phenomenology classes. The instructors were all doctors of their discipline, having studied in Cologne, Louvain, Fribourg, and Vienna. At the time, ressentiment was spelled differently — exactly the same as resentment. But it had a more complex meaning that I don’t completely remember. I recall it taught me not to avoid being consumed.
I’ve always been drawn to the themes in your writings, Bjarne. To my thinking, human beings (myself included), egocentric as we are, unconsciously assume we know and understand all that our lives require. It’s not a conscious thought. We must make this assumption because we can’t hold all of our knowledge in the conscious mind at all times.
“Tired of self-abuse, anesthetized by drugs and alcohol, disillusioned white males have taken permanent residence in a conflicting configuration between life as they wanted it and life as it has been.”
I live in a condo building, which is well above the ground. But its effectiveness as a shelter differs only a bit from the caves of early homo-sapiens and Neanderthals, who used fire, wore clothes, built shelters, engaged in ritual, created ornamental objects and art, etcetera. The biggest differences in my residence are that my condo pumps water to my unit, it has windows, it is temperature-controlled and dry, and I did not paint the art on my walls.
We humans get by. Consciously or unconsciously, our perspectives are skewed. We kid ourselves, inflating the value of our individual knowledge, experience, and accomplishments. The truth is that what we actually “know” and accomplish and perceive is relatively little within the scope of our lives and awareness. We have self-awareness, an ego, and we are conscious of consciousness. But we are not far from the beasts.
The American wounded have lived in the United States for as long as I can remember. I cannot help but think of our former president call him out as the King of the American wounded. So many people he seduced so easily and dragged with him into his cesspool domain.
In Chicago area, where I live, we have more than our share of mindlessness and self-pitying white men. I’m just outside of Chicago, which has a history of long-standing, systematic prejudice, pushing aside non-whites in education and work. The consequences of organized disenfranchisement, which we still see today, manifests in drug wars, large proportions of armed robberies, drug deaths, and shooting deaths.
While the history of prejudice in Chicago is deeply entrenched, freedom means that undereducated, self-serving, narrow-minded, prejudiced peoples can roam freely. Prior to the presidency of The Missing Link, those confused, misguided, mob-oriented peoples had no guiding voice and did not know the difference between conservative and radical. Many of them did not even vote. Back then I did not fear them.
The awful difficulty I have is that change in the city where I live is painfully incremental, difficult, slow, and scarcely perceptible. All of my life I’ve expected to see positive change. But even with a black woman as mayor and a sympathetic governor, the city continues to provide less than adequate education, and experiences high levels of gun crime. The political culture across the state and within the state government has not been up to the task of fully correcting long-standing wrongs. Independent and political efforts are being made in the city and beyond the city to provide meaningful support to educational and religious institutions and to the city’s disenfranchised.
Of course, the average American has neither the patience or the vocabulary to understand this. When explaining what I was doing to various bosses when I worked on Wall Street, at least half of them needed a presentation suitable for a 14 year old girl. Which doesn’t mean they were bad traders. They just had poor impulse control, like all of us…..