It’s another of those days. The S&P 500 closed the week at an all time high, and although you would think everyone would be feeling good about it, the rally has brought about more angst than pleasure.
Turning on your twitter feed this morning, you face a deluge of scary charts about debt burdens and historical P/E comparisons that remind you of all the risks in the markets. Your timeline is filled with sarcastic comments about how “this will end well” and witty remarks about clueless CNBC guests. You take refuge in the fact that you are part of the elite crew who “gets it.” After all, this group has some pretty illustrious company. Mark Yusko from Morgan Creek Management was recently quoted as saying, “I’m telling you right now, the U.S. is going to have a massive crash.” Carl Icahn has even produced a video titled “Danger Ahead” where he lays out the bear case, and why you should put on all the same trades that worked in 2008 because, not only is another great financial crisis coming, but this time it will be even worse. There seems to be a direct correlation with how “smart” you are, and your level of bearishness.
Now maybe these gurus will prove correct. Maybe we are about to crash and this article will age poorly. I am willing to accept that possibility. After all, I get stuff wrong all the time.
But I want to take a moment to point out that so does everyone, including all these “smart” hedge fund managers. I love listening to Kyle Bass. His arguments are well thought out, original and entertaining. Yet I bet many of you have forgotten about his 2011 trade where he bought 20 million nickels because the melt value was 6.8 cents.
Yes, Kyle knew melting coins is illegal, but when you could buy an asset at a 36% discount, with a hard put at your cost (after all, a nickel will always be worth a nickel), it was effectively a free option. Not only that, but I think at that time Kyle was a big hard asset bull, so it offered a unique risk reward.
A five cent coin is made of 75% copper and 25% nickel. To get a better sense of Kyle’s trade, I made up a melt-down index that charts the intrinsic value of that nickel.
No wonder we don’t hear about this trade anymore. The intrinsic value of that nickel has declined 60% since Bass told the world about this opportunity.
I understand Bass didn’t lose any money from this trade, and if anything, this is the true genius of many of these hedge fund managers – they find ways to bet where they lose little if they are wrong, but make tons if they are right. But the other day, I did see Bass in an Austin Starbucks, and he was paying for his double foam latte with a pocketful of nickels (I hear he has already been banned from the city office for trying to pay for his parking tickets in change).
My point is that we all get it wrong, including Bass, Yusko, Icahn and [insert whatever guru you want in here].
So when you take solace in the fact the stock market is running higher without you, I would be weary of consoling yourself that you are in smart company.
Now please don’t mistake my unwillingness to join the chorus of those warning about the dangers ahead as my belief that everything is rosy. I understand the arguments about the huge imbalances in the financial system. I don’t need a lecture about the unsustainability of the current environment. I get it, we are screwed. We have made too many promises, have not saved enough and have created a can’t win financial situation.
Yet why is everyone so sure it will end in a deflationary bust? I hear all these gurus talking about the optionality of cash. Yeah, I understand. If you hold cash when prices collapse, you are able to buy when everyone else is selling. You listen to these hedge fund managers tell the story, and it sounds so compelling. It makes you want to sell everything, sit back and wait for the inevitable collapse.
But here’s another way of looking at cash. A dollar from 1913 is now worth less than a nickel.
And that’s using the government’s official CPI data! Imagine if you used the correct level of inflation…
So I ask you, with Central Bankers determined to create inflation, why on earth would you want to hold cash? For this trade to work, you have to assume Central Bankers will suddenly change their tune and be willing to preserve the purchasing power of money.
I don’t see any signs of Central Banks becoming more responsible. In fact, the math makes it virtually impossible for them to ever normalize rates. Do you know the economic slowdown that would happen with proper interest rates? It would be devastating. It would make the 1929 depression look like a walk in the park.
Central Bankers are becoming less responsible, not the other way round. I started following this interesting organic chemistry professor from Cornell that is a self professed Libertarian. Dave Collum had this terrific tweet that summed up the current situation perfectly:
Dave is correct that the free market wants deflation. There is too much debt in the system, and the market is trying to reset through a credit destruction event. The 2008 great financial crisis was the result of the private sector trying to pay down credit. It was stopped when governments and Central Banks stepped in to replace the private sector, but it was a difficult, scary process. Officials underestimated how much credit expansion was needed, so the bounce ended up being choppy and prone to stops and starts.
But as Central Bankers have become more comfortable with balance sheet expansion, they have increased the rate of increase. Have a look at the chart above. The rate of expansion has been increasing, not the other way round.
Does this look like the chart where Central Bankers are about to reverse the constant inflating?
Central Bankers, through their actions of financial repression, have told you that they don’t respect the value of your savings. Why on earth would you want to hold the asset they have constantly debased?
I don’t think stocks, real estate or any other financial asset offers value at these lofty prices. Yet I believe the asset in which all these other securities are priced in, is an even worse investment.
Which brings me back to today’s stock market. On Friday, the Non-Farm Payrolls missed. The US macro data has disappointed versus expectations for the past couple of months, and this has finally bled into the employment number.
Although Central Bankers are inflating, they are not doing it uniformly. In the period after the 2008 credit crisis, the Federal Reserve was the most aggressive Central Bank out there, causing many distortions in the financial markets. The ECB was reluctant to join the party, and their stinginess resulted in their own 2011 European crisis. Eventually, Draghi & Co. had to turn on the liquidity taps. The Bank of Japan is on their own timeline, kicked off with the Fukushima nuclear disaster. It’s not as simple as saying all Central Bankers are printing without abandon. They have taken turns, sometimes one country doing more, while the others sit it out.
And right now, the Federal Reserve is the one on the sideline. In fact, the Fed is trying to normalize interest rates, and even more boldly, setting up plans to shrink their balance sheet.
I think it was Jim Bianco who said there has never been a modern day Central Bank that has successfully shrunk their balance sheet, so the Fed’s ambitious plans should prove interesting.
If you believe the Fed will stay the course with higher rates and a lower balance sheet in the face of economic weakness, then, by all means, short U.S. equities. If you think the last century of dollar debasement will reverse and the Federal Reserve will become a saver’s friend instead of their enemy, then stock up on a big slug of cash.
I don’t believe for a second the Federal Reserve will stick to their plan to normalize the balance sheet and raise rates when the economy slows down. In fact, I think markets will be shocked at how quickly the Fed changes their tune. They don’t really have a choice, the massive debts need to be serviced, and force feeding the economy cheap credit is the only way to keep the economy moving forward.
This viscous cycle of a slow down being met with ever easier Central Bank policies will only be stopped when we enter into an inflationary bust. It’s only when the bond market does what Bill Fleckenstein has warned about, and finally takes away the keys, will governments be forced to deal with the massive imbalances in the financial system.
So when Friday’s employment number disappointed, it was met with all sorts of glee from the stock market bears. I don’t view it the same way. Of course, a slowing economy will often be met with equity selling and bond buying, but this isn’t a regular market.
What is the biggest risk to financial markets? Contrary to popular opinion, it’s not a slowing economy. No, it’s the withdrawal of Central Bank stimulus. Right now the Fed is tightening, probably a little too quickly given the huge amount of debt. A slowing economy will change the pace of this tightening, and eventually even cause easing. Therefore, ironically, an economic slowdown is stock market bullish.
I am not scared of a slowing economy because I know Central Bankers will be there with a big fistful of blue tickets. I am scared of inflation finally spurting up and having the Central Bankers withdraw liquidity too quickly.
It seems crazy to rely on these Central Bank knobs as a backstop as you buy assets. But that’s the problem. It is irresponsible to be invested at these levels based on a Central Bank put. And that’s why everyone is under-invested. Could you really go in front a pension board and suggest an overweighting in equities because Central Bankers have your back? Not a chance. Or if you are a retail investor, with nightmares of the 2008 crisis still swirling through your mind, do you really want to expose yourself to that sort of drawdown? When you combine those worries with the fact that you haven’t saved enough, add in the fact you are probably going to live longer than any other generation, you simply don’t want to lose it again. It’s no wonder less US adults are invested in the stock market than any period in the past twenty years.
And if you manage a hedge fund, you remember the fortunes made during the pricking of the last bubble. Hedge fund managers who were previously nobodies, became household names. Everyone wants to replicate that success. Everywhere you look there are managers with calls about the next “big short.”
On Wall Street everyone hedges for the last crisis. I don’t know much, but I do know that the next crisis will look nothing like the previous one.
Owning the asset Central Bankers seem most intent on debasing is perverse logic. If you really think government and Central Bankers are out of control, shouldn’t you be shorting them? And how do you do that? Well, I would argue shorting bonds is a much better trade than betting against stocks. After all, that’s where the real bubble is.
This has turned into a long diatribe, but my main point is that I am not surprised that stocks went higher Friday in the face of bad economic news. A slowing economy will not end this period of overvaluation. It will only end when the bond market finally pukes. Until then, the Central Bank bubble will just continue to get more and more expensive.
Most market participants believe it will end in a deflationary bust, and therefore hiding in long dated risk free fixed income is the best bet. Well, at the risk of being on the other side of the trade of most “smarter” hedge fund managers, I say, sold to them. There will be rallies in bonds that you can trade, but over the long run, I have complete faith that governments and Central Banks will do what they do best – inflate away your hard earned money. Betting against them is betting against history…