You need a PLUS account to view this content. Try one month of PLUS for FREE.
Already have an account? log in
A.I. Everywhere
Sam Altman expressed concern about the A.I. programs he's developing during remarks to US lawmakers on Tuesday.
"I think if this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong and we want to be vocal about that," he said, during some three hours of testimony. "We want to work with the government to prevent that from happening."
He conceded that OpenAI's technology will likely eliminate some jobs, even as it creates new employment opportunities. Altman seemed apprised of the risks around governme
Nobody, nobody, nobody seems to have noticed that, while this technology suddenly works way better than it previously did, it still doesn’t work very well.
It’s good for media editing and generation. It can transfer a visual style between images very well. It can actually write a convincing sonnet upon request, which is understandably astounding. But try getting it to write an incisive essay better than a human could, without huge factual mistakes in it. Try to use it to generate working code, as so many people marketing it have claimed it can. Try to use it just to help dig up facts for research, without having to double your research time to root out the complete fictions it produces.
Yes, I understand a computer capable of simulating both an understanding of natural language and the ability to either reply in it or generate very good-looking media in response to it is subjectively astounding. But that’s all it does right now: simulate the appearance of these things. That seems to get lost in all the hype.
but it keeps getting better. It used to be crap at chess, it now gets it. There are plugins for maths.
It can now do a good job of planning a trip (you give it a destination, some parameters, it’ll source planes tickets etc. better than google travel can).
It’s a lot of work processes that could be reorganised/upended even if the ‘hallucinations’ are a real problem for research focused stuff.