fed fomc Markets

Vice Chair Clarida Delivers Friday Snoozer As Fed Looks To Coast Into October Rate Cut

Don't tell Esther George, though.

Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida spoke Friday in Boston, at a conference sponsored by the CFA Institute, and to nobody’s surprise, delivered a snoozer.

Clearly keen to avoid rocking any boats or upsetting any applecarts headed into the weekend, Clarida repeated that the domestic economy is in a “good place” but noted “evident risks”.

Those risks include slowing business investment and, of course, the manufacturing slump that’s manifested itself in two consecutive sub-50 ISM prints. Services are starting to “catch down”, as it were.

Clarida also highlighted the marked deceleration in the global economy. Disinflationary dynamics abroad “could cloud the outlook for US inflation”, he added.

That’s dovish, especially when you consider it in conjunction with the resilient dollar which, to the extent it refuses to roll over in earnest, effectively puts the Fed in a position of having to either cut rates aggressively or risk importing disinflation (more on that here and here).

(Deutsche Bank)

The dollar is, of course, on track for a third straight weekly loss, but long-term considerations around America’s “deplorable” (sorry) fiscal trajectory notwithstanding, there are still plenty of reasons to believe the greenback will remain some semblance of buoyant going forward.

Clarida was also quick to remind everyone that “organic” balance sheet growth (which began this week) is not QE. “It is important to note that the open market operations we have announced are technical, ‘Central Banking 101’ operations and should not be conflated with the large-scale asset purchase programs that the Federal Reserve deployed after the financial crisis”, he said.

Earlier Friday, the Wall Street Journal‘s Nick Timiraos was out with another one of his signature FOMC trial balloons.

“Federal Reserve officials are heading into their meeting in two weeks likely to cut interest rates while debating whether they have done enough for now to vaccinate the economy against growing risks of a sharper slowdown”, Timiraos wrote.

His Fed preview pieces are noteworthy only because they essentially serve as a window into whether the consensus at the Fed is in keeping with what the market has surmised from recent communications by officials. In other words, Nick likes to let everybody know whether or not the Fed agrees with market pricing for the next meeting (or two or three). October is a lock, December not so much.

Meanwhile, Esther George is sticking to her hawkish guns, come hell or high tariffs.

“My own outlook for the economy does not call for a monetary policy response”, she said Friday. “While weakness in manufacturing and business investment is evident, it is not clear that monetary policy is the appropriate tool to offset the risks faced by businesses in those sectors when weighted against the costs that could be associated with such action”.

God bless her.

Text of Clarida speech

Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this CFA Institute conference on fixed-income management. Before we begin our conversation, I would like to share a few thoughts about the outlook for the U.S. economy and monetary policy.

The U.S. economy is in a good place, and the baseline outlook is favorable. The median expectation from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) participants’ most recent Summary of Economic Projections is for GDP growth to be around 2 percent in 2019, for growth to continue near this pace next year, and for personal consumption expenditures (PCE) inflation to rise gradually to our symmetric 2 percent objective.2 The unemployment rate, at 3.5 percent, is at a half-century low, and wages are rising broadly in line with productivity growth and underlying inflation. There is no evidence to date that a strong labor market is putting excessive cost-push pressure on price inflation.

But despite this favorable baseline outlook, the U.S. economy confronts some evident risks in this the 11th year of economic expansion. Business fixed investment has slowed notably since last year, exports are contracting on a year-over-year basis, and indicators of manufacturing activity are weakening. Global growth estimates continue to be marked down, and global disinflationary pressures cloud the outlook for U.S. inflation.

U.S. inflation remains muted. Over the 12 months through August, PCE inflation is running at 1.4 percent, and core PCE inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is running at 1.8 percent.

Turning now to monetary policy, at both its July and September meetings, the FOMC voted to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points.3 With these decisions, the current target range for the federal funds rate is 1.75 to 2 percent, which compares with the range of 2.25 to 2.5 percent that prevailed between December 2018 and July 2019. The Committee took these actions to provide a somewhat more accommodative policy in response to muted inflation pressures and the risks to the outlook I mentioned earlier.

Looking ahead, monetary policy is not on a preset course, and the Committee will proceed on a meeting-by-meeting basis to assess the economic outlook as well as the risks to the outlook, and it will act as appropriate to sustain growth, a strong labor market, and a return of inflation to our symmetric 2 percent objective.

Turning now to the framework under which the Federal Reserve operates in financial markets, in September of this year, shocks in the repurchase agreement (repo) market put upward pressure on money market rates, and these pressures spilled over into the federal funds market. In response to these developments, the Federal Reserve on September 17 initiated a program of repurchase operations to provide liquidity sufficient to keep the federal funds rate within the desired target range. These operations have been successful in achieving this goal.

As the FOMC announced in January 2019, the Committee seeks to operate with a level of bank reserves that is sufficiently ample to ensure that control of the federal funds rate is achieved primarily by the setting of our administered rates and is not, over the longer term, reliant on frequent and large open market operations.4 In July, the FOMC concluded the program of balance sheet reduction in place since October 2017 and indicated then that, after a time, it would commence increasing its securities holdings to maintain reserves at a level consistent with an ample-reserves regime.

The FOMC announced on October 11 that it would seek to maintain, over time, a level of bank reserves at or somewhat above the level that prevailed in early September, a level that we believe is sufficient to operate an ample-reserves regime.5 This week, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began a program of purchasing Treasury bills in the secondary market. This program will continue at least into the second quarter of next year and is designed to achieve—and, over time, maintain—ample reserve balances at or above the level that prevailed in early September. In addition, the Federal Reserve will continue to conduct term and overnight repo operations at least through January to ensure that the supply of reserves remains ample even during periods of temporary, but pronounced, increases in our nonreserve liabilities, and to mitigate the risk that money market pressures adversely affect monetary policy implementation.

It is important to note that the open market operations we have announced are technical, “Central Banking 101” operations and should not be conflated with the large-scale asset purchase programs that the Federal Reserve deployed after the financial crisis. In those programs, the Federal Reserve was seeking to ease financial conditions by lowering term premiums via its purchases of long-term Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities. By contrast, the program announced on October 11 will concentrate its purchases in Treasury bills. The technical measures we are undertaking do not represent a change in the stance of monetary policy, which we continue to implement by adjusting the target range for the federal funds rate.

Finally, I would like to say a few words about the monetary policy framework review we are undertaking this year. This review of our monetary policy strategy, tools, and communications is the first of its kind for the Federal Reserve. Public engagement, unprecedented in scope for the Fed, is an important part of this effort. Through our Fed Listens events, we have been hearing a diverse range of perspectives not only from academic experts, but also from representatives of consumer, labor, business, community, and other groups. We will draw on these insights as we assess how best to achieve and maintain maximum employment and price stability in the most robust fashion possible. In July, we began discussing issues associated with the review at our FOMC meetings. We will continue reporting on our discussions in the meeting minutes and share our conclusions when we finish the review during the first half of next year.6

Thank you very much for your attention.


1. These remarks represent my own views, which do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Reserve Board or the Federal Open Market Committee. I am grateful to Brian Doyle of the Federal Reserve Board staff for his assistance in preparing this text. Return to text

2. The most recent Summary of Economic Projections is an addendum to the minutes of the September 2019 FOMC meeting. See Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2019), “Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee, September 17–18, 2019,” press release, October 9. Return to text

3. See Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2019), “Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement,” press release, July 31; and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2019), “Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement,” press release, September 18. Return to text

4. See the Statement Regarding Monetary Policy Implementation and Balance Sheet Normalization, which is available on the Board’s website. Return to text

5. See the Statement Regarding Monetary Policy Implementation, which can be found on the Board’s website. Return to text

6. Information about the review and the events associated with it are available on the Board’s websiteReturn to text

1 comment on “Vice Chair Clarida Delivers Friday Snoozer As Fed Looks To Coast Into October Rate Cut

  1. vicissitude

    Pondering interesting structure at the Fed:

    Committee on Financial Stability

    Chairman (vacant)
    Governor Brainard
    Vacant

    Old Forbes post, Dec 6, 2017 ==> “When Trump took office, the Board of Governors had two vacancies and five members: Janet Yellen, Stanley Fischer, Lael Brainard, Jerome Powell and Daniel Tarullo.

    Fischer and Tarullo both resigned this year. The Senate confirmed Randal Quarles as a board member and as vice-chair for supervision. So that leaves the membership at four as of now. (Randy put in place to destroy Dodd-Frank)

    Sometime in January or by February 3, the Board of Governors might drop to only three members: Powell, Brainard and Quarles. There’s an outside chance it could drop to two, since Quarles holds a partial term that ends January 31, 2018.”

    Update: Quarles took office as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on October 13, 2017, to fill an unexpired term ending on January 31, 2018. He was reappointed to the Board and sworn in on July 23, 2018, for a term ending January 31, 2032.

    Also see October 1, 2019 from reuters: “At times I have been in the middle of the committee. At times I have been on either end of the spectrum depending on the economic situation,” Bullard said last week following a Chamber of Commerce luncheon in Illinois. “I think I have demonstrated my credentials as far as calling my own shots.”

    ==> Anyone taking money from Chamber of Commerce is highly suspect and unworthy — not to metion the fact that Bullard is ranked as a crappy economist, lacking in experience — but he’s apparently available to take money from highly radical politicized institutions that are involved in such great efforts as:

    Citizens United

    Opposed the Affordable Health Care for America Act.[24] (Introduced 03/20/2017)[43]
    Opposed the Clean Power Plan.[44] (added new bullet point) (On March 28, 2017)[45]
    Opposes the DISCLOSE Act, which aims to limit foreign influence on U.S. elections.[49] (House – 06/27/2018)[50]
    Qualified opposition to financial regulation.[24

    etc ….

Speak On It

Skip to toolbar