How Bad Was Trump’s Fox & Friends Meltdown From A Legal Perspective? Here’s A Lawsplainer

By Five Dollar Feminist as originally published over at Wonkette and reposted here with permission THESE PEOPLE ARE ALL FUCKING CRAZY! Not to get technical, but what the hell is going on here? Normal human beings do not go on television and rant about their ongoing legal problems. In the span of 20 excruciating minutes, Trump admitted: That Cohen had represented him in the Stormy Daniels payoff – a fact he’d previously claimed no knowledge of; That he knew about the payoff, but th

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today

View subscription options

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

One thought on “How Bad Was Trump’s Fox & Friends Meltdown From A Legal Perspective? Here’s A Lawsplainer

  1. “That Cohen’s legal representation of him was minimal, meaning very little of what was seized in the FBI raid of Cohen’s office can be privileged; and, just for good measure,”

    Cohen, as the lawyer for someone who’s been involved in over 1300 lawsuits, may be involved with a very small portion of his clients legal needs, but that very little may very well account for a large portion of his work/document hoard (aside from his “business” documents, of course.)

    I’d like to see Trump indicted just as much as the next sane person……, so am I missing something here or is there a gaping hole in logical reasoning here?

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints