economy Trump

Trump, Fearing Economic Downturn, Ponders Payroll Tax Cut To ‘Arrest Slowdown’

"Their panicking and flailing is palpable".

"Their panicking and flailing is palpable".
This content has been archived. Log in or Subscribe for full access to thousands of archived articles.

20 comments on “Trump, Fearing Economic Downturn, Ponders Payroll Tax Cut To ‘Arrest Slowdown’

  1. Anonymous

    Another example of fiscal irresponsibility

  2. Anonymous

    Should have just raised rates and unwind those bond holdings while they had the chance. Dumb stupid government always screwing things up and making them worse. Today’s rally like the others will be sold. Still holding on to my SQQQ’s, I’ll eventually get my price when the market realizes what matters is price earnings ratios Goldilocks and Pollyanna are running the show now but they won’t be running it forever…

  3. Given the Total Fiscal irresponsibility to date that has ONLY benefitted the wealthy, let them at least throw a few crumbs to the middle class via a payroll tax cut….if they are worried about deficits let them roll back the tax cuts for the super wealthy and the corporates

    • Anonymous

      Agree 100% vm1953 I did vote for the President only because the alternative was 10 times as bad. I want to keep the right to bear arms, drive my current vehicle not a gore mobile, he was elected by the skin of his teeth and promised to repeal and replace Obamacare which he has not done, he promised to drain the swamp which has not done, promised to lock her up which he has not done. He passed a budget and tax cut which has done nothing but makes the problems 10 times worse. The only reason things look good is because everything is being put on the credit card of the U.S.A. and which is why he calls for rate cuts everyday because the interest on all this DEBT would break the country in two….

      • monkfelonious

        Well, there you have it! YOU voted for him so how about just shutting the FU? BTW, what would have ‘locking her up’ done for anyone, when, it seems, by your own words, that DT would be a better candidate?

        • Anonymous

          Moral Hazard and lack of respect for the rule of law is something you can’t seem to understand. We have an awful lot of that both in politics, criminal and civil court proceedings, and no real fear of being prosecuted for anything. The rule of law doesn’t mean anything to many people anymore because enforcement is selective based on your status or standing. If enforcement was equally applied to everyone the world would be a much better place. Not saying DT is perfect far from it and his rants about cutting rates are dead wrong, rates need to be increased BIG LEAGUE but having HRC would in office have made matters much worse.

  4. Don’t you worry. Trumplforskin will figure out a way to help all those poor rich folks.

  5. Harvey Cotton

    I am reminded of the Jason Statham movie “Crank.”

  6. “Après nous, le déluge.” — DJT

  7. More corporate welfare.

  8. Skin Deep

    If the trump mafia were running just their line of caviar skincare products, I’d probably just ignore them and anything insane they do, but when they run the country like a bankrupt skin care product, it does make me worry!

  9. Cutting payroll taxes would
    1. Cut Medicare funding, which fits Republican desire to undercut the ACA aka Obamacare.
    2. Cut Social Security funding, which fits with desire to cut so-called “entitlements”.
    3. Benefit employers as much as employees (the 15% payroll tax is paid 1/2 by employees via paycheck deduction, 1/2 by employers).

    With these effects on mind, I think the chances of Trump proposing a payroll tax cut are higher than one might think.

    • SS and Medicare payments could be exempted from the tax cuts. I believe they are talking about the taxes paid on your earnings due by April of the following year.

      • All the reporting refers clearly to payroll taxes, the deductions from every paycheck denoted with FICA and MEDI (or something like that) which are about 7.5% of gross pay up to around $130K. The payroll tax is actually 15%, the employer pays half &.5%) and the employee pays half (7.5%).

        I believe you’re referring to income taxes.

  10. Three Things

    “The Fed Rate, over a fairly short period of time, should be reduced by at least 100 basis points, with perhaps some quantitative easing as well. If that happened, our Economy would be even better, and the World Economy would be greatly and quickly enhanced-good for everyone!”
    8:26 AM – 19 Aug 2019
    And finally, in the midst of charting a course for monetary policy to pursue their mandates, policymakers also must take into account influences of commodity and financial markets that can provide headwinds or tailwinds to economic activity and inflation dynamics.

    Agenda will be forthcoming.

    ttps://www.kansascityfed.org/publications/research/escp/symposiums/escp-2019

    Negative and record low yields make sense for reasons that have nothing to do with investments in negative and record low yields. You have to see these assets as balance sheet tools, repo reserves whose entire purpose is to allow a firm to weather a market storm which disrupts the normal characteristics of how the world truly operates. The cost of holding those reserves is immaterial to the survival characteristics which are contained within them.

    https://www.alhambrapartners.com/2019/08/19/collateral-reserves-what-is-behind-record-low-and-negative-yields/

  11. Reduction to capital gains taxes are also being actively-discussed-but-not-officially-under-consideration.

    This might be by changing the tax rate, or by indexing to inflation. There’s been some speculation that the latter could be done by Treasury without Congressional approval.

    This would be a way to give high-wealth donors another gift, nicely timed at the top of a cycle.

  12. Trump makes his staff into liars by confirming he’s considering the payroll tax cut idea. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says-hes-thinking-about-a-payroll-tax-cut-hours-after-his-staff-denied-it/

    I’d guess wage expense for the S&P500 must be around 15% of revenue, the employer share of payroll tax should be roughly 7.5% of that or 1% of revenue.

Speak On It

Skip to toolbar