‘Nightmare Scenario’: 2.1 Million Dead If North Korea Conducts Nuclear Strike On Seoul, Tokyo

Last weekend, Donald Trump racked up a truly “impressive” tally of egregious tweets – even by Trump-ian standards.

And while the 140-character insults he hurled at Puerto Rico grabbed most of the headlines, it was the following one-two tweet-punch that was perhaps the most disconcerting:

North

For one thing, he’s “crafting” (if you want to call it that) America’s foreign policy on the fly and disseminating it with no filter and without any vetting on social media. And on top of that, he’s undermining his Secretary of State in front of the entire world.

 

That combination (eschewing protocol and undercutting the nation’s top diplomat) would be outlandish enough on its own, but when you throw in the fact that he’s talking about nuclear war, those tweets represent a dereliction of duty “the likes of which the world has never seen” (to use a Trump’s own words against him).

He is putting millions of people’s lives at risk simply because he felt slighted by Tillerson’s admission that that the U.S. is (or at least “was”) in direct communication with the regime in Pyongyang. Calling it “cavalier” is to woefully understate the case. Calling it “irresponsible” isn’t even close to adequate. “Insane” is a better fit.

Since then, other U.S. officials have attempted to walk back Trump’s Sunday nuclear Mad Libs, but that’s small comfort to a world that’s running low on adequate descriptors to express the sheer magnitude of its collective incredulity.

Well, in the face of this, Michael J. Zagurek Jr., a consultant specializing in databases and computer modeling, decided to outline the worst case scenario for Seoul and Tokyo in the event Trump pushes this thing over the proverbial cliff. That analysis can be found below…

By Michael J. Zagurek Jr. for 38north.org

At various times over the past few weeks, US President Donald Trump and other members of his administration have threatened to use military force to prevent North Korea from conducting additional nuclear or ballistic missile tests. The US carrying out any military option raises a significant risk of military escalation by the North, including the use of nuclear weapons against South Korea and Japan. According to the calculations presented below, if the “unthinkable” happened, nuclear detonations over Seoul and Tokyo with North Korea’s current estimated weapon yields could result in as many as 2.1 million fatalities and 7.7 million injuries.

Background

Since 2011, North Korea has conducted 98 ballistic missile tests, which have resulted in more capable missiles, larger payloads, longer ranges and presumably increased reliability. During the same period, they conducted four underground nuclear weapons tests [2] [3], the most recent on September 3. On July 4 and July 28, 2017, North Korea tested for the first time, an intercontinental-range ballistic missile (ICBM), capable of reaching most of the USA [4]. Expert analysis suggests that the North has the capability to arm ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads and has a baseline nuclear arsenal estimated at around 20 to 25 nuclear warheads with yields in the 15-25 kiloton range [5]. The September 3 nuclear test was likely a thermonuclear device with estimated yields between 108 and 250 kilotons [3], suggesting that North Korea’s nuclear arsenal could eventually be upgraded to consist of larger yield thermonuclear weapons.

The goal of the North Korean regime seems to be ensuring the continuation of the Kim family rule by having a viable nuclear deterrent capability against the United States [6]. However, North Korea’s continued missile development and nuclear capabilities are perceived as “provocative and destabilizing” and posing a significant security threat to US allies–South Korea and Japan–US assets in the Asian theatre and the US homeland [6]. Multiple sanctions imposed on North Korea by the United Nations, the United States, South Korea, Japan, and the European Union have not deterred the North from further WMD development [7], despite growing condemnation from the international community. Even China, traditionally North Korea’s staunchest ally and primary trading partner, has criticized North Korea’s continuing nuclear weapon and missile development programs, reduced some trade with North Korea, and has made it clear that if a conflict should break out on the Korean Peninsula that North Korea is “on its own.” [8]

In addition, the United States and its allies, in response to North Korea’s missile deployments and continued testing, have looked to bolster their defenses. The Terminal High Altitude Air Defense (THAAD) system has been deployed in South Korea [9]. Japan has selected the Aegis Ashore ABM system [10]. The United States has also tested the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) anti-ballistic missile system (ABM) against an ICBM package and is increasing the number of GMDs deployed to 44 by the end of 2017 [11].

If the status quo is unacceptable and diplomacy has been ineffective, then at what point do military responses become probable?  The tension between North Korea, its neighbors and the United States are now extremely high, antagonized further by bombastic exchanges between the US and DPRK during the United Nations General Assembly meetings and continued tweets from Trump. History is replete with “rational actors” grossly miscalculating, especially in crisis situations. It is possible that another North Korean nuclear test–especially if detonated in air or under water–an ICBM test, or a missile test that has the payload impact area too close to US bases in Guam for example, might see Washington react with force. This could include such options as attempting to shoot down the test missiles or possibly attacking North Korea’s missile testing, nuclear related sites, missile deployment areas or the Kim Regime itself. The North Korean leadership might perceive such an attack as an effort to remove the Kim family from power and, as a result, could retaliate with nuclear weapons as a last gasp reaction before annihilation. Therefore, it is worth reviewing the consequences if the “unthinkable” happened.

A Hypothetical Attack

Let us assume that North Korea has 25 operational nuclear weapons and that when under attack, it decides to launch its entire arsenal against both Seoul and Tokyo. The warhead yield ranges from 15 to 250 kilotons (current and possible future capabilities) and are timed for airburst at optimal altitude. Based on these assumptions, seven scenarios were run, one for each of the seven different warhead yields.

There are dozens of variables in calculating the potential effects of nuclear detonations on population centers. One can run countless simulations with many combinations of these variables with a wide range of results [12]. For simplification purposes, the calculations in this simulation are based on traditional population vulnerability due to blast overpressure [13]. The blast areas for the seven weapon yields were calculated using the Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer [14].

Current estimated population, area, and population density for Seoul and Tokyo [15]:

N1

The population density at the center of both Seoul and Tokyo is significantly higher. For example, the population density of Seoul Special City is 17,002/km2 [16], the population density of Tokyo’s Special Wards is 14,950/km[17]. Moreover, the population density levels of these special areas can significantly increase during the work week.

Casualty Estimates

Based on these assumptions, the number of casualties expected from a single reliable 250 kt warhead airburst over the centers of Seoul and Tokyo is as follows [18]:

N2

The following maps show the various blast overpressure areas from the 250 kt detonations.

Seoul showing the four blast areas from a 250 kt airbust detonation — 12+ psi, 5-12 psi, 2-5 psi, 1-2 psi.

N3

Tokyo showing the four blast areas from a 250 kt airburst detonation — 12+ psi, 5-12 psi, 2-5 psi, 1-2 psi.

N4

Naturally, no missile system is 100 percent reliable. The US Minuteman III ICBM, the most tested missile in its arsenal, is listed as having a test reliability of nearly 100 percent [19]. However, as with all weapon systems, its operational reliability is probably less. Moreover, South Korea has deployed one THAAD battery to help protect against a North Korean missile attack and Japan is in the process of acquiring the Aegis Ashore ABM system. Therefore, not all 25 North Korean nuclear missile warheads will detonate on their targets. Three levels of probability of detonation were used in calculating casualties: 20, 50 and 80 percent.

The following graphs show the results of these calculations. These casualty numbers are estimates based on narrow assumptions.

N5

N6

N7

During the 1950-1953 Korean War, South Korea’s civilian casualties were probably on the order of 373,599 fatalities and 229,625 injured, with 387,744 abducted or missing [21]. Japan is believed to have suffered 500,000-800,000 civilian deaths during World War II [22]. The population densities for both Seoul and Tokyo are far higher today than they were during the 1940s and 1950s. Multiple nuclear weapon detonations on both Seoul and Tokyo based on the current North Korea yield estimates could result in anywhere from 400,000 to 2 million deaths. With possible thermonuclear yields with the same number of weapons, the number of deaths could range between 1.3 and 3.8 million.

Full references list in original

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 thoughts on “‘Nightmare Scenario’: 2.1 Million Dead If North Korea Conducts Nuclear Strike On Seoul, Tokyo

  1. Please keep stoking the fire!!
    H have you just stopped for one minute to consider that you and your ilk are as much the problem?
    Well of course you have!
    As you are well aware that kind of stuff just doesn’t sell.
    When you eventually get to the other side( in a box)
    It will be fun to here you explain!
    But this won’t happen until you personally are in the fox hole!

  2. That’s right Walt!!

    You’re stoking the fire by pointing out that by Trump, either inadvertently or advertently, could easily provoke Kim into preemptively attacking and causing countless deaths to innocent allies!!

    Yes, Walter Heisenberg you should be ashamed!!

    By posting Carter’s article which seeks to bring the parties together in an effort to achieve a peaceful resolution instead of using over the top empty threats, name calling and the use of bullying military exercises which obviously rang hollow by prompting Kim to send two missiles over Japanese territory, Everybody on Trump’s side of things calls Kim crazy. Well then, let’s assume our fearless leader and his followers are correct: Kim is crazy. Who in their right mind taunts and belittles a crazy man known to starve millions of his own people, who killed his own uncle, who had done much worse and possesses deliverable nuclear weapons?

    Well, of course, a fucking moron.

    1. Time to bring a dose of reality to the conversation..First..Trump is correct in his approach to Jong-Un
      ..he has him guessing and thinking. If that’s being on “Trump’s side” on this point..so what? In fact, it is the other side who are consistently calling Jong-Un crazy and out of control. Ring a bell?

      The United States has played the Diplomatic Chump for 30 years….and in that time a destitute, isolated and technologically illiterate nation has managed to develop to a finished product a nuclear arsenal with a variety of throw weights and target capacities. Every attempt at civilized conversation and Western rational negotiation has been shown to be ineffective..as ineffective as the worst President since Woodrow Wilson..the incredibly hapless Jimmy Carter.

      Carter proposed we actually sit down with a nation that demands a multitude of concessions and proposed that No. Korea offer what??? Jimmy says..a smile and a handshake does it for me!

      Part of the hysteria surrounding this issue is the ridiculous notion that No. Korea will “nuke” Seoul and 2 million will die. They are not nuking the US..Seoul..or anyone else…That is precisely what I mean when I sati is the anti Trump fixated who believe Kimbo is a loony..he is NOT…

      Jong-Un is clever and calculating…he knows..that any nuclear strike undoes his regime and what he eventually wants..a very high profit exportable..packaged..nuclear arsenal to go! This entire bogus narrative is being used to discredit a very fragile and difficult man..Trump. A man who never should have been elected..and also the only President we have had who might settle this issue..

      By the by..the only solution to the No. Korea “conundrum” is to eliminate Kimbo…China will assist readily if we make the correct case in the correct way. What’s it worth to the perpetual miners to really end this? Jimmy Carter was a joke as President..he is more than a joke now.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints