Albert Edwards: ‘By Hook Or By Crook, Jerome Powell Will Be Out’ If There’s A Recession

“If this is what President Trump is like now, imagine if I am right and the US leads the global economy into another deep recession and financial crisis like 2008”, SocGen’s Albert Edwards wrote Thursday.

The reference was to Trump’s “stubborn child” tweet, which Edwards calls “unusually gratuitous criticism”. You know you’ve made it as a Fed critic when even Albert characterizes your derisive comments about the central bank as “gratuitous”.

To be sure, Albert doesn’t jump at the opportunity to castigate Trump for his encroachment on Fed independence, but he does acknowledge the glaringly obvious game plan. “As a long time harsh critic of the Fed (and other central banks) for their obscenely easy money policies, I am loath to critique President Trump’s punchy comments”, he writes, adding that Trump “has a very clear agenda”.

That agenda: The White House is setting up the Fed to be the fall guy if a recession comes calling in 2020 and the stock market dives ahead of the election.

Albert proceeds to run through a list of potentially ominous economic indicators, starting with the re-steepening of the curve. “We (and others), have also pointed out that the alarm bells for an imminent recession would really start ringing if the 10y-2y curve began to steepen”, Edwards writes, on the way to noting that while the 2s10s hasn’t really broken out to the upside yet, “the rest of the yield curve (which leads to 10y-2y steepening) is now shouting recession from the rooftops”.


Recall that the 2s10s steepened dramatically in the wake of the Fed decision and Powell’s presser last Wednesday.

The May jobs report gets a mention, and Albert warns that while you might dismiss it as a “glitch” (Larry Kudlow-style), there are other indicators worth taking note of. For instance, Edwards observes that “the wholly separate Conference Board Survey showed a massive 4.6% leap in the percent of respondents saying jobs are hard to get”.

Is that notable? Well, historically it is. As he goes on to point out, a surge like that has only been observed on a handful of occasions since 1974.


As it turns out, that series tracks the curve pretty well. Albert concedes that “a bull might point out the jump has come from near record lows”. That said, he cautions against writing it off entirely. “We ignore these things at our peril, and then in the benefit of hindsight we kick ourselves for ignoring the warning signs”, he chides.


Albert adds quite a bit of additional color on the apparent de-anchoring of inflation expectations and the prospect of a euro rally as the dollar loses both economic and monetary pillars of support, but the gist of Thursday’s missive is that a recession is either coming soon or is already here.

We should note that while some pundits (read: one CNBC personality) enjoy criticizing Edwards’s persistently bearish takes, one look at developed market bond yields suggests his famous “Ice Age” thesis has been proven at least some semblance of correct.

As far as what Edwards sees in Jerome Powell’s future, SocGen’s incorrigible but affable bear is unequivocal. “Even before the irascible Trump became President, I said the Fed would lose its (supposed) independence if they were the midwife to another crisis”, he writes. “By hook or by crook, Powell will be out on his ear” if the economy goes into recession ahead of the next election.


Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 thoughts on “Albert Edwards: ‘By Hook Or By Crook, Jerome Powell Will Be Out’ If There’s A Recession

  1. Powell is a lawyer. If Trump fires him, Powell should refuse to leave. Absent being carried away in handcuffs, he should not go. This is not a situation where you can file a lawsuit and win damages for back pay in 2 years. If the law says the President can only fire for cause, let the President prove in court that he has good cause. If the point of the statute is simply to have a court slap the wrists of a former President after 2 or 3 years of litigation, it is meaningless. I’m not a huge Powell fan, but giving the President the right to fire without cause is the same as saying that Fed Chair is just a political position. Maybe I need to create a Kickstarter page so we can buy a couple years of dried foods from those survivalist companies and have it shipped to Powell’s office.

    1. The inbred thinking in this administration indicates that the whole group operates at Trump’s whims and defines “political Position”….

    1. Doesn’t that portend a de facto protracted time period – and Orangehole will be gone by then. It’s a looooong line Powell will be queued on…

  2. I’d be willing to endure a recession (which I don’t think Powell is trying to instigate, he’s just, rightly, cautious), if it meant Trump didn’t get re-elected in 2020. Powell’s only fault was when Trump said “jump!” Powell didn’t say, “How high?”

    1. Just this week Powell actually seemed to display his metaphorical male genitalia in that speech about an independent Fed; or, as Orangehole probably heard it, Powell effectively said “how’s ’bout I grab YOU, Pussy?”

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints