Should’ve Cut! US Manufacturing Waylaid As Jobs Gauge Plunges

The Fed should've cut rates this week. I'm just kidding. But that's what some folks will say in the event the balance of the US macro data between now and the September FOMC meeting looks anything like Thursday's ISM manufacturing report covering July. The marquee gauge of factory activity in the US printed a pretty bad miss on the headline. 46.8 looked decidedly rough, and it undershot consensus by a meaningful margin, where that means by a country mile. Economists wanted 49. ISM manufactu

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today

View subscription options

Already have an account? log in

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 thoughts on “Should’ve Cut! US Manufacturing Waylaid As Jobs Gauge Plunges

  1. ZIRP part deux coming soon to a theater near you! We’ll still have a divided government after November (Dems – House and Presidency, Republicans – Senate), which will lead to gridlock while the economy stalls and the Fed steps in with the cuts.

  2. looking at equity prices 9:30 pacific, i’d have to suggest that bad news = bad news today. Has the lens flipped, and you know all those old sayings, ‘be careful what you wish for …’?

  3. From ISM report

    “all six of the largest manufacturing industries — Machinery; Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Chemical Products; and Computer & Electronic Products — contracted in July . . .

    The five manufacturing industries reporting growth in July are: Printing & Related Support Activities; Petroleum & Coal Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Furniture & Related Products; and Nonmetallic Mineral Products.

    The 11 industries reporting contraction in July — in the following order — are: Primary Metals; Plastics & Rubber Products; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Wood Products; Paper Products; Chemical Products; and Computer & Electronic Products.”

  4. Well, I guess if the unemployment rate climbs enough to trigger the Sahm rule tomorrow we can expect selling to accelerate. Nothing surprising here really, Fed behind the curve, recession scare, seasonality, geopolitics, election jitters, the only thing surprising is how resilient markets have been so far.

  5. Lots of sale pricing in the consumer area, certainly clothes and non-essentials. And then there’s the big elephant: automobiles. Vehicles are starting to pile up at dealers and EVs are really sucking wind. The pandemic created quite a few wrinkles in ‘the force Luke’ and the unravelling is not going to be smooth. Consumption patterns have all been severely disrupted.

  6. It is puzzling to me that the ISM Manufacturing Index and the Federal Reserve’s Industrial Production Index (link below) are painting quite different pictures.

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1r9Ha

    As I understand it, the former is intended to reflect the latter but be more timely (in ISM series, July is available now, while in Fed series, only June is available).

    However, historically ISM PMI has at time diverged significantly from Industrial Production Index. Markit (now SP Global) PMI has also diverged significantly from Industrial Production Index, and the two PMIs have often diverged significantly from each other. See charts on page 3 here https://cdn.ihsmarkit.com/www/pdf/0222/IHS-Markit-vs-ISM-PMI_2018.pdf and also discussion here https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/mi/research-analysis/explaining-us-manufacturing-pmi-survey-divergences-Oct19.html

    Just eyeballing all those charts, my vague sense is that the PMIs are more volatile than actual Industrial Production and sharp moves up or down in the PMIs should be taken with some salt.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints