The Bears Have It (And A Word On Crypto’s ‘Crash’)

For months, BofA's Michael Hartnett warned that the first half of 2022 would likely be defined by a "rate shock" with the potential to drive up volatility. Just five sessions into the new year, that prediction looked prescient. Treasury yields were higher again Friday (apparently nudged by swaps) pushing 10s near 1.80% (figure below). 5s, meanwhile, hit 1.50%, the highest in two years. "For those leaning bearishly into the new year, things appear to be going according to plan as cycle high 10-

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply to EmptynesterCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 thoughts on “The Bears Have It (And A Word On Crypto’s ‘Crash’)

  1. Love this quote H–“Sure, that’s the same greater fool theory of investing I’ve traditionally lampooned in these pages, but as you may have noticed over the past five years, there are more fools out there than many of us suspected.”

  2. When I think of crypto I think of “frontier” emerging markets. Your stake (a fraction of a fraction of an asset base) is placed because of what “could be” not what is. I’m not there yet but I continue to educate myself on it because make no mistake it is here to stay. The simple fact i am reading about it here confirms that. That said, some horses will win, some will place, maybe show, while some others……………………….

    1. Remember, every risk asset you own is valuable at some level only because of what it will be in the minds of possible buyers. There is no what it is. A bond pays interest as it represents a legal debt but the risk that it won’t pay in the future is always present. Stocks don’t have any real future to count on. Every day you own a risk asset you have made a tacit decision to reinvest in that asset because what you think what it will be is superior to what some other asset you could own will be.

  3. I have some Crytpo – BTC, ETH, LUNA, MANA and FTM – simply due to FOMO. I’ve traded it on and off for some nice profits but now I’m holding because every time I sold in the past, it would skyrocket. But I have no more in than I’m willing to lose.

  4. I might seriously look at crypto if BlackRock or Vanguard expresses any interest.
    These two “gods” control $20T AUM (on a combined basis) and as far as I can tell, neither has expressed any intention to start a crypto ETF.
    If half of their combined AUM ($10T) is in equities- they effectively are 20% of the US equities markets. Scary.
    If Larry invites Mortimer over to get carryout some night for dinner (reference to WSJ article)- I would like to order what they ordered.

  5. Interesting to read more about your own trades and (speculative) investments. Been an avid reader for 3 years, don’t really recall you doing this at all previously.

  6. “Harley Bassman is long Ether too. So, I’m in reasonably good company.” Bill Miller is waist-deep in crypto. Add him to your “reasonably good company”.

  7. H-Man, your right about disclosing a very rare peak into your portfolio. Be prepared for the onslaught of freebie investment advice seekers and remember your disclaimers on investment advice. I personally like you meandering down financial streams where you seem to see fish but always point out there are a lot of dry holes on those journeys and even if there are fish, they don’t always bite. So when do the tens crack two?

  8. I enjoyed this article very much, I’m a long time reader and your commentary on crypto has always been insightful, perhaps even more now that you have a little skin in the game.

  9. It is simply not true that gold isn’t a high value industrial metal. Gold has many important properties: it’s extremely ductile, chemically inert, highly conductive, etc. The proper characterization is that gold has myriad industrial uses that are limited by its high cost and short supply. It’s true that the supply would not be as limited if people got over their aesthetic fascination with gold–but the decline in price would be limited as industrial uses became more feasible economically. As an interesting tidbit, the recently-launched James Webb telescope has gold-plated mirrors. Why? Gold is chemically inert, and highly reflective of infrared radiation.

    To go further, while there are trans-uranic elements, you can’t simply conjure up new elements at will. Obviously, new materials (compounds, not elements) are continuously being developed, but you have to work with the ~90 elements that we have here on earth to create these new materials. I can’t decide to create a new element called “dogeium” and sell it to people and say it’s just as good as gold. Whereas I CAN (or at least somebody can) come up with a new cryptocurrency, and with a straight face, say it’s just as good as Shiba Inu coin. You can bet that Goldman or Blackrock or any other wall street player would like to be a part of this–because if they can do it right, they can effectively print their own money. It’s a question of branding and backing, I imagine. But why stop there? If the value of the coin is based on its acceptance by people, then I could see the great branding empires getting in on it. Luis Vuitton coin? Kanye coin? Kardashian coin? Of course you all know this. It’s the greater fool game, and it can go for a long time. As someone who owned stock in eToys back in the day, I get it—but I’m not going to play it.

    The only real reason I could see for regular people to actually place value in crypto is to move money out of a despotic country that doesn’t want you to move money out. There’s potential value in that.

  10. Crypto is pure internet. It couldn’t exist without it. With gold being an element we’re reasonably sure there isn’t another element on this planet waiting to be discovered that will replace it. We already see that’s not so with any version of crypto.

  11. “Gold has almost no practical use, and no intrinsic value either outside of being finite.”

    Gold and silver suffer in the marketplace precisely because they are no longer “finite”. Every real ounce is multiplied hundreds of times by paper “tokens” that investors accept as the real thing. Thus there is no scarcity.

    If I held gold as an investment, the tsunami of paper gold, crypto currencies and NFT’s, and their impact on gold’s value, would be frustrating. However, I own gold as insurance against the ongoing debasement of the dollar. Ultimately, unfortunately, it will serve it’s purpose.

    1. If the world ever gets to the point when holding gold has served its purpose- I would rather own a small cabin attached to a mini farm.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints