In a best-case scenario, US equities could rise another 16% through year-end.
That’s according to Goldman’s David Kostin, who raised his S&P target in light of “milder than average negative EPS revisions” and a higher modeled multiple.
Kostin now sees the benchmark sitting near 5600 at year-end in his base case. The bank’s old target was 5200. Long story short, Kostin was (past tense) assuming a year-end forward multiple of 19.5x on a lower bottom-up consensus 2025 EPS estimate. Although he still expects some multiple compression from current levels, the index should nevertheless trade above 20x at year-end, he said, and Goldman now expects company analysts to revise their collective 2025 EPS estimate of $279 by a mere 2%. That gets you to 5578 SPX.
“Historically, starting [in] June of the previous year, consensus estimates have been cut by an average of 7% [but] we expect revisions… will continue to be milder-than-average through year-end given the upward revisions to mega-cap tech earnings that have already taken place this year,” Kostin wrote.
Needless to say, the cap-weighted index multiple trades at a massive premium (30%) to the equal-weighted multiple. That gap will be 36% by year-end Kostin reckons, assuming earnings growth expectations for the mega-caps “gradually converge towards the typical stock.”
There were no changes to Goldman’s 2024 and 2025 aggregate EPS estimates, which remain $241 and $256, respectively. Kostin still suspects consensus is too optimistic on margins.
As alluded to above (and as shown in the figures), Kostin has four alternative scenarios for US equities, the most bullish of which is defined by “continued mega-cap exceptionalism.” In that scenario, the S&P would end the year at 6300 and would trade at 23x, a 45% premium to the equal-weighted index.
The other bull case is a “catch-up” scenario that finds the index rising around 9% to 5900 at year-end on multiple expansion for the equal-weighted gauge, which would trade to 18x, the pre-pandemic high, shrinking the premium for the cap-weighted index.
In the event growth estimates for the market leadership prove too rosy, stocks could succumb to a “catch-down.” In that scenario, the S&P ends the year at 4700. “Strong upward revisions to earnings creates a higher bar for [the mega-caps],” Kostin remarked, “particularly as investors have started to focus more on seeing revenues from investments in AI.
If investors start to worry about a recession, stocks could correct to 4800. “Although our economists still forecast above consensus economic growth, further weak growth data could reignite anxiety over a slowdown and push the P/E multiple down to 18x,” Kostin said, adding that “downside would be limited as the Fed would have ample room to cut interest rates if economic data deteriorate meaningfully.”



5600, 5200, 5578, 6300, 5900, 4700, 4800. Unless there’s significant earnings surprises, or changes in interest rates.
Come bonus time, he’ll likely be able to point out at least one correct prediction.
Yeah, I mean, look: It’s easy to make that joke, and I go back and forth on whether to make it myself or not. But I gotta admit that over the years I’ve come to prefer these sorts of notes to stubborn adherence to a specific target. Nobody knows where a given benchmark’s going to end up over the near- to medium-term. It’s a complete crapshoot. Anyone who picks one target and ends up being “right” is only right by accident. Given that, I’d rather read a scenario analysis. And it’s worth noting that Kostin does a pretty good job of staying on the right side of things with his base case. Sure, he adjusts it (marks it to market) fairly often, but what can you do? This isn’t a job (forecasting benchmark equities) that’s conducive to success if success is accurately forecasting year-end index levels. Everyone knows that’s impossible.
It’s hard to know where stocks go with all the variables. The consensus in my ria study group is to ignore politics. Look what just happened in France. Some good companies there corrected in double digits there due to politics. It could happen here as well. My base case basically is status quo in the US. Split Congress, Biden re-elected. How confident am I of this forecast? Not very much. Anyone who says with certainty where the stock market is going in the next 12 months is guessing. Don’t bet the farm.
Don’t understand….Why base on $279 versus $256 if he believes the margins too optimistic?
The market’s priced (theoretically) off consensus bottom-up, not any one bank’s top-down estimate. And it’s a forward multiple, which is to say the market’s going to price it in long before anybody knows what actual, realized earnings are for 2025. So, it’s 20.4 * $279 * 0.98 = 5,578 or ~5600 SPX