fed fomc Markets

Vice Chair Clarida Isn’t Sure You’re Getting The Message

Any perceived recalcitrance will be met with jeers.

As a matter of course, we try to avoid commenting on intraday soundbites from Fed officials who aren’t named Jerome Powell because, in case you haven’t noticed, someone is on the tape with something pretty much every day.

There’s usually some discernible strategy, whereby the procession of speakers are trying to either walk back or reinforce the message from the latest FOMC meeting, and to the extent that strategy is identifiable, there’s some utility in documenting how it evolves over the course of a given week. But more often than not, intraday moves predicated on one soundbite or another are quickly faded or else overshadowed by an errant tweet from the only policymaker who really matters: Donald Trump.

But on Tuesday, Vice Chair Clarida showed up on Bloomberg TV and his comments are worth mentioning, because he went out of his way to reiterate Powell’s message from last week’s post-FOMC press conference.

Read more: ‘Plain English’ Goes Awry – Again

Following that presser, some analysts questioned whether Clarida and others would attempt to soften the blow from what was perceived as hawkish “plain English” from chair Powell. Suffice to say Clarida’s Bloomberg appearance did not serve that purpose.

“We think the US economy and monetary policy is in a good place right now”, he said, on the way to reiterating Powell’s contention that the Fed doesn’t “see a strong case to move rates in either direction”.

Clarida went on to acknowledge recent softness in inflation, but he doubled down on the “transitory” narrative. “[It’s been] on the soft side, but we think there are some temporary factors” at play, he said, before contending that “we think the policy we have in place and the outlook we have for the economy will be consistent with” getting inflation sustainably to 2%.

There’s nothing “new” there, per se, and that is indeed the problem. One of the first things we noted on Sunday evening following Trump’s out-of-the-blue trade escalation was that it came hot on the heels of Powell’s efforts to play down the odds of a so-called “insurance cut”.

There are three factors driving risk asset performance in 2019: 1) trade optimism, 2) central banks’ dovish pivot and 3) an inflection in China’s economy.

Point 1 is clearly in doubt and while central banks are still demonstrably dovish (and will doubtlessly remain so for the foreseeable future), it’s “never enough for the market” (as Powell put it in 2012). The Fed gave us an indefinite pause and an end-date for balance sheet runoff, but now folks want a cut. Anything short of that is perceived as marginally hawkish, which undercuts point 2 above. Of course, an escalation in trade tensions has the potential to undercut point 3. All of that together accounts for this:

To be clear, stocks were already on the back foot on Tuesday before Clarida’s remarks hit, but for the reasons outlined above, the vice chair did not help the general mood.

With the RBA on hold overnight (a relatively hawkish outcome even as it raises the odds of at least one cut later), China’s trade data on deck and the Trump administration seemingly dug in, any perceived recalcitrance from the Fed will likely be greeted with jeers from the peanut gallery.



3 comments on “Vice Chair Clarida Isn’t Sure You’re Getting The Message

  1. George says:

    All of what we see day to day on the domestic front is being played out in a greater Geopolitical context… To try to interpret every bit of news without consideration of a bigger picture is tantamount to playing poker with only half of a deck of cards. The fact that there are irrational players involved only makes unintended results more likely . The Chinese and Russians take this process a lot more seriously and with a longer term horizon than do we…. I think !!!!

  2. Ria says:

    I am in the peanut gallery I guess. The next Fed move should be a cut, the last move to tighten in my view was not necessary and was an unforced error. The other view is that gdp was 3.2% in q1 payrolls are strong etc. The growth number was soft, final sales were weak. Payrolls are a lagging indicator. All the recent news suggest corporate profits will struggle, and of course the next shoe to drop is production and finally employment. Nominal growth is also low which suggests there is little room for error and the economy is very vulnerable, more than usual to a shock.

  3. Peter Lovingston says:

    Thanks for the write up, H. Watched the live interview and was hoping you were going to do a write up.

    Do anyone have a video of the interview from today? The Bloomberg person asked Clarida about restarting QE or if it will be ineffective and was a one time “tool”. Forgot how he (Clarida) responded and sounds like a critical sound bite for considering future inflation implications. Thank you!

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar