This week began with Donald Trump ringing the opening bells of both the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. Sort of.
Flanked by small children, some of whom were visibly confused, Trump rang a golden replica chime placed atop the Resolute Desk. A group of adults assembled to indulge a manchild’s vanity clapped dutifully.
The Oval Office event marked the official launch of so-called “Trump Accounts,” tax-advantaged investment vehicles seeded by one-off, $1,000 contributions from the US Treasury. All American children born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, are eligible.
It’s not the worst idea Trump’s ever had, I’ll give him that, although the personalized branding makes it clear who this is really about — namely Trump, not the kids.
Because no Trump administration event would be complete without flagrant crony capitalism, Trump plugged Dell computers during his remarks. “Go out and buy a Dell,” he said. The stock rose sharply. By the time the closing bell sounded, Michael Dell and his wife, Susan, recouped the entirety of their charitable donation to the initiative. On paper at least.
Specifically, the Dell family pledged $6.25 billion in $250 “Trump Account” deposits for qualifying children in underserved ZIP codes. Dell’s on-paper net worth rose by $7 billion after Trump’s product endorsement. The stock was up more than 14% for the week through Friday morning, pushing Dell’s personal net worth higher by more than $20 billion over just four days.
True to form, Trump was open about his intentions. “We’re going to get him that money back one way or the other,” he said, of Dell’s contributions to the accounts. “And then I’ll ask for another $6 billion.” I hesitate the use the word “forthcoming,” but… well, as Dave Chappelle famously put it, Trump’s “an honest liar.”
Scott Bessent’s pretty proud of the program. “Our president is creating an ownership economy where all citizens become shareholders,” he declared. “This will be one of the president’s most enduring legacies.” Add it to the list: Two impeachments, one armed insurrection, war with Iran, “Trump Accounts.” And he’s still got two years left on this term. That’s more than enough time to add another couple of “enduring legacies.”
Anyway, as Reuters’ Jacob Bogage was keen to remind voters in a decent Friday piece, stock ownership in America’s so heavily skewed towards the well-off that the situation’s more or less hopeless if the goal really is to create a more egalitarian wealth distribution.
The figure below shows you an updated version of a familiar chart. Although the share of overall corporate equities held by the richest Americans has indeed come down since peaking near 52.5% in 2019, it’s up nearly 7.5ppt over the long run.
You’ve probably run across charts purporting to show a sharp increase in equity ownership among the bottom 50% of American households. The problem with those visuals is simple: By isolating that cohort, the charts are (purposefully in some cases) devoid of context.
Here’s the in-context reality: Even after doubling since early 2020, the share of shares, so to speak, held by the poorest Americans is just 1.1%. That’s the green area in the chart you can barely see even if you squint.
And, just as important for the domestic political discussion, the share held by the middle class remains near an all-time low and is down more than 5.5ppt since the unofficial inauguration of shareholder capitalism in the late 1980s.
None of that’s to say “Trump Accounts” aren’t a good idea. As Trump ideas go, they’re a veritable epiphany.
But when Trump says, as he did last week while remarking on the financial windfall he and his family have enjoyed since he returned to office, that “everybody’s profiting because the stock market’s going up,” that simply isn’t true.
Unless of course the only people worth counting in the definition of “everybody” are households whose financial circumstances rank them 90%ile or higher.



And when foreigns and commercials will not buy long bonds to keep the deficit interest paid, we may get the “Trump Sovereign Wealth Fund” to absorb crony shares and the toxic paper. I wonder if bonds would get ‘yippy’ about that? Today’s Fed Monetary Report doesn’t mention the SWF explicitly, but it does outline the Capture Machinery surprisingly well.
I was searching for a neutral way to refer to Trump accounts when talking with tax clients and settled on “§530A account”. I have some hope for that one, after all no one refers to a Coverdell ESA by it’s creator’s name anymore.
The practicalities of the Trump account seem strange to me. You defer taxes during a period in a person’s life when they are typically in the lowest bracket they will ever be in, then give them access all at once at a point when they are likely to be maximally irresponsible with the money. Some, I assume, will use it correctly.
This will bankroll many Robinhood accounts in 20 years. That money will eventually flow up as all these kids end up addicted to gambling and lose it all to the machines.
I do agree that it’s great kids will at least get something, but it’s a pittance compared to what it costs to get started in life these days and I personally can’t get past the name to even consider putting money in one since my kids didn’t qualify for any of the free money.
Will there be an option to directly send the proceeds to a sports betting account?
If the parents and grandparents are not the ones giving and overseeing these gifts, it probably won’t help the kids in any way, but it does put some of our tax money back into the free enterprise system, instead of
ballrooms and reflecting swamps.