‘Persistent’

Jerome Powell was asked on Wednesday if, and to what degree, the recent selloff at the long-end of the US Treasury curve stood in for Fed action at the November FOMC meeting. That was the question. While editorializing around the new policy statement, I briefly recapped recent events: Officials spent the better part of October explaining how and why the rapid rise in long-end US Treasury yields witnessed since early August could theoretically substitute for a rate hike, or anyway assist the Fed

Join institutional investors, analysts and strategists from the world's largest banks: Subscribe today for as little as $7/month

View subscription options

Or try one month for FREE with a trial plan

Already have an account? log in

Speak your mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 thoughts on “‘Persistent’

  1. The Fed was “done” a couple meetings ago, and is “well done” now. Of course there is some economic scenario that would push the Fed out of “watchful waiting”, but absent significant and sustained inflation re-acceleration, or a major economic deterioration or financial breakage, the Fed is now a non-factor. It feels like a long time since one could last say that.

  2. I think Chair Powell is getting better at this. His non-answer answers help keep the fast-money folks from calling the shots. If Powell’s legacy as Fed chair is that he got the horse back in front of the cart, well, that would be a good thing.

NEWSROOM crewneck & prints