“Symbolically, this is an important step,” SocGen’s Kit Juckes wrote Tuesday.
He was referring to the Bank of Japan’s surprise policy shift.
Yield-curve control tweaks aren’t the stuff general interest headlines are made of, but make no mistake: The bank’s decision to allow 10-year government bond yields to rise to 0.5%, double the previous ceiling, was one of Tuesday’s bigger stories for serious market participants. (Admittedly, the definition of “serious” in the context of traders, pundits and economists is malleable.)
Read more: Surprise! Bank Of Japan Stuns Markets With Policy Tweak
Maintenance of the 0.25% cap on benchmark yields required ongoing purchases by the BoJ as pressure on global bonds tested the ceiling. Those bond purchases were tantamount to easing, and preventing Japanese yields from rising meant that on any day when JGB yields were near the cap and US Treasurys were selling off, rate differentials moved against the yen.
That was part and parcel of the currency’s inexorable slide to a three-decade low (figure below).
Official intervention to arrest the yen’s slide meant the Japanese government and the BoJ were working at cross purposes, even as an obstinate Haruhiko Kuroda insisted he wasn’t trying to engineer a weaker yen.
On Tuesday, Kuroda was adamant that “this isn’t a rate hike.” That seemed incongruous with his previous remarks on the signaling effect from a wider yield-curve control band. “Although today’s measures will widen the yield band, we believe the effects of monetary easing, starting with yield-curve control, will spread more smoothly through corporate finance and other means as a result,” he added.
As you can imagine, the yen surged (figure below).
“Looked at through the lens of relative 10-year yields, the move is small, an 8bps narrowing in the spread to the US that leaves it 170bps wider than it was at the start of the year, but arguing that the USDJPY reaction, which is much more a function of the US side of the relationship, is excessive, would be to ignore the context,” SocGen’s Juckes said. “This is a change of direction for the BOJ [and] the yen remains undervalued on almost any measure.” In real effective terms, Juckes went on to note, the yen had fallen to its lowest level in nearly 50 years.
Plainly, this is bullish for Japanese banks and bearish for domestic equities in general. The Nikkei slid 2.5%, while bank shares rose more than 7% at one juncture, before trimming gains.
“From a risk perspective, it’s best not to underestimate the lingering impact this could have on broader sentiment because tighter BoJ policy would remove one of the last low-interest rate safe harbors that have helped to keep borrowing costs at low levels,” SPI Asset Management’s Stephen Innes remarked. “Investors are trying to find central banks’ endgame… and the BoJ raising the last low-rate anchor isn’t helping to calm year-end stormy seas.”
Ironically for a central bank synonymous with perpetual accommodation, the BoJ does revel in surprises which are “a monetary policy tool for them,” as one money manager who spoke to Bloomberg last week put it.
It’s easy to argue that the huge jump in 10-year yields (figure above) is a testament to the surprise element, but really it’s a testament to the notion that, as discussed in these pages on too many occasions to count this year, the market will be inclined to test the BoJ’s resolve by immediately driving yields up to the new ceiling. The new cap is 50bps, and at the highs Tuesday, yields were nearly there.
That, in turn, underscores the risk. Although unthinkable just nine months ago, it’s no longer far-fetched to suggest the market could force the BoJ out of yield-curve control, just as the RBA was compelled to abandon a short-lived experiment in YCC in November of 2021 after yields on the target note rose to eight times the ceiling.
“The forward policy ramifications from the move are aptly skewed as hawkish — greater flexibility on the 0.0% target is widely viewed as a precursor to either retiring the target or even outright rate hikes,” BMO’s Ian Lyngen and Ben Jeffery said. “Suffice it to say, the pace of future changes in BoJ policy will be topical as 2023 begins with April no longer viewed as an important inflection point in Tokyo.”
Kuroda said there were no plans to widen the band further, but conceded the market may push the envelope. Any relief for global bonds in 2023 (amid softer inflation, for example) could serve as a pressure release valve for JGBs, but with that caveat, I’d suggest Tuesday’s decision signals that YCC’s days are numbered. Even the BoJ has its limits, apparently.
Back in the early 1980s I was one of the two largest offshore traders of Japanese government bonds and interest rate swaps. (I recall trading the JGB numbers 59 and 61.)
One evening I called into our Tokyo branch to get an update on the markets. I asked Hida-san what was going on. His succinct reply was “Tempest in teapot.”
With all due respect to commentators smarter than me, I’m feeling the same about this = a tempest in a teapot.
But as our Dear Leader noted over the weekend, this was scheduled to be a slow news week so this tweak gives us something to get all excited about for a day or two.
But the timing by the BOJ was well chosen to get maximum impact, eh?
They are clever, though nothing will ever top the actions taken by SAMA when specs built up huge short positions in anticipation of a devaluation of the Saudi Rial. So SAMA announced first announced an upward revaluation of the peg. (I think it may have been on a weekend, just to maximize the impact.) Once the specs were chased out, they devalued the currency a few days later. Brilliant!
So many happy (?) memories of calling on SAMA back in those days – being shown into a conference room to a couple of guys in thobes who would not give you business cards and then proceeded to beat the daylights out of you about the interest rate on their call account. In a country where interest was not legal. Irony was dead even then.
You don’t have to like people to take their money
Way out of my depth, but . . .
Higher JGB yield and higher JPY should reduce the attractiveness of the carry trade and thus pressure US yields higher, right?
I’m not able to estimate the magnitude of any such effect, but my impression has always been that the JPY-USD carry trade is very, very large?
Still trying to figure out why the US yield curve steepened today. I would have expected this news to flatten the yield curve. What am I missing?
By the way, I get that worlwide yields should have risen. Just not sure why it would be on the long end? I would think the withdrawal of monetary stimulus, by Japan, even if marginal should not have caused long yields to rise more than the front end.
Interesting question. I wonder if it is as simple as that the BOJ raised the cap on JGB 10Y so the most affected UST maturity was the corresponding one?