You need a PLUS account to view this content. Try one month of PLUS for FREE.
Already have an account? log in
Beijing Cranks Up Rhetoric As US Turns Screws
Geopolitical rancor was on the menu Tuesday, familiar fare to be sure.
In his first news conference since becoming Chinese foreign minister, Qin Gang lashed out at Washington in a series of remarks that could've walked right out of a People's Daily "Op-Ed" -- or a Kim Yo-jong statement.
"If the United States continues to speed down the wrong path and doesn't hit the brakes, no amount of guardrails can prevent derailing," Qin said. The "guardrails" mention was a reference to a mutual understand
“Balderdash” …. really?
In the fuller texts I’ve read they point out that US sanctions on China are not solely due to national security concerns. Exhibit one is the TikTok kerfuffle.
It’s increasingly obvious that much of this is pure mercantilism and an escalating economic war.
What face-saving climb down have we left open for China? None whatsoever.
Yes, Derek, balderdash. It’s propaganda from a totalitarian regime run by a dictator who fashions himself a reincarnated Mao. You’ve been around long enough to remember Mao.
And yes, TikTok is dangerous. If you don’t see the opportunity for a Trojan Horse there, then go ahead and put TikTok on your phone and give it access to your other apps and location data.
If you’re not willing to do that then you’ve answered your own questions. If you are willing to do that, then I don’t think you know much about this.
Many apps on Google Play and the iStore have been found to be trojan laden. I give no apps access to other things on the phone, though they have become much more clever at evading scrutiny. Real examples, not hypotheticals.
But TikTok is not the biggest issue here. Pushing China into a corner with no exit ramp is.
Nobody is “pushing China into a corner.” The US isn’t obligated to sell the CCP advanced technology. If China wants a better widget, they can figure out how to build one themselves. The US also isn’t obligated to let a Chinese social media app collect data on 100 million Americans, many of whom are children. If China wants to run surveillance, let them do it at home. They just sailed a spy balloon across the entire country. Xi regularly references war with Taiwan, obliquely, sure, but you’d have to be a naive fool to not read between the lines. Xi’s China is a threat. It needs to be countered. There’s a reason why this is the only truly bipartisan issue on Capitol Hill. You keep pitching this in your comments as the sole purview of the CPAC crowd. Nothing could be further from the truth. Everybody on Capitol Hill with few exceptions (there are always a handful of exceptions) generally agrees about the need to counter this threat in all its various manifestations. And they’ve seen the intelligence. You haven’t.
So, what is the realistic end game to this?
Derek, with respect, you know there aren’t any answers to the question you’re asking. So why ask it? You’re just burning up my time, but more importantly, you’re burning up yours. What’s the solution to fraught bilateral relations between two superpowers at a critical inflection point for the world at the intersection of a new macro and geopolitical epoch? I have no idea. If you have the answer to that question, you could do your nation a service by traveling to Washington and telling everybody what that answer is. I do know what the answer isn’t, though. The answer isn’t: Trust Mao.
Yep, it’s tough.
But I do have one suggestion: don’t push China into a corner until we have adequate chip fab capacity away from Taiwan. Outside of the US election cycle, what was the rush?
Thanks to all for tolerating my rants.
I don’t mean to come across as abrasive, but I’ve given him (Xi) the benefit of the doubt in these pages over, and over, and over and over again, and it never works out. Infallibly, he disappoints. And the Xinjiang issue is very problematic when it comes to giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Thanks. Not taken that way at all.