Donald Trump is highly distressed at what he on Monday described as a “horrendous lack of vision by Jay Powell and the Fed”.
By “lack of vision”, the president of course means the good folks conducing US monetary policy don’t necessarily think it’s a great idea to cut rates to zero and restart large-scale asset purchases when the economy is growing at a 2.1% annualized clip and the unemployment rate is parked at a five-decade nadir.
The reason officials think that kind of overtly pro-cyclical policy lean might be dangerous is precisely because it is right out of the banana republic playbook, a characterization which becomes even more apt when you note that the country is run by a would-be strongman who recently deployed debt-funded fiscal stimulus in an effort to overheat the economy.
Read more: Trump Blasts Powell Fed For ‘Horrendous Lack Of Vision’, Demands Rate Cuts
Of course, Trump is doing everything he can to give the Fed some plausible deniability when it comes to cutting rates aggressively even as the domestic economic picture remains generally upbeat. Specifically, the president is doubling and tripling down on his trademark schizophrenia when it comes to trade policy and that, in turn, is creating unprecedented levels of uncertainty.
Just ask the June FOMC minutes (or just ask Beijing).
(Barclays)
For many on the Fed, that’s more than enough to justify a rate cut or two (or three), but Esther George and Eric Rosengren weren’t convinced in July, and for his part, Rosengren isn’t convinced now either.
“I just want to see evidence that we’re actually going into something that’s more of a slowdown”, the Boston Fed chief told Bloomberg’s Kathleen Hays on Monday, adding that “just because other countries are weak, if we’re strong it doesn’t mean we should [cut rates]”.
In other words, he’s going to dissent again in September.
If Powell is a man who suffers from “a horrendous lack of vision” in Trump’s estimation, then one can only imagine what the president thinks about Rosengren, who added insult to injury when he told Hays that “we have to be careful not to ease too much when we don’t have significant problems”.
Generally speaking, we would agree.
That said, the US does, arguably, have at least one “significant problem” and he’s been binge-tweeting about the Fed for nine months straight.
Acknowledging Uncertainty
10.07.16
” …we could improve the public’s understanding of our monetary policy strategy if we provided more interpretation of those facts – namely, our assessment of how recent changes in economic and financial data have or have not changed the medium-run outlook, the risks around that outlook, and therefore the appropriate policy path. We could also strive for more consistency about the conditions we systematically assess in calibrating the stance of policy so that the public would get a better sense of the Committee’s reaction function over time.”
https://www.clevelandfed.org/en/newsroom-and-events/speeches/sp-20161007-acknowledging-uncertainty
2.1% growth rate. Zero earnings growth y/y. Trump’s econ miracle!!!