The International Criminal Court on Friday issued an arrest warrant for one “Mr. Vladimir Putin” in connection with the systematic abduction of Ukrainian children.
Also hypothetically under arrest: Maria Lvova-Belova, Putin’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights, who’s in charge of a sweeping effort to transfer the children and teenagers to Russia, where they’re adopted and assimilated. Russian state media portrays the chillingly nefarious program as a rescue mission, often using props (like teddy bars) to create favorable optics domestically.
The ICC isn’t enamored with it. “Incidents identified by my Office include the deportation of at least hundreds of children taken from orphanages and children’s care homes,” ICC prosecutor Karim Ahmad Khan said, calling a series of Kremlin decrees which expedite the conferral of Russian citizenship to the children “an intention to permanently remove [them] from their own country.”
He described visits to children’s homes in Ukraine, near the frontlines. First-hand accounts from caregivers “underlined the urgent need for action,” the ICC said.
Of course, Russia isn’t a party to the court, something Maria Zakharova, Putin’s de facto propaganda secretary, was keen to point out. “Russia is not cooperating with this body,” she said. Attempts to arrest Putin are “legally null and void for us.”
For all intents and purposes, they’re legally null and void for everyone, but the symbolism was meaningful. Putin is now a wanted man, and Lvova-Belova a wanted woman. There’s no diplomatic immunity at the ICC for heads of state when war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide are in question.
The timing was notable. Putin is set to receive Xi Jinping in Moscow next week. The news also came as Poland and Slovakia agreed to send Ukraine fighter jets, although the latter are mostly for spare parts, apparently.
America’s relationship with the ICC is notoriously fraught, and well beyond the scope of any single article. In a recent dust-up, Donald Trump sanctioned investigators looking into possible war crimes committed by the CIA and Americans in Afghanistan, and Mike Pompeo derided the court in harsh terms. The ICC called Pompeo’s remarks “an escalation and an unacceptable attempt to interfere with the rule of law and the court’s judicial proceedings.”
That dispute was resolved when the Biden administration annulled Trump’s sanctions, and Khan effectively dropped the investigation. Carve-outs in recent US legislation appeared to open the door for cooperation with the court, and perhaps even financial assistance, or at least as it relates to Ukraine.
Although Merrick Garland did visit Lviv this month, the US Justice Department isn’t currently investigating Putin for war crimes, but the White House has repeatedly suggested the US believes such crimes have in fact been committed.
Earlier this month, The New York Times reported that the Pentagon was preventing the Biden administration from sharing evidence of Russian atrocities with the court because “American military leaders… fear setting a precedent that might help pave the way for it to prosecute Americans.”
In Friday’s statement, the ICC suggested it might issue additional warrants tied to other war crimes, including those allegedly committed in Bucha. Whatever the case, the ICC said, “we cannot allow children to be treated as if they are the spoils of war.”
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Propaganda value limited here except for Dummies
Who’s the glass house? It’s not the US issuing the warrant.
Also, let me just remind readers before this gets going in the wrong direction: Kremlin-style “Whataboutism” isn’t permitted in our comments section, and neither is any sort of propaganda that could be construed as an apology for Russian aggression. This isn’t the place.
Would truly rejoice seeing Mr. Putin face an actual trial for his atrocities, sadly he has nuclear immunity, at least for now.
I wonder if this forces Putin to think twice about traveling abroad now or in the future, even to neutral countries
In 2022, these were the countries that Putin was reported to have visited: China, Belarus, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan (hard to spell), Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Iran, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan.
It would appear that Putin is staying relatively close to home and with relatives/friends.
LOL, only going where he can crash on the couch!
Not at all agreeing with George, but wondering whether this charge or a conviction is likely to affect the views of those capable of influencing Russia’s conduct of this war, namely the governments of China, India and Iran, and secondarily, Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis. Unfortunately I don’t think any of them will care.
You are probably right, the named countries/persons will probably not care.
A trial or conviction will be highly unlikely as well given that Russia does not recognizes the ICC. However, this charge does limit Putins movements, as he will be (at least theoretically) subject to extradiction should he visit any countries that do recognize the ICC. Not that he is showing any interest in doing so.
From that perspective he could at least still visit the US ?