Advertisements
populism Trump

Behold: A Sad, Sad Spectacle

That, right there, is why this is all so f*cking sad.

A week ago, in “‘They’re Stealing Our Jobs!’: Populism And False Prophets,” I said the following:

What [politicians like Trump] are doing is grabbing power for themselves and taking advantage of “the people” who, thanks to a number of factors, are vulnerable to manipulation.

On Saturday evening, I followed up on the post linked above.

In “Thinking Globally In A World Gone Mad” I offered this:

What I despise most about this entire populist spectacle is that Trump is exploiting people’s ignorance. Marine Le Pen is doing the same thing in France. Frauke Petry is doing the same thing in Germany. I’m not really sure if Geert Wilders is doing the same thing in the Netherlands because frankly, Wilders is so goddamn crazy that I dare say he actually believes everything he says – so in a way, he’s actually preferable to the false populist prophets in the US, France, and Germany who are merely seeking to capitalize politically on popular discontent.

As strange, paternalistic, and pretentious as this sounds, I’m not trying to be derisive by characterizing Trump’s support base as “gullible idiots.” I mean, a large percentage of them are gullible idiots, but that’s exactly why this situation is so sad. Trump cannot bring back American manufacturing. He cannot wind the clock back and restore industries that are simply no longer competitive in a modern, global economy. To tell people that he can is cruel. It gives people false hope. And it also ensures that they’ll never be able to adapt to the new reality in which they live.

Consider those excerpts, and then watch the following clip from Trump’s Saturday night campaign-style rally in Florida.

That’s precisely what I’m talking about.

That, right there, is why this is all so f*cking sad.

Advertisements

2 comments on “Behold: A Sad, Sad Spectacle

  1. larrysites

    Here and in your post “Thinking Globally In A World Gone Mad” you seem to agree with Thomas Friedman’s world view of an unproven belief that:

    “It is unquestionably desirable (again, from a utilitarian perspective) to create an open, global economy and to foster a shared human destiny. ”
    Martin Sheff in his book “That should still be us: How Thomas Friedman’s flat world myths are keeping us flat on our backs” both questions such elitist thinking and shows convincingly that it is NOT desirable. That is unless you are a part of the elitist minority that profit the most from the global shifting of the labor force. I am reminded of the priests of unproven religious beliefs that blame the masses for the failures of their gods ie, they just don’t believe strongly enough or are unwilling to make the personal sacrifices necessary for the greater good.

    I don’t personally care for Trump, I voted libertarian rather than the lesser of two evils, but to say that it is sad to see so many people hope for him to succeed seems like the fake tears of the priests when their false beliefs are questioned by the masses.

    • Trump is the priest in your analogy. Don’t forget the next big rally with his followers is being held in Mar-a-Lago on April 1.

Speak On It

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar