Goldman: FAAMG Upside Now ‘Just 3%.’ Rest Of Market Has To Step Up

Last week, Goldman warned that market concentration had exceeded levels seen during the dot-com boom

Already have an account? log in

This article is FREE for you

Create a free account and join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree to receive communication by email

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 thoughts on “Goldman: FAAMG Upside Now ‘Just 3%.’ Rest Of Market Has To Step Up

  1. Facetiously mentioned……….The Equity markets have an uncanny talent for moving the goalposts/hurdles around at just the correct intervals with the use of analyst expectations and resultant rational for earnings… We have seen this show before …so be cautious everyone….

  2. checks notes — 28x expected 2021 EPS

    EPS which will be revised downward several times going forward, making these bubble stocks, super tulip bubble stocks with p/e ratios at levels where idiots will be hard pressed to find speculators not laughing. I realize a lot of people are morons, but how does one get into a position where information doesn’t register or process?

  3. I was surprised the Other 495 are down only 13% YTD (thru 4/30). Given the state of things, I’d say that’s where the true over-valuation lies (…at least the Group of Five have good “moats”).

    To borrow Howard Marks’s line: It seems to me that the economy is more than 13% broken right now.

  4. Mr. H,

    Why do you follow David Kostin; he’s seems to have a track record of having to u-turn on his wrong calls? Wondering if there’s something I’m missing?

    1. I would encourage you to be careful where you get your information. If you have not read the originals (which I’m assuming you haven’t), then how do you know that your assessment is correct? People spin this stuff any which way to suit the needs of their own web portals. I know this is uncomfortable for some folks to come to terms with, but it’s the truth: There are some websites out there who take this research and distort it beyond recognition on purpose in order to generate click money. Don’t fall for that, man. Please. Always consider the source. If you’re reading a website that you wouldn’t trust to give you accurate information about, say, politics, then why would you trust they are accurately representing a piece of research from Goldman? Use your brain.

10th Anniversary Boutique

Coming Soon