Already have an account? log in
This article is FREE for you
Create a free account and join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks
By submitting your email address you agree to receive communication by email
Trader: Things Have Changed And Here’s Where The World Is Going Next…
By Kevin Muir of “The Macro Tourist” fame; reposted here with permission
Today’s post is su
OR, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree to receive communication by email
By submitting your email address you agree to receive communication by email
So where would that lead? Smaller CB balance sheets & more bureaucrats & entitlements. Bigger Govt which is unbelievably inefficient. Which is a waste of resources. It’s all soooo unfortunate
Economic dynamics does not posses the homogeneity implicit in the aforementioned thesis. Imagine a globe with all debtor nations. Ya. Now imagine a trajectory trying to get there. See?
I suppose it becomes a race. Raise rates first or get left in the dust, the first to start get the more valuable currencies and therefore the more desirable debt instruments. You get one big game of musical chairs. The music stopped… everybody try to get a seat.
Would be very interested to see an overlay of GDP on your chart of annualized federal spending growth. The other bar chart that would interest me in this graph would be timing and extent of other (including personal) tax cut enactments, given the current 70% GDP dependent on consumer spending. In an ideal world, wage growth effect would also be interesting, but this may have less meaningful correlation since increasing market financialization and buybacks have blunted what historically would have contributed to positive GDP and wage growth relationship. Thanks.
https://www.hudson.org/research/12714-economic-growth-by-president
reagan 81-88 3.5%
bush 89-92 2.3%
clinton 93-00 3.9% these are all real gdp looks like GOP spend at twice the rate, yet results are mixed
w bush 01-08 2.1%
obama 1.5%