In news that should surprise exactly nobody, initial jobless claims surged for a second week in the US.
885,000 people filed for unemployment benefits in the week through December 12. That was far more than the 815,000 consensus expected. Unadjusted claims were 947,000, the highest since July.
The disconcerting news comes on the heels of the previous week’s “surprising” rise, which was itself revised higher (i.e., worse) to 862,000. The four-week moving average is now back above 800,000.
885,000 is the worst print on initial claims since the week of September 5.
Congress was still haggling over the terms of a new virus relief package on Thursday — politics before polity. According to reports, the likely deal will include $600 direct payments to individuals and an extension of a $300 federal supplement to the unemployed.
Markets, economists, and especially lawmakers have clearly lost the plot. The fact that the stimulus deal didn’t come together until quite literally the last days of the lame duck session is proof positive that lawmakers aren’t telling the truth to suggest that their sense of urgency is tied to anything other than the calendar and the Georgia runoffs.
It’s been nearly five months since provisions from the previous relief package began to expire, including the federal assistance for the jobless. Some benefits were extended by Donald Trump via an executive order, but that process was confusing and fraught with logistical issues.
Continuing claims were 5.5 million in the week ended December 5. That was a bit better than expected. The market was looking for 5.7 million.
Initial PUA claims jumped 40,000 in the week to December 12. Ongoing PUA and PEUC claims look to have surged in the week ending November 28, by 688,793 and 268,532, respectively. There were 9.2 million people on PUA (the federal assistance program for workers not normally eligible for state jobless benefits, including the self-employed) as of late last month and 4.8 million receiving PEUC.
I suppose there’s some “nuance” to be had in these numbers (it seems like each week, somebody rolls out a new factoid or statistic that’s supposed to be “mitigating”), but my initial claim (get it?) is that these figures are disconcerting. You’d be forgiven for suggesting that new lockdowns associated with the virus surge are affecting jobs.
Obviously, one should consider this in conjunction with the disappointing November jobs report and also in the context of common sense, which dictates that things are likely to go awry when novel, deadly, viral pneumonia is allowed to spread unchecked across an economy that relies almost entirely on a high-contact services sector.
In addition to obviously not really caring about unemployment, here is another thing going on:
Out here in the mountains, it appears that those in power (Dems) got Trump’s memo about herd immunity. The gondolas, chairlifts, restaurants, bars are all packed (so I am told). In order to maintain social distancing, a reservation is required to ski–and they are all booked up! LOL (I am laughing at how ineffective this is).
If I want to ski, I am going to have to “skin up”(ugh)!
Going to be scary in about 2 weeks.
Better not count on the government to protect us!
Ah yes: the comforting lie that outbreaks are a city problem, that in God’s country, full of fresh air and sunshine, nothing bad can happen.
I suppose it’s refreshing that this isn’t a partisan issue; red or blue, rural America is falling for their own positivity bias. What I don’t quite get is: why are none of these towns and businesses paying attention to the canaries in the coal mine? Once your town goes down, good luck attracting tourists for the remainder of the winter!
CA’s big ski town (Mammoth) had a policy in place through the late season last winter: the slopes are open, but the hospitals and clinics are closed to tourists. If you get injured, kindly drive yourself back to LA!
In Switzerland, there are billboards asking those at high risk to sign DNR’s.
Makes sense to me. Can we get non-mask people to do that?
Live Free or Die?
Go ahead – leaves more for me.