Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
Biden Strong-Armed Dutch Government, ASML On China Sales: Reports
How many times have Biden administration officials suggested, implicitly or otherwise, that the goal of US export restrictions and investment curbs isn't to impede China's economic advancement? And how disingenuous is that contention?
A lot and very. Biden officials (and Biden himself, for that matter) have suggested as much on any number of occasions, and it's very disingenuous.
Plainly, curtailing the free flow of technology impedes economic development. It was, after all, the free flow of t
Possibly even more important to the future decline of China as an economic powerhouse than this news is the fact that the child-bearing aged women of China are completely fed up with Xi. Borrowing from Seinfeld, “No children for you!”
See the WSJ article in today’s paper, “China is Pressing Women to Have More Babies. Many Are Saying No.”
They are in the age bracket of children born during the “one-child” policy era. Boys were preferred, with “lucky” girls who were not wanted getting sent to orphanages. Some were adopted overseas, such as the adopted daughters of some of my friends. They grew up well enough, but the orphanage system seemed to be a bit of a trauma for those who were adopted at older ages (up to the age of 12). Somehow, I not surprised they may have developed a negative view of parenthood, especially if there are no (known) grandparents for support.
War is inevitable….with Netherlands ?? (just kidding)
Historically, these guys were the boss of Europe for many years. Read about the Thirty Years War against Spain. The Dutch were strong. They laid the groundwork for the modern global economy.
The guy who was supposedly going to be soft on China is harder on them than his predecessor just less boisterous. He has done more to improve the US economy vis a vis China than any trade warrior ever did. And why shouldn’t he be obviously misleading, that’s Xi’s SOP.
How much longer will the US be able to strong arm other nations to impose restrictions on technology sales to China? South Korea and, to a lesser extent, Japan were dragged in kicking & screaming when the first round was rolled out. The Netherland was the toughest lift, so I’m a little surprised that they caved again.
Some countries don’t share our view of immanent peril and look to support the interest of their major exporters. They are following the recommendations that Trump offered in his inaugural address to the UN: “Wise leaders always put the good of their own people and their own country first.”
Another round may prove more difficult.
Meanwhile … the Taiwan elections loom on January 13th. Recent polling suggests that the pro-independence DPP is leading, but still garnering less than 40% support. Thanks to the first past the post system, they will probably win a plurality.
But the question then may be, how much support will military action to support Taiwan garner in the US Congress when a majority of voters supported the two parties who favor better relations with the PRC?
How many of the “voters who favor better relations with PRC”… would agree to be taken over by PRC. Better relations are great in principle…. but that’s not an option being offered by PRC. Xi has made it really clear that he insists on reunification period.
How do you know what the PRC has offered BEFORE the DPP took power? Or what might be offered to a less strident administration?
For the pragmatists, the HK outcome may not be as off-putting as bitter emigres would like you to believe. I’m surprised by how many friends with the ability to leave (via a spouse with citizenship in Canada or Australia for example) have stayed put.
The biggest risk, imho, is that China’s imploding economy and demographics speed up; resulting in the demise of Xi/communism/authoritarian controlled economy- at which point, China fully embraces capitalism.
At that point, the US will really have something to worry about. I think this could be in less than 10 years.
In our ageist society, it is common to underestimate Biden because he is, looks, and sounds old. He’s the most experienced person ever to take the Presidency, and by legislative accomplishments with the thinnest margin in Congress, maybe the most effective. At heart a pragmatic centrist, Biden knows how to dissemble and prevaricate every bit as well as Xi.