economy Markets

‘Tariff Man’ Hit With $621 Billion Worth Of Trade Deficit Kryptonite

Congratulations are in order for "President T".

Congratulations are in order for “President T“.

Under the careful tutelage of Donald Trump – shrinker of deficits extraordinaire -America’s trade gap exploded to $621 billion in 2018, the widest in a decade.

That means that under “Tariff Man”, America’s trade gap has surged by $119 billion (it sat at $502 billion in 2016).


In December, the deficit widened to $59.8 billion. That too is the highest in a decade. Exports in the final month of last year plunged 1.9% MoM, the biggest drop since early 2016.

If you run through the Commerce Department’s Wednesday report, it is chock-full of figures and statistics that quite clearly suggest Trump was mistaken to assert that his policies would swiftly lead to more “winning” on trade.

For instance, the merchandise trade deficit with China ballooned to a record $419.2 billion last year – a record. America’s goods deficit with the world widened to a record $891 billion, up $140 billion since Trump took office.


And it just goes on and on (and on). The merchandise gap with the EU notched a new record as well, for example.

This is indicative of what happens when someone who lacks any semblance of foresight  is allowed to make important decisions. Trump’s presidency is replete with examples of policy choices backfiring thanks in large part to his penchant for shooting from the hip.

He does not understand global trade and as little as he knows about international commerce, he knows even less about what tariffs actually are (i.e., a tax on domestic businesses and consumers). And yet he habitually doubles down, with the most absurd example being his infamous “Tariff Man” moniker.

Read more

Trump Enters Phone Booth, Opens Twitter, Emerges As ‘Tariff Man’

According to Trump’s own account (as delivered in November during an interview with the Washington Post), his “gut” tells him “more sometimes than anybody else’s brain can”. To be sure, his “gut” is large, but very much contrary to his own assessment, his brain is not, and because he won’t listen to what anyone else’s brain tells him, he’s inclined to trust his childlike instincts which tell him that shrinking trade deficits is as simple as slapping tariffs on America’s trade partners. After all, “trade wars are good, and easy to win” – to quote Trump.

Subjugating all other considerations to one’s instincts is an inherently perilous way to go about making policy for anyone. For Trump, it’s a sure fire way to embarrass himself and, in the process, the country he runs.

It didn’t take a “stable genius” to know that if you threaten to slap tariffs on key imports from China, importers would then scramble to get out ahead of those duties. Similarly, you didn’t have to be an economist to predict that Beijing’s retaliatory tariffs would end up hurting exports. Further, you didn’t need a PhD to understand that setting out to rewrite the rules of global trade and commerce after decades of globalization and supply chain integration would likely imperil global growth, thereby hurting demand for the goods America produces.

Literally all of that is common sense. But Trump lacks common sense. And if you’re going to be guided by your “gut”, there are only two things that stand between you and bad decisions: common sense and mere happenstance.

Of course the irony in all of this is that trade is not a “game” that can be “won”. Nobody “wins” a trade war and even if you could conjure some metric that might constitute “victory”, the trade deficit is not that measure.

As Janet Yellen put it last month while opining on the extent to which Trump lacks a basic understanding of macroeconomics, “I think almost any economist would tell you that there’s no real meaning to bilateral trade deficits, and it’s not an appropriate objective of policy.”

Thank God for that – because if we’re going by trade deficits, America didn’t do too much “winning” in 2018.

11 comments on “‘Tariff Man’ Hit With $621 Billion Worth Of Trade Deficit Kryptonite

  1. Curt Tyner

    The donald is on quite the “tired of winning streak” I must say (said in voice of Martin Short of course). Sh*t, any more winning and we will be broke……ummmm……oops…..we already are and getting more broke by the day. 22T and counting, so much for the donald’s promise that we will be debt free at the end of his second (yikes) term in office.

    Now the fool has to run in 2020 and win (double yikes) in the hopes of staying a half-a-step ahead of the law. I’m pretty sure he’s regretting opening his big mouth about how easy trade wars are to win, rightttttttttt.

  2. Harvey Darrow Cotton

    Thankfully none of this matters to Trump. Fox or Fox Business won’t say boo about it and that is all Cro-MAGAs watch anyway. Trump will dispatch Ross or Kudlow or Miller to say the trade debt is going DOWN and that the only reason it is going UP anyway is because of Obama or House Democrats. The actors and stage props in media will dutifully echo, “Some say numbers are going up, but Administration officials say numbers are going down” and Americans will get their eyes glazed over and think about who the singer is in the bunny mask on TV.

  3. This is a pretty good Op-Ed piece, well done

    • Also, did you make that graphic yourself? 🙂

      • I make all the graphics. literally everything on this site with the exception of a few guest posts from Kevin (MacroTourist) and Bjarne (Notes From Disgraceland) is me. if all I had to do was write, i’d be doing 15 posts a day. but i do the design, the graphics, the ads, all of it.

        • monkfelonious

          Oooh, question I asked long ago answered. Bravo! A new appreciation. You might take a look at this:

          I said at the time mentioned, best graphics of any site. I notice that even the bigs are making McConnell look smooth at times.

  4. Anonymous

    You can’t fix stupid….

  5. On the chart of world trade deficit, are the years 2016 and 2018 reversed?

  6. Anonymous

    Heis, I think you have the wrong perspective on this. Dollar rise makes imports cheaper and exports more expensive.
    Collapse the dollar and trade deficit will decrease – easy as that (almost) It’s as if you want the U.S. to go into recession – that would start to equalize trade imbalance – but at what cost?

  7. Sing it, Walt !

Speak On It

Skip to toolbar