Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
Where’s The ‘Trump Put’?!
"Nouveau bulls" are nervous and the S&P's one meaningful weekly loss away from creating the only
That’s to me one of the more interesting questions currently: whether Trump would try to “save” the stock market (at least pre-inflation) if it starts falling, e.g. by kicking Powell. Arguments for it are straightforward; his affinity for the Dow as a highscore is well known. Against is that he’s better off financially this term compared to 2016, and might consign to the far right idea that first everything must burn until it can be rebuilt. And if he for a change will be acting rationally in this matter he will simply ignore it.
Trump won’t like seeing his money burn.
I agree that his much-improved financial position since 2016 might have dimmed his obsession with the Dow. I think he might be much more interested in the price of gold this time around (btw — Stephanie Kelton recently speculated as to why which I found convincing), then Bitcoin (oops).
The best Trump put, however, might be if he goes on an around-the-world golf trip for a month or two and refrains from speaking to the press. Sadly, the bid-ask spread on that option is bigly to the point of untradeable.
Folks Trump isn’t that sharp. He is a con man who has figured out how to rule the idiocracy and leverage that to his benefit. Everything else is a random walk. We need luck and a lot of it to manage the next 4 years.
Why do so many still cling to the notion that Trump still is obsessed with the stock market? That’s so last term!
In fact, when he was first announcing tariffs on Mexico and Canada he explicitly stated that he did not care about the market’s poor reaction
This is yet another example of many investors ignoring what Trump says if it does not fit into their bullish narrative. Hope springs eternal.
The crowd that justifies billionaires keeping more of their wealth either argues out of ignorance or bad faith. All the arguments about work ethic, creating jobs, free markets, etc. ignore the simple fact that the government and Fed are the entities that underpin all of that wealth. Going back to the Great Recession (you can certainly find earlier examples, but it wasn’t quite so explicit), every potential incident that could have triggered a financial meltdown was effectively averted due to government and Fed intervention.
The ability of capital and entrepreneurs to take the kind of risks that created our most successful companies only exists because we give capital a massive government safety net. Instead of recognizing that and taxing capital appropriately, Republicans want to cut taxes even more for billionaires and further entrench rent-seeking in our society. Too bad that Joe MAGA doesn’t understand how welfare for the rich works and that free markets are a fairy tale except for poor people.