Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
Bonds Need The Deets
Stocks may have a bond problem.
Let's take a quick step back. On the eve of the Fed's September meeting, 10s were 3.63%. 75bps of rate cuts, one election and two months later, they're 4.43%.
Is that a "harrowing" selloff? Not really, no. But it's meaningful and equities struggled with it a bit last week.
The figure below, updated with the latest estimates from the NY Fed's model, is a reminder that behind the October 2024 "Trump trade" in Treasurys was a re-run of the late-summer/early-autumn
echos … primarily a bond guy, I’ve not jumped in post election w/ higher rates (sporadic munis only) – even way smarter people than me (as your post highlights) can’t find a clear bead to follow – we’re in the dark, and bond people do not like darkness, … our shadows can bother us … in my experience.
I suspect the stimulative effects will be less than folks imagine. Tariffs are a consumption tax for one thing, and extending the 2017 cuts is only keeping in place what’s already there. If spending growth slows because of discretionary cutbacks vs cutting corporate taxes and top rates I think you are looking at a wash. The big change will be income distribution. Surprise! Trump’s voters are going to get a punch in the face.
We got that last time. The cap on S&L tax deductions cost me 10k. My taxes went up 2 pp under Trump 1.0.
I’m willing to bet the tight margin in the house results in the SALT limits being repealed or increased. A lot of reps in NY and CA that want to see that removed, but that’ll be a big tax cut for me as well if that gets repealed. Then again, Republicans are more than happy to inflict maximum punishment on blue states and that’s one of the most effective ways to do it.