USA Today: ‘Trump Isn’t Fit To Clean Obama’s Toilets’

And the fallout continues from this tweet: That's the President of the United States suggesting that a sitting Senator trades sexual favors for campaign contributions. As we detailed on Tuesday, this is a new low for Trump. Furious at Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand's decision to join Cory Booker of New Jersey and Jeff Merkley of Oregon (Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon later jumped on board) in calling for the President to resign in the wake of a public press conference by women who have accuse

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 thoughts on “USA Today: ‘Trump Isn’t Fit To Clean Obama’s Toilets’

  1. Some of the problems that Trump addresses are real problems. It’s his solutions that are like him – simple minded, grossly flawed, moronic and obviously dysfunctional.

    I could detail some of Trump and Republican talking points that are significant problems for the US at large that need to be addressed with comprehensive, efficient and legal solutions (not going to happen with the current Republican leadership crop). However, in this current case of Trump siding with Moore and Moore’s subsequent narrow loss – I have to honor one of my previous commitments to the rest of humanity. That commitment being – that if I ever saw Trump on fire and burning brightly as he is now, I wouldn’t take the time or effort – to piss on him with the intent to dampen or put that fire out.

    1. LOL!! and I applaud your commitment to your duty! thanks Dugger 🙂

      and Pete – I predict his disrespect and public comments picking on the girls will be his downfall! 🙂

      and Marty – I concur with Curt, Amen brother! 🙂

      1. Did anyone see the Oversight Committee hearing today with Rod Rosenstien? Where most of the Republican knuckleheads in their effort to Obstruct Justice with Hannity, Fox News, Wall Street Journal and other Republicans by causing Mueller to be fired, made the case that, because Mueller’s prosecutors made contributions to Clinton and others they should be disqualified for having conflicts?

        Here’s Democrat Ted Lieu questioning Rosenstien in his effort to demonstrate the stupidity of the argument:

        https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4698976/rep-ted-lieu-dag-rod-rosenstein-political-bias-doj

        The flip side of course, and the irony, is that if Republicans are correct, the entire hierarchy of the AG’s office and the FBI should be disqualified for having conflicts if they sought to investigate Clinton!

        1. Mr. Lieu did a calm and orderly and logical job — basically showing these men were appointed by repub presidents and these men have high standards of honesty and reliability and these men made sizeable donations to campaign candidates, which they have a right to make. Problem is Hannity and his disgusting comrades want to protect the man who even they must know is a cheat and a liar so they are willing to lower themselves to barely human and do everything they can to try and twist and tweak facts in order to try their best to demean or destroy those same men who have established records of decency and moral standards unlike the creep they are trying to protect.

          My question is why would they do that? Are they that gullible or stupid to think that the rest of the U.S. population is wrong – about 73% or more – and their maybe quarter percent knows best? How about the hard evidence that proves their guy is a liar or a cheat or a failure? And furthermore, how do people like Hannity find employment in front of cameras with a worldwide reach, spew their garbage and stay on the air? What is wrong in our country that we cannot get rid of that kind of trash?

          Broadcast Standards and Practices which is responsible for the moral, ethical, and legal implications of the program that networks air should pay more attention to this trash instead of who wins how much money of some dumb game show!

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_Standards_and_Practices

          1. Murphy: “My question is why would they do that?”

            To obstruct the investigation and protect Trump and co-conspirators from further investigation and prosecution for crimes he and they engaged in.

            Putin is a neo-communist. Trump is obviously a neo-communist supporter and may be one himself. Many Republican congressmen appear to have zero problem with Trump’s affinity for neo-communism so I infer that some or many of them, according to their conduct, are neo-communist supporters or are neo-communist themselves that have infiltrated congress.

            Perhaps there needs to be a Special Counsel appointed to investigate Congress and the Executive branch for such infiltration? Of course, we should make sure they have contributed to both parties, and only the Republican party.

          2. Well, Marty, my fault for asking a rhetorical question with a lawyer hanging around! 🙂 You know I know they did that to throw fuel on a fire to make people go apeshit and create havoc and hopefully arouse a demand for Mueller to be removed and shut down the investigation — as I said as a follow up to that question – do they think we are that gullible or stupid — wanna take a shot at answering that question? hahaha! I doubt at this late date they will get more idiots to join his base, in fact seems like a few have abandoned that base.

            Regarding your neo-communist comments – agree with you on that. But I don’t think trump is smart enough to understand he has communist ideals. He is more the King type. Those morons that follow him and kiss his ass and support him so they can keep their cushy little jobs, easy money — some of them chase a few women and then have the audacity to pay them off, $84,000 to one, from taxpayer funds! And get away with it until we find out make a stink about it. Some of the smarter ones do realize trump is a dangerous man to “lead” this Nation but want to don’t rock the boat for a variety of reasons.

            So, how about you take a shot at my other question about how to get rid of the trash like Hannity, maybe via the Networks or Standards and Practices. Any ideas along those lines? I would sign a petition to have a Special Counsel investigate Congress and Executive members – we would restock under new rules and guidelines too!

          3. “What is wrong in our country that we cannot get rid of that kind of trash”
            Just find out the name of the guy he’s schtupping and your problems are over.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints