Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
There’s A Bear In There
The holiday-shortened US trading week wasn't kind to equities.
The world's benchmark risk asset par excellence headed into Friday afternoon on track for its worst week in 18 months, a near 5% pullback capped by a jobs-day downtrade.
Suffice to say stocks weren't enamored with the prospect of a decelerating US labor market and a Fed that might be behind the curve.
A lot of the concern appeared to stem from revisions which lopped a combined 86,000 jobs from the June and July NFP headlines. Th
Practically every known macro “recession inbound” warning indicator has been triggered by now. Whether it is yield curve inversion, de-inversion, housing volumes, change in continuing claims, leading indicators, etc. I just finished looking at a slide deck with dozens of time-tested indicators, many I hadn’t heard of. All triggered. Some of these have long and variable lead times to the recessions they have reliably forecasted over the past many decades, others have short lead times. All triggered.
Practically all the current positive macro data can be shown to be unreliable as contra-indicators to inbound recession. Meaning, in the past these data series have sometimes looked fine until suddenly they weren’t.
Many of those inbound recession indicators have been triggered, and thus increasingly wrong, for quarters if not years. And many things in the pandemic and post-pandemic economy and market have not followed historical patterns. Believing in those patterns would have cost a lot of performance over the past few years. Like, career-ending amounts of lost performance.
We seem to be in a stage when investors swing weekly or monthly between extremes of optimism and pessimism. Two datapoints is a trend, three a confirmation, four a funeral – and contrariwise on the flip side.
And, of course, the data and patterns that actually move the market week to week are those from systematics and derivatives – not the macro data.
It is unsatisfying. It is September.
Well put JL.
In the meantime, one satisfying thing is the market rotation, with defensive sectors outperforming and cyclical esp tech underp’ing. It’s a lot easier, in my opinion, to find buyable names in staples, healthcare, utilities than in Mega land.
If the Fed is to be given credit for stopping inflation then it was through aggressive rate hikes and quantitative tightening that began in April 2022. The effect was with a “long and variable lag” that has led us to where we are now. Now the Fed is trying to back the family truckster into the garage with the gas pedal still on “aggressive”. I would argue that the time to begin slowing down was before the car was back in the garage. Being conservative is fine to a point, but it is clear that the lag is over. At this point, I would argue in favor of a 200 basis point cut to remove all restrictiveness to prevent a hard crash into the back wall.
It seems that at least a part of the economy is supported by the AI boom. The primarily players in this space are not affected by interest rates, except if rates go down their earnings drop.
Recently it has been predicted that the new energy economy will gain importance, and industry which is affected by interest rates. Recently AES has indicated starting construction of solar ‘farms’ with robots, this is not the only example of maturing renewable technology. Does this indicate time has come for rapid expansion of the renewable economy?
So is it that lower interest rates at this moment going to set off a stock market rise? Not so much in AI but in energy?
I have been thinking about getting back into renewable names. They have been an awful place. But with AI set to increase electricity demand by some ridiculous amount, and barriers to Chinese products likely to rise, maybe some of these companies can actually make money.
Long green energy if Harris wins, sell if Trump wins.
“The yield curve inversion – I think this one but some people say this one – probably indicates a recession sometime in the next two to three years.”
Nods head approvingly. “Raises for the men.”
I wonder if a 50 wouldn’t kindle some hiring in manufacturing. If they’re trying to play D on trump (which I actually think they have proven they’re not) now is their last chance.