Kevin McCarthy To Get Unseriously Serious About US Debt Standoff

It's tax week in the US, and Kevin McCarthy is apparently poised to detail House Republicans' demands for a deal to avert a catastrophic US debt default. That should make for a fun juxtaposition. Tax receipts will refine expectations for the so-called "X-date," the threshold beyond which Janet Yellen would have to conjure other, even more "extraordinary" means by which to forestall the paroxysm that'd accompany a voluntary abrogation of the nation's financial obligations. Apparently, McCarthy

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today

View subscription options

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 thoughts on “Kevin McCarthy To Get Unseriously Serious About US Debt Standoff

  1. Real compromise would modestly raise taxes on the 95% and raise taxes much more on the top 5%, corporations, index capital gains and then tax the same as regular income, get rid of carried interest etc. It will never happen. Spending increases could be limited to nominal growth+ population growth. It will never happen.

  2. When the small, not for profit organization on whose finance committee I serve on moved its demand deposit balances into Treasury bills, going from zero % yields to over 4.5%, I told the Board:
    I do NOT expect the US Treasury to default. But if it did, I don’t think the impact on Treasury bills or Government money market funds would be materially worse than for demand deposit accounts. That is because banks hold a substantial portion of their assets in Treasury securities, so many would become insolvent. And the FDIC and SIPC balance sheets are predominantly invested in Treasury securities, so their ability to bail out depositors would also be compromised.
    Does this sound reasonable to Heisenberg readers?

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints