Tudor Jones, Rogoff Deliver The Doom

The big names were out and about on the eve of what's widely expected to be the largest Fed hike in decades. As is custom, they (the big names) indulged the media with headline-friendly soundbites. "You can’t think of a worse environment than where we are right now for financial assets," Paul Tudor Jones told CNBC. "Clearly you don’t want to own bonds and stocks," he added. That's certainly been true over the past several months. Q1 w

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply to RIACancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 thoughts on “Tudor Jones, Rogoff Deliver The Doom

  1. If we get to 4 or 5% on Fed Funds I think we’ll be talking about depression and QE4ever in 12 months (especially when inflation numbers are comp’d). I’m not even sure this economy can handle 3%. Imagine what companies will do with hiring, layoffs, wages, investment, etc if their stocks are down 20, 30, 40% more. This so reminds me of the Bernanke moment in 2007……………………………………. Imagine what housing prices will do with higher mortgage rates and most people’s down payments evaporating (as stocks face mult compression and declining earnings). Though the economy is in a better place, and balance sheets are in better shape (in general) execs will still focus on their stock comp so I expect a major retrenchment while the the vast majority of workers once again feel the brunt and the hollowing out of the “middle class” continues once again. Core CPI, PCE will likely be posting negative numbers for a time in 2023. Stephanie Kelton might just be talked about once again………………………………….

  2. This is exactly why I have decided to stay invested. I think our economy, inflation, interest rates, employment will, one way or another, normalize in less than 12-18 months and the stock market will start responding to that in advance.

    In my mind, “normalize” means monetary and fiscal largesse- as things looked prior to covid- when US government was spending about $1T more than they collected in revenues and interest rates were kept low.

    If job openings do not get filled- we are going to have to finally adopt an immigration policy that intelligently responds to the country’s needs. We also might have to drill/frack and finally establish a plan to transition to renewables/nuclear.
    I would vote for (almost) anyone who prioritizes making these things happen.

  3. The range of outcomes is wide, given what is going on in the real world. The longer I invest for a living the less I know for sure.

  4. This will sound extreme but I don’t think we will ever get back to the “normal”, pre-COVID19, pre-Ukraine world.
    Investing for the long term, anything greater than 5 years, feels too risky.

    1. What if, instead of purchasing bonds, the fed purchased mRNA vaccines and gave them to China? Of course Xi jinping would not accept that, but that would be the most cost effective way of addressing inflation in goods and ” normalizing ” the supply chain.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints