Poker Faces And Unreasonable People
(Editor's note: Like so many of the articles published here, I started this piece with one idea in mind, but it ultimately went in a different direction. Over time, I've developed something like disinterested disdain for a community to which most people believe I belong. I don't, in fact, belong to that community and to the extent I do, I'd rather not. Consider that some vague context for the following, which I hope is every bit as fun for you to read as it was for me to write.)
Are market part
Nice.
Powells lawyers are missing the point. Any reputable business that relied on reasonable people exclusively would have little reason to sue. Numerous members of congress and a mob attacking the Capital, as unreasonable as they may seem, proves plaintiffs point that Ms. Powell effected an adverse, unjust opinion.
Late last month, after Sidney Powell was sued for defamation, her lawyers wrote in a filing that “no reasonable person would conclude that [her] statements were truly statements of fact.”
does that not constitute an overt admission of guilt…?
“But it only seems that way to you, because you’re benchmarking the situation against your own psychological instability. Any nominally intelligent outside observer whose frame of reference isn’t solely based on investing could easily recognize signs of acute distress” Been there.
“stopping to enjoy a serene, mindful middle ground” Building here.
I created a Vangaurd target dates fund ladder adjusted for risk tolerance once a quarter by percentage of each rung held:2025 VGSTX 2030 2040 2050 2065 and a couple of familiar old traders AES and WPM tagging along.
Less hand wringing and more reading. Should i not mention i culled some WPM and bought nibble of CurlF, She does not keep me up at night. Though I kinda wish she would, she i $700 Stimmy girl.
-TB