One Bank Sees ‘Likely Collision’ Between Powell, Stocks

The Fed “has a lot of wood to chop if they’re serious about removing the punch bowl,” Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson said, mixing metaphors in a Monday note.

One of the most vexing issues facing market participants at the current juncture is the idea that the Fed waited too long to normalize policy and as such is destined to exacerbate downward pressure on the US economy exerted by, for example, a waning consumption impulse as Americans grapple with surging costs for food and energy.

In short, the fabled “soft landing” will be very difficult to execute, if not impossible.

Read more: There Won’t Be A ‘Soft Landing’

Although Wilson didn’t rule out a benign outcome, he did underscore an important point: If the Fed somehow manages to deliver the number of hikes priced by the market over the next year while simultaneously commencing balance sheet runoff without triggering a recession, they’ll have succeeded in bringing financial repression to an end.

The figure on the left (below), shows the real shadow rate or, put differently, the policy rate adjusted for both inflation and QE. “The real Fed funds rate has been in a remarkably well-defined channel for almost 40 years,” Wilson wrote, noting that it bottomed in November, when Powell was renominated. He promptly executed a hawkish pivot that included formally denouncing the much maligned “transitory” characterization of inflation. “This is also the time when long duration equities topped and began what’s been one of the largest and most persistent drawdowns in growth stocks in history,” Wilson went on to say.

On the right is the nominal shadow rate. What you’ll note immediately is that it didn’t reach a new low during the pandemic. That’s the first time since the downtrend began that the nominal shadow rate didn’t touch a new low during a recession.

Commenting on the projected rates trajectory (red annotation in the figure on the right), Wilson wrote that, “If the Fed were to execute on such a path, it’s clear that Fed Funds Rate will break out of the 40-year downtrend [and] should the Fed also engage in… quantitative tightening, the Shadow Fed Funds Rate will rise even further outside this channel.”

Such an outcome, if delivered (and note that delivering almost by definition entails a soft landing, given that any downturn would likely mean not meeting market expectations for tightening), would “make us more comfortable with the view that financial repression is firmly in the rearview mirror,” Wilson remarked.

However, consistent with my contention that a soft landing is virtually impossible, especially if the Fed tries to deliver the tightening the market is currently pricing, Morgan Stanley went on describe a benign outcome as “a big ‘if’ at this point.”

“Growth was already at risk as we entered 2022 due to payback in demand, lapsing government transfers, generationally high inflation and rising inventories at the wrong time,” Wilson said, on the way to warning that “with the war in Ukraine leading to even higher commodity prices, the growth outlook looks even worse.”

For now, anyway, Morgan thinks the US economy can avert a recession. But earnings growth could well turn negative, especially considering the almost laughable prospect that corporate America can somehow manage to sustain record high margins in the face of sky-high input costs and wage bills, both of which are still climbing.

Wilson didn’t mince words, as he usually doesn’t. He described Morgan Stanley’s conviction level around the Fed’s intent to raise rates and wrestle inflation lower as “high.” As far as the notion that any war-related hit to growth might derail the Committee’s best laid tightening plans, Wilson said that in his view, the Fed “will keep a watchful eye on the data but err on the side of hawkishness given the state of inflation,” which he described as “now arguably out of control.”

The takeaway for equities, and especially long duration shares, is suboptimal, if not downright grim. “This likely means a collision with equity markets this spring with valuations overshooting to the downside,” Wilson said.


Leave a Reply to Prestwick AKCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 thoughts on “One Bank Sees ‘Likely Collision’ Between Powell, Stocks

  1. We will see. I just don’t believe the Fed will be able to raise rates in an impactful way – let alone shrink the balance sheet- once it starts to get ugly out there in response to their actions. They have not even gotten to “Step 1”. Statistically, 70% of recovering alcoholics relapse during the first 5 years. Stress is generally the trigger. After 40 years of drinking juice, I have my doubts that collectively, as a country, we can stick to “no more juice”.
    Abolish the Fed? Or keep it and use it to accomplish the financial goals of a select group of Americans?
    What a mess.

    1. Looking through the “risk management lens”, what’s the biggest potential problem right now? (1) A reduction in Real GDP growth, (2) An increase in the Unemployment Rate, or (3) A further acceleration of already-bad inflation to the upside ?

      I believe it’s #3, which means you have to sacrifice a bit of #1 and #2 (…the mirror image of a few years ago, when they would gladly have traded a bit of inflation for more Real GDP growth).

      In the 2-Year UST Yield chart, there is truth…

      1. @PAK: You sir, must have retired with high rank from that elite special unit, Men That Stare At Charts.

        Haven’t seen so much green on tradingeconomics.com bond 10yr cover sheet page in a long time. Clicked on the UST10yr link to open up the US treasury bond page and it was just as you prophesied. Am I looking at the awakening of a new Global Borg mind where the existential shock of pending food shortages, millions of refugees of all flesh tones on the move, simmering resentments fissuring old combatants into new larger realignments, the nascent realization that COP26 was just another pipe dream as climate change and war both push humanity back into the warm embrace of coal to cover heating and cooling demands? Top it off with the prospect of everyone watching everyone else’s plight on little screens Dr. Gerbils (or was it Dr. Goebbels? maybe it was Dr. Gerbils just in the boudoir? IDK) could only dream of, in real time, bonding all humanity together in one final death rattle? Look Mother at my extinction event selfie! … Then I remember to view the “All” data price line and I’m relieved to be reminded this is just the opening of yet another act in a long production yet to be played out.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints