Humanity just suffered two left-tail events in succession. Pestilence came calling in 2020 and then, in 2022, war came to NATO’s doorstep.
I’m always careful to show the proper respect for the plight of those for whom disease, famine and war are a fixture of daily life. We like to pretend we’ve come a long way as a species, and in many respects we have, but for far too many around the world, life is synonymous with perpetual tragedy and uninterrupted suffering.
With that important caveat, the last two years felt like a sadistic joke at humanity’s expense. Millions dead from a literal plague and the specter of a global conflict involving nuclear weapons shattered the relative calm and stability that characterized life in the Western world and developed economies for much of the last several decades.
The war is still raging, of course. Explosions rocked major Ukrainian cities this weekend. And we probably shouldn’t use the past tense when discussing the pandemic just yet. China on Saturday conceded that tens of thousands have died since COVID restrictions were eased last month (independent estimates put the number in the hundreds of thousands).
But purely from a macro perspective, the situation appears to be improving, at least at the margins. And that has implications for investors who, worn down by the Fed’s efforts to purge the QE-era mentality (i.e., leveraged-long risky assets and bonds), had little use for downside hedges by late 2022. Low exposure and large cash Overweights made hedging against additional downside somewhat superfluous. If there was anything that needed to be hedged, it was the “risk” of explosive rallies.
That helped explain a handful of purported “mysteries” pondered by the financial media last year, including a “too low” VIX and ostensible strangeness in a few options metrics. I repeatedly suggested there wasn’t anything mysterious about most of it. For reference, the most recent articles on that subject can be found here and here.
Below, find a few (very) short excerpts from Nomura’s Charlie McElligott, who tied all of the above together in a way I think is helpful when it comes to thinking about where we’ve been and where we might be going:
The potential set of ‘things that could go really wrong’ aren’t realizing at this moment, so demand for ‘wing-y / tail-y’ outcomes (especially downside) remains light and we see the probability distribution compress:
- ‘Immaculate Disinflation’ in the US, as Fed ‘over-tightening accident’ risk passes with terminal rate projections off the boil and a ‘pause’ well in sight
- US economic growth holding firm, led by still-strong labor and services
- China ‘zero COVID’ being lifted, with reopening providing a boost for the global economy and pushing back against global recession fears
- Deep European recession viewed as avoided thanks to the energy crisis cooling
- Ukraine / Russia relative stability maintaining
As I’ve stated repeatedly since spring of last year, it’s been a ‘short delta, short skew’ trade for much of the past year — because as global central banks were forced into an impulse tightening to crush demand-side inflation through tighter financial conditions, it has been a slow, grinding, ‘controlled demolition’ of legacy risk- / asset- exposures.
In turn, said ‘grinding’ de-grossing of exposures, in the case of equities, meant a ‘crashless’ selloff, very orderly in fact, which by 2H22 meant that skew and put skew were historically at all-time extreme lows, as there simply was not enough exposure on anymore to require ‘crashy’ downside hedges. Instead, all the ‘crash’ protection demand was for right-tail upside trades, because nobody had the underlying on.
Well, as people begin scrambling back into adding exposure, taking up nets and deploying cash into longs, we are finally beginning to see nascent signs of skew / put skew firming — because investors are finally going to have something that requires hedging again!


I think we’re at the dawn of a new right-tail event in tech. As recently as last week, I thought tech was going to have a rough year and we’d see a vicious cycle of layoffs and spending cuts causing earnings to drop and companies to go under. That may still happen in the short term, but I started playing around with generative AI this week and it appears to be the real deal. The level of sophistication was shocking and the use cases across industries and job functions was obvious immediately. I think this might be the modern tech version of the introduction of the assembly line.
It’s both awe-inspiring, but also terrifying as I’m afraid this will continue to drive inequality and job losses as one person will soon be able to do the work of multiple people. However, this will also unleash massive creativity and entrepreneurism. Want to start a company but not invest a ton of money into engineering, legal, or sales and marketing resources to launch? Want to write a book but need some help getting started? Generative AI will enable a lot more people to do those and many other things. The crazy thing is that this is still in its infancy and I’m already seeing people literally write code in minutes that would have taken them a week.
Regardless of what blockchain and crypto enthusiasts think, this will be the real web 3.0. I expect this to be the next big tech gold rush and I think it’ll happen faster than previous iterations. If you want to mine the miners, invest in companies that supply computing power. Maybe this new demand will get people to stop wasting actual valuable resources “mining” crypto 🙂
+1
Dayjob, Have you seen this AI K-pop band? Unbelievable! When I saw this, I immediately thought that the demand for human actors is going to go down dramatically.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=emTX1PEfMXU
For me the current economic and investing conditions seem quiet … too quiet…
I do agree 100% about the orderliness of said activity till this point, save for the housing, cryptos and bubble segments…
Just listened to the AI K-pop clip recommended by Emptynester. Found it boring. And somewhat nonsensical. Perhaps that is a reflection of K-pop rather than A-I? Bubblegum still likely tastes like bubblegum whether made by robots or humans…