Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today
Already have an account? log in
The American Dream Has Never Been Less Affordable
Houses: People need them, but people can't afford them.
It's a problem when you need something you can't afford. If the context is food, you could starve. If the context is housing, you could end up homeless, like more than half a million people across the richest nation the world's ever known.
I doubt America's legions of increasingly desperate would-be homeowners were glued to the bond market in recent weeks, but they should've been. Because the epic rally at the longer end of the Treasury c
If spreads (now about 300bp) were at more typical levels (150-200bp), mortgages would be more like high 5%s to 6%. If rate volatility subsides, spreads should narrow. If the Fed resumed buying MBS – well, that seems unlikely.
Suppose mortgage rates decline to 5.5-6.0%. The would-be borrower seeking a $400K mortgage could save $330/month from the payment at 7.0%. Or could borrow $455,000 instead. (Roughly – just poking at HP12C buttons.)
Are we confident which it would be?
Good post John L
Nice to see you again RIA.
+1
A couple of questions:
Per John L—Why is it so much higher?
I read today that the official numbers for shelter inflation in the CPI data tends to track the S&P Case Shiller house price index but with a 16 month lag. If that pattern holds then shelter inflation is due for a big drop in 1H2024. The info came from Troy Ludka of SMBC Nikko. What does shelter inflation mean/include?
I believe spreads are high because rates have been volatile and rising. If you’re a mortgage lender and lock a borrower’s mortgage rate for XX days, if rates move up the borrower will take advantage of the locked mortgage rate, while if rates move down the borrower will simply go with someone else’s lower mortgage rate. Also, the Fed stopped buying MBS as part of QT.
About 1/4 of CPI shelter inflation is “rent”, based on a survey of renters and thus a blend of new and renewed leases. This should lag indicies of asking rents (since those are new lease prices) and reported blended rents from the public apartment REITs (I think they have more new units, more rapid turnover, different geographic and unit type mix than the total national rental housing stock). Right now the asking rent indicies are flat to down and REITs are reporting positive low-single-digit percent YOY blended rent increases (from memory, may not be right) so eventually rent inflation might look like +LSD% YOY.
About 3/4 of CPI inflation is “owners’ equivalent rent” (OER) based on a survey of homeowners who are asked what their houses would rent for. This OER measure was introduced some decades ago, and replaced the previous method of tracking house values. The idea was supposedly that OER isolates the shelter aspect of owning a house, while house values reflects the investment aspect. OER tends to follow but lag house prices, presumably if you think your house is worth more to sell you also think it is worth more as a rental. Since house prices were flat YOY for a time this year, the hope is that OER will eventually go to flattish. On the other hand, if house prices go on a second run in 2024, are homeowners going to remember the flat period in mid 2023? I personally think homeowners have only the vaguest idea what their houses would actually rent for (I don’t) and that OER is a bad measure.