Kamala Harris Needs To Change The Economic Narrative

"Even though consumers remain relatively positive about the labor market, they still appear to be concerned about elevated prices and interest rates." So said Conference Board chief economist Dana Peterson on Tuesday, editorializing around a so-so update on US consumer moods. Peterson probably didn't mean to say anything profound -- and really she didn't -- but that short quote encapsulates the problem for Democrats headed into the election. Joe Biden's approval rating was famously disconnect

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today

View subscription options

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 thoughts on “Kamala Harris Needs To Change The Economic Narrative

  1. Haven’t the bulk of job creation since COVID been low wage low skill jobs? I recall reading research showing that high paying high quality jobs are still below pre-COVID levels. Not really a win there. Kamala is a horrible candidate and it’s pretty amazing how she was essentially coronated within 48h after Biden dropped out. She’s trying to move away from her far-left rhetoric for the election but is still heavily playing into identify politics (“Black Women for Kamala”, “White Dudes for Harris” – how fast would that be labeled as a white supremacist gathering if done on the right?) and won’t speak out forcefully against the pro-Terrorist wing of the Democratic Party. Her record as vice president is awful and the border crisis she was tasked with was an absolute disaster. No amount of media denial and pack peddling will change that and I suspect a reckoning is coming when the honeymoon phase is over. She hasn’t had a single significant address since Biden dropped but it’s non-stop media fluff and BS. I can’t believe I’m saying this and it pains me to say but Trump is the actual moderate in this race. He might be a fkn moron but when he floats names like Jamie Dimon as Treasury Secretary, I think it’s more likely he will appoint the right people to govern. We are witnessing the ultimate gaslighting for this mediocre woman with a bad record that starts with her sleeping her way up the local political theatre in SF.

    1. Some points here that are hard to refute. The media is trying to project her as a pop culture celebrity which doesn’t resonate with serious people. I definitely think agree with Mr. H that she needs to talk seriously about the economy …..but in all her roles before she has never had to talk seriously about the economy. Once her honeymoon period ends…..does that open the possibility, of an open convention ??

      1. This, to me, is one of the more sensible comments here. It was astounding how quickly everybody forgot that she was polling behind every single other possible replacement for Biden, and for good reason. I have never seen someone’s public image be rehabbed so fast and so completely, without anything about them actually having changed.

        At the same time, I’m not gonna deny that the most important thing is that Trump not be reelected, but, I have never believed, and this goes back decades, that the best thing for this country is to consistently elect someone whose primary qualification is that they’re only second worst. Although now she looks especially good because not only is she only second worst, but, she also doesn’t have early stage dementia. Spectacular qualifications for office there. I can see the reasons for enthusiasm.

        It’s a tough time though, because you also don’t wanna be read as thinking that Breitbart-style dont-think-to-hard-about-them simpleminded talking points are in any way valid or acceptable, and that’s 90% what this guy‘s top comment here was. (These guys always shoehorn some sort of valid observation into their BS to try and lend legitimacy to the rest of it, by and large they haven’t caught on yet that people see through it. That and the “makes outrageous statement”/“no, no, no, OBVIOUSLY I was just joking/misspoke, I don’t believe that and would NEVER say it” dog-whistle tactic are the modern right wing’s overplayed “Stars On 45” greatest hits medley.)

        As H observed in a comment on another post today about a different situation: there’s no good guys here. This situation is the Kobayashi Maru. Trump, Biden, Harris, there was no way to win this one, from the get-go. All we can hope for is that we fail with the minimum possible destruction. Honestly, that might actually be Harris, if it has to be one of the three of them… I guess “terrible candidate but not Trump and not in the early stages of dementia” is superior to “ terrible candidate but not Trump” and “Trump”. I find it awful that this is what the choices are, though, and when Biden finally made the right and honorable choice to step down, the Democrats once again showed their skill at correctly identifying an issue and then picking the worst solution to it. It’s like they completely forgot that just 24 hours previous she was the worst possible successor.

        1. Correction: “Breitbart-style dont-think-to-hard-about-them simpleminded” should have read “Breitbart-style dont-think-to-hard-about-them simpleminded and bigoted”. I don’t wanna speak too flatteringly of what was said here.

    2. Forget Jamie – Robert Lightziger will be your bext treasury secretary. And with no reelection pressures he has zero.zero reason to appoint “the right people to govern.” Why sholuld he?

      And to your border “crisis” concerns, in the recent Bloomberg BIzweek interview with your candidate, he explicitly said that the #1 economic rebirth measure he is proposing is mass deportations. (It’ll help black people reclaim their jobs picking crops!) If that is your definition of “moderate”, well bless ylour heart.

    3. Jesus Christ “Anon,” you’re off the rails. I knew you were on your way down the right-wing rabbit hole a long time ago, but you’re lost down there now. Listen, my friend, you know you get a free pass to say pretty much what you want to say here, and you know exactly to what you owe that free pass. I’m not going to revoke it, but fair warning: Keep your “mediocre woman” bullsh-t to yourself. Or take it somewhere where that sort of thing’s acceptable. This ain’t the place for it. Nor is this an outlet for your repressed anger re: your employer’s DEI initiatives. There are plenty of insane websites where you can go and commiserate with other angry white men grappling with insecurity and feelings of inadequacy. Don’t do it here. And Kamala’s a great candidate. Trump’s a convicted felon who was found liable for sexual abuse, who bankrupts his own companies, who isn’t actually rich, who stoked a riot on the steps of the Capitol and who’d rob you blind at the first opportunity. The f-ck is the matter with you?

      1. You forgot “open white supremacist”.

        I will never understand how a US president posts a video online of a man shouting “white power” and lavishes adoring praise on that man, and four years later he’s running again, and nobody will even mention it. I just don’t understand it.

      2. Well, he did mention that “We are witnessing the ultimate gaslighting…” and we all know by now that with the tRump crew “Every accusation is a confession”. So nothing new to see here except for the exceptional moderator who never disappoints.

    4. You “recall reading …??” A really quick google search shows that BLS data says that engineering and architectural professionals unemployment peaked at 6% in June 2020 but has been averaging about 1.5% for the past 2 1/2 years. 0.8% most recently. Not very consistent with your made up recollection

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints